
Lucie Havlickova and Nao Hibino will play each other in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 PM on Court 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lucie Havlickova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lucie Havlickova is the pick to win this match.
Lucie Havlickova -> 1.8
Nao Hibino -> 1.95
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Lucie Havlickova vs. Nao Hibino
This will be the 2nd time that Lucie Havlickova and Nao Hibino clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Hibino (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Hibino won 6-0 6-4 in the 1st round in the Seixal back in July 2026.
Lucie Havlickova

19 - 18win/loss
185
182
LWLWLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 22-21 | 5-5 | 9-8 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 37-8 | 1-1 | 15-2 | 21-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-20 | 0-4 | 15-10 | 17-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-13 | 7-4 | 8-6 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 225, Lucie got to the qualifications after defeating Elizara Yaneva 6-2 7-5 and Moyuka Uchijima 6-2 2-6 7-6(6).
In the qualifications, The Czech defeated Uchijima (6-2 2-6 7-66). During the match, Havlickova scored 100 points vs Uchijima’s 98. The Czech was exceptionally aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Havlickova struck 4 aces and she committed only 9 double faults. Lucie Havlickova lost the serve 4 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Havlickova put 59% of her first serves in, winning 70% (42/60) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (15/41) on the 2nd serve. Havlickova broke Uchijima 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Havlickova started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has dropped 1 set in this competition to win 53% of the points she played.
Havlickova has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 62% of her matches (137-84). 4-4 on hard in 2026. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Havlickova has an aggregate14-18 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Czech’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the W75 Trnava.
The Czech has an aggregate 19-18 win-loss record in 2026, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See her history.
Nao Hibino

23 - 19win/loss
157
56
LWWWLWWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 29-23 | 20-16 | 1-2 | 5-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 26-26 | 15-13 | 10-11 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-32 | 21-21 | 2-7 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-30 | 26-19 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 26-19 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 227, Hibino reached the qualifications after beating Janae Preston 7-6(4) 6-1 and Anna Siskova 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Nao had a good straight sets win against Siskova (6-4 6-2). During the match Hibino scored 64 points vs Siskova’s 44. The Japanese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Hibino bagged 3 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Nao Hibino lost the serve once. Furthermore, Hibino put 76% of her first serves in, winning 70% (26/37) of the points behind her 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the 2nd serve. Hibino broke Siskova 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Japanese started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 57% of the points she played.
Hibino’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the W75 Brisbane.
Hibino has a compiled 23-19 win-loss record in 2026, 17-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2017. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Havlickova | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 49 | 38 |
| Pts | 180-161 | 154-118 |
| Total Points | 341 | 272 |
| Winners | 71 | 68 |
| %Winners | 39% | 44% |
Both Havlickova and Hibino played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Lucie Havlickova conceded 1 set while Nao Hibino hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Havlickova has played 1 set more than Hibino (5 vs 4). Therefore, Havlickova played 11 games more than Hibino. Havlickova scored 71 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Nao bagged 68 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Havlickova | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| 1st in | 102/173 | 101/141 |
| %1st in | 59% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 71/102 | 68/101 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 30/71 | 18/40 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 45% |
Havlickova blasted 7 aces (3.5 per match). Hibino recorded 7 aces (3.5 per match). Havlickova won 70% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Hibino won 67% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Havlickova | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 9 |
| Converted | 9/20 | 9/17 |
| % Converted | 45% | 53% |
| Conceded | 17 | 9 |
| Saved | 11 | 5 |
| % Saved | 65% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 4 |
Lucie broke her opponents 9 times with a 45% conversion rate. Havlickova lost her serve 6 times and she saved 65% of the break points that she conceded. Nao broke her opponents 9 times with a 53% conversion rate. Nao conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 56% of the break points that she conceded.
