Timo Legout and Daniil Ostapenkov will square off in the qualifications of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on Court 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Timo Legout who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Timo Legout is the pick to win this match.
Timo Legout -> 1.43
Daniil Ostapenkov -> 2.58
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Timo Legout vs. Daniil Ostapenkov
There is no head to head record between Timo Legout and Daniil Ostapenkov since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Timo Legout
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 31-10 | 29-9 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-7 | 11-3 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-16 | 4-2 | 15-11 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 32-20 | 12-8 | 19-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 444, Timo got to the qualifications after defeating Evan Bynoe 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Bynoe (6-1 6-4). During the match, Legout scored 58 points vs Bynoe’s 38. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Legout wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Timo Legout lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Legout put 76% of his first serves in, winning 70% (26/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the 2nd serve. Legout broke Bynoe 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Legout has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 62% of his matches (132-80). 24-8 on hard in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Legout has an aggregate56-26 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Legout’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Southaven.
Legout has a compiled 26-9 win-loss record in 2026, 24-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniil Ostapenkov
32 - 18win/loss
555
525
LWLWLLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 33-19 | 26-16 | 4-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 46-19 | 46-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 18-10 | 11-3 | 4-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-15 | 31-13 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-20 | 23-14 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 554, Ostapenkov got to the qualifications after defeating Gus Grumet 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Belarussian had a good straight sets win against Grumet (6-2 6-2). During the match Ostapenkov scored 54 points vs Grumet’s 32. Ostapenkov was quite aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Ostapenkov scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniil Ostapenkov was exceptionally effective on serve to win 86% (18/21) of his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ostapenkov broke Grumet 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Daniil’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Kutaisi.
Ostapenkov has a composed 32-17 win-loss record in 2026, 25-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Legout | Ostapenkov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 16 |
| Pts | 58-38 | 54-32 |
| Total Points | 96 | 86 |
| Winners | 26 | 18 |
| %Winners | 45% | 33% |
Both Legout and Ostapenkov played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Legout and Ostapenkov have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Legout played 1 game more than Ostapenkov. Legout scored 26 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Ostapenkov recorded 18 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Legout | Ostapenkov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 37/49 | 21/41 |
| %1st in | 76% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 26/37 | 18/21 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 14/20 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 70% |
Legout didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Ostapenkov scored 1 ace . Legout won 70% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Ostapenkov won 86% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Legout | Ostapenkov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 83% | 57% |
| Conceded | 8 | 0 |
| Saved | 7 | 0 |
| % Saved | 88% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The French player broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. The French player lost his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Daniil broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Belarussian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Legout | |||
| Q1 Bynoe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-38 | 58-38 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 37/49 | 37/49 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 26/37 | 26/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Ostapenkov | |||
| Q1 Grumet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 54-32 | 54-32 | |
| Total points | 86 | 86 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 21/41 | 21/41 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 18/21 | 18/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/20 | 14/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Keegan SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karue SellSell – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Igor Ribeiro MarcondesRibeiro Marcondes – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca StaeheliStaeheli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
