Michael Mmoh and Darwin Blanch will play each other in the final of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 5:30 pm on Court 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Mmoh is the pick to win this match.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.66
Darwin Blanch -> 2.06
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Darwin Blanch
There is no head to head record between Michael Mmoh and Darwin Blanch since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Michael Mmoh
30 - 19win/loss
148
81
LWWWWLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 30-19 | 26-12 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 17-16 | 7-7 | 3-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 178, Michael reached the final after defeating Karue Sell 6-3 6-2, Patrick Maloney 7-5 6-3, Abedallah Shelbayh 6-4 6-4 and Jeff Wolf 6-2 6-2.
In the semifinal, The American had a good straight sets win against Wolf (6-2 6-2). During the match, Mmoh scored 56 points vs Wolf’s 37. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mmoh fired 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Michael Mmoh lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Mmoh put 66% of his first serves in, winning 76% (25/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. Michael broke Wolf 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Michael hasn’t dropped yet a set in this tournament to conquer 58% of the points he played.
ATP Tiburon Challenger - Michael Mmoh's projected path
Mmoh has good record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (261-197). 26-11 on hard in 2026. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mmoh has a compiled 161-112 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Morelos Challenger where he defeated Taro Daniel in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Mmoh has an overall 30-18 win-loss record in 2026, 26-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2018. See his history.
Darwin Blanch
27 - 25win/loss
166
166
WWWWWWLLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 28-25 | 13-14 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 40-22 | 31-14 | 2-3 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-19 | 16-10 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-7 | 0-2 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 7-4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 245, the American reached the final after defeating Stefan Kozlov 6-3 2-6 7-6(10), Federico Agustin Gomez 6-3 6-0, Bryce Nakashima 6-3 6-3 and Michael Zheng 7-6(5) 7-6(9).
In the semifinal, Blanch had a good straight sets win against Zheng (7-65 7-69). During the match Blanch scored 102 points vs Zheng’s 100. Darwin was pretty aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about serving, Blanch made 11 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Darwin Blanch lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Blanch put 61% of his first serves in, winning 74% (50/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (22/44) on the 2nd serve. Darwin broke Zheng once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Darwin has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
ATP Tiburon Challenger - Darwin Blanch's projected path
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Tiburon Challenger.
Darwin has a compiled 26-25 win-loss record in 2026, 11-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mmoh | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 74 | 89 |
| Pts | 263-194 | 331-283 |
| Total Points | 457 | 614 |
| Winners | 106 | 136 |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% |
Both Mmoh and Blanch played 4 matches. At the moment, Darwin Blanch surrendered 1 set while Michael Mmoh hasn’t conceded a set so far. Mmoh has played 1 set(s) less than Blanch (8 vs 9). Therefore, Mmoh played 15 games less than Blanch. The American scored 106 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Darwin scored 136 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mmoh | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5.3 |
| 1st in | 150/221 | 180/315 |
| %1st in | 68% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 106/150 | 136/180 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 33/71 | 74/135 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 55% |
Mmoh blasted 20 aces (5 per match). Blanch struck 21 aces (5.3 per match). Mmoh won 71% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Blanch won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mmoh | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 21 | 11 |
| Converted | 21/33 | 11/28 |
| % Converted | 64% | 39% |
| Conceded | 21 | 18 |
| Saved | 13 | 13 |
| % Saved | 62% | 72% |
| Times Broken | 8 | 5 |
The American broke his opponents 21 times with a 64% conversion rate. Mmoh surrendered his serve 8 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Darwin broke his opponents 11 times with a 39% conversion rate. Blanch conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 72% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mmoh | ||||||
| R1 Sell |
R2 Maloney |
1/4 Shelbayh |
1/2 Wolf |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 21 | 20 | 16 | 74 | |
| pts | 70-50 | 74-55 | 63-52 | 56-37 | 263-194 | |
| Total points | 120 | 129 | 115 | 93 | 457 | |
| Winners | 29 | 26 | 26 | 25 | 106 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 35% | 41% | 45% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 44/56 | 36/59 | 37/56 | 33/50 | 150/221 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 61% | 66% | 66% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 29/44 | 26/36 | 26/37 | 25/33 | 106/150 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 72% | 70% | 76% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/12 | 14/23 | 8/19 | 7/17 | 33/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 61% | 42% | 41% | 46% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 21 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 5/7 | 5/8 | 5/6 | 21/33 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 71% | 63% | 83% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 21 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 3/5 | 4/7 | 2/3 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 60% | 57% | 67% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |
| Blanch | ||||||
| R1 Kozlov |
R2 Agustin |
1/4 Nakashima |
1/2 Zheng |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 7-610 | 6-3 6-0 | 6-3 6-3 | 7-65 7-69 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 15 | 18 | 26 | 89 | |
| pts | 108-99 | 59-31 | 62-53 | 102-100 | 331-283 | |
| Total points | 207 | 90 | 115 | 202 | 614 | |
| Winners | 42 | 22 | 22 | 50 | 136 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 37% | 35% | 49% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 57/103 | 25/43 | 30/57 | 68/112 | 180/315 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 58% | 53% | 61% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 42/57 | 22/25 | 22/30 | 50/68 | 136/180 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 88% | 73% | 74% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/46 | 11/18 | 17/27 | 22/44 | 74/135 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 61% | 63% | 50% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/9 | 3/8 | 1/3 | 11/28 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 44% | 38% | 33% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 18 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 7/8 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 60% | – | – | 88% | 37% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW 