| Havlickova | ||||
| Q1 Yaneva |
Q2 Uchijima |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | 6-2 2-6 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 29 | 49 | |
| pts | 80-63 | 100-98 | 180-161 | |
| Total points | 143 | 198 | 341 | |
| Winners | 29 | 42 | 71 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 42% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 9 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 42/72 | 60/101 | 102/173 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 29/42 | 42/60 | 71/102 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 15/41 | 30/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 37% | 42% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 4/10 | 9/20 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 9 | 17 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 5/9 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 56% | 66% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Hibino | ||||
| Q1 Preston |
Q2 Siskova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 18 | 38 | |
| pts | 90-74 | 64-44 | 154-118 | |
| Total points | 164 | 108 | 272 | |
| Winners | 42 | 26 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 41% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 64/92 | 37/49 | 101/141 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 76% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 42/64 | 26/37 | 68/101 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 70% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 8/12 | 18/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 67% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 4/7 | 9/17 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 57% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 1 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 0/1 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 0% | 32% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Vendula ValdmannovaValdmannova – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (5-7 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia – Mai HontamaHontama (5-7 7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Julieta ParejaPareja – Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Heather WatsonWatson – Angela Fita BoludaFita Boluda (6-4 5-7 7-65) – See score progression
- Darja SemenistajaSemenistaja – Alexandra ShubladzeShubladze (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – Sofia CostoulasCostoulas (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Carson BranstineBranstine – Linda FruhvirtovaFruhvirtova (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Veronika PodrezPodrez (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Clara BurelBurel (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Arantxa RusRus – Suzan LamensLamens (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mia RisticRistic – Francisca JorgeJorge (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (7-63 7-6) – See score progression
- Elena PridankinaPridankina – Rebecca MarinoMarino (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Madison BrengleBrengle (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Harriet DartDart – Kristina PenickovaPenickova (5-7 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Lucie HavlickovaHavlickova – Moyuka UchijimaUchijima (6-2 2-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Mary StoianaStoiana – Katie SwanSwan (6-75 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson – Dominika SalkovaSalkova (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Robin MontgomeryMontgomery – Jeline VandrommeVandromme (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Joanna GarlandGarland – Priscilla HonHon (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze – Alevtina IbragimovaIbragimova (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Martyna KubkaKubka – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Anouk KoevermansKoevermans – Linda KlimovicovaKlimovicova (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Himeno SakatsumeSakatsume – Tyra Caterina GrantCaterina Grant (5-7 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Viktoria HruncakovaHruncakova (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Nao HibinoHibino – Anna SiskovaSiskova (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Yue YuanYuan – Julia AvdeevaAvdeeva (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Storm HunterHunter – Yeon Woo KuWoo Ku (4-6 7-66 6-0) – See score progression
- Francesca JonesJones – Mona BarthelBarthel (7-63 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Polina IatcenkoIatcenko – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (6-2 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Kristina LiutovaLiutova – Lola RadivojevicRadivojevic (6-2 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Sem VerbeekVerbeek – Lodewijk WeststrateWeststrate (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Stijn PelPel – Vladimir IvanovIvanov (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Lucie HavlickovaHavlickova – Moyuka UchijimaUchijima (6-2 2-6 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Nao HibinoHibino – Anna SiskovaSiskova (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesca JonesJones – Mona BarthelBarthel (7-6(3) 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Joanna GarlandGarland – Priscilla HonHon (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Darja SemenistajaSemenistaja – Alexandra ShubladzeShubladze (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Storm HunterHunter – Yeon Woo KuWoo Ku (4-6 7-6(6) 6-0) – See score progression
- Arantxa RusRus – Suzan LamensLamens (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Heather WatsonWatson – Angela Fita BoludaFita Boluda (6-4 5-7 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – Sofia CostoulasCostoulas (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Vendula ValdmannovaValdmannova – Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich (5-7 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Veronika PodrezPodrez (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Yue YuanYuan – Julia AvdeevaAvdeeva (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mary StoianaStoiana – Katie SwanSwan (6-7(5) 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Kristina LiutovaLiutova – Lola RadivojevicRadivojevic (6-2 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Martyna KubkaKubka – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Carson BranstineBranstine – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Joanna GarlandGarland (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Arantxa RusRus (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Harriet DartDart (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariam BolkvadzeBolkvadze – (0-0) – H2H and prediction



