Luka Mikrut and Kimmer Coppejans will square off in the 2nd round of the Genoa 2 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on Grandstand. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Luka Mikrut who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Luka Mikrut is the pick to win this match.
Luka Mikrut -> 1.71
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.99
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Luka Mikrut vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 2nd time that Luka Mikrut and Kimmer Coppejans fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Mikrut (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Mikrut won 6-4 6-4 in the 1st round in the Milan Challenger back in 2025.
Luka Mikrut
13 - 10win/loss
167
159
WWWWWLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 17-10 | 3-5 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 57-20 | 4-3 | 52-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-26 | 5-4 | 31-19 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-18 | 5-3 | 28-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-14 | 9-2 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 214, Luka reached the 2nd round after beating Federico Iannaccone 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Croatian had a good straight sets win against Iannaccone (6-1 6-2). During the match, Mikrut scored 51 points vs Iannaccone’s 23. Mikrut was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mikrut scored 4 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Luka Mikrut was pretty effective on serve to win 85% (23/27) of his 1st serve and 82% (9/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Croatian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Iannaccone 4 times.
Mikrut has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 62% of his matches (156-95). 10-4 on clay in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mikrut has a composed128-71 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
Luka’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Bad Rappenau Challenger.
The Croatian has an overall 13-10 win-loss record in 2026, 10-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Genoa 2 Challenger
Luka has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimmer Coppejans
37 - 26win/loss
232
97
WWLWLLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 39-27 | 7-6 | 29-18 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 46-29 | 20-10 | 24-16 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-8 | 22-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 227, Kimmer reached the 2nd round after beating Sean Cuenin 7-6(6) ret..
In the 1st round against Cuenin, Coppejans had a free pass after Cuenin retired on a 7-66 . scoreline.
The Belgian has an aggregate 37-26 win-loss record in 2026, 29-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mikrut | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 13 |
| Pts | 51-23 | 49-47 |
| Total Points | 74 | 96 |
| Winners | 23 | 15 |
| %Winners | 45% | 31% |
Both Mikrut and Coppejans played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mikrut and Coppejans have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mikrut played 2 games more than Coppejans. Mikrut scored 23 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Belgian recorded 15 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mikrut | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2 |
| 1st in | 27/38 | 26/44 |
| %1st in | 71% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 15/26 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 58% |
| 2nd pts | 9/11 | 11/18 |
| %2nd pts | 82% | 61% |
Mikrut fired 4 aces . Coppejans scored 2 aces . Mikrut won 85% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 82% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 58% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mikrut | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 2/6 |
| % Converted | 100% | 33% |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Croatian broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Croatian quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Kimmer broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. The Belgian conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mikrut | |||
| R1 Iannaccone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 51-23 | 51-23 | |
| Total points | 74 | 74 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/38 | 27/38 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 23/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/11 | 9/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 82% | 82% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Coppejans | |||
| R1 Cuenin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 1 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 49-47 | 49-47 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/44 | 26/44 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Genoa 2 Challenger
- Francesco FortiForti – Ryan NijboerNijboer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – John SperleSperle (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Sean CueninCuenin (7-66 ret.) – See score progression
- Tom GentzschGentzsch – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Federico IannacconeIannaccone (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Stefano D’AgostinoD’Agostino (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Carlo Alberto CaniatoAlberto Caniato – Lorenzo BertoBerto (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Filippo RomanoRomano (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Florian BroskaBroska (6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Juan Cruz Martin ManzanoCruz Martin Manzano – Samuele PieriPieri (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Dali BlanchBlanch – Sandro KoppKopp (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas NeumayerNeumayer – Stefano D’AgostinoD’Agostino (6-3 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Federico IannacconeIannaccone (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Sean CueninCuenin (7-6(6) ret.) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – John SperleSperle (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Carlo Alberto CaniatoAlberto Caniato – Lorenzo BertoBerto (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Tom GentzschGentzsch – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Francesco FortiForti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
