Blake Bayldon and Max Purcell will play each other in the qualifications of the Wuning 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:30 am on Center Court. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Max Purcell who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Max Purcell is the pick to win this match.
Max Purcell -> 1.02
Blake Bayldon -> 9.3
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Blake Bayldon vs. Max Purcell
There is no head to head record between Blake Bayldon and Max Purcell since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Blake Bayldon
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-8 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-24 | 16-18 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-15 | 23-14 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked,he will start his run in the Wuning 3 Challenger after he played his last match in the Wuning 3 Challenger where he beat 7-6(4) 6-4 to Ichikawa in the qualifications on the 4th of October.
This will be the first match of the season on hard.
Talking about his overall career, Blake has an overall 53-51 record. He has a positive 44-39 record on hard.
Previously in the Wuning 3 Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Max Purcell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 17-6 | 14-6 | 0-0 | 3-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-24 | 10-16 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-28 | 45-17 | 2-3 | 5-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 21-15 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 680, the Australian reached the qualifications after defeating Julien De Cuyper 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against De Cuyper (6-4 6-4). During the match Purcell scored 80 points vs De Cuyper’s 62. Max was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Purcell fired 8 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Max Purcell was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (28/37) of his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Purcell broke De Cuyper 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
The Australian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Wuning.
The Australian has a compiled 17-5 win-loss record in 2026, 14-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bayldon | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 |
| Pts | 85-78 | 80-62 |
| Total Points | 163 | 142 |
| Winners | 41 | 28 |
| %Winners | 48% | 35% |
Both Bayldon and Purcell played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Bayldon and Purcell have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Bayldon played 3 games more than Purcell. The Australian scored 41 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Max blasted 28 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bayldon | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 8 |
| 1st in | 52/83 | 37/58 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 41/52 | 28/37 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 14/21 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 67% |
Bayldon managed to score 13 aces . Purcell struck 8 aces . Bayldon won 79% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Purcell won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bayldon | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 3 |
| Converted | 1/10 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 10% | 43% |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 |
| Saved | 7 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Bayldon broke his opponent once with a 10% conversion rate. Blake extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 7 break points. Max broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Max conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bayldon | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | 0% | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | % | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Purcell | |||
| Q1 De |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 80-62 | 80-62 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 37/58 | 37/58 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 28/37 | 28/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
W
WWWWWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Max PurcellPurcell – Blake BayldonBayldon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca CastelnuovoCastelnuovo – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – Aoran WangWang (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristjan TammTamm – Martin BorisioukBorisiouk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Sergey FominFomin – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Semen PankinPankin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda – Yuta KikuchiKikuchi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
