Anna Siskova and Nao Hibino will play each other in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 PM on Court 8. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Anna Siskova who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Anna Siskova is the pick to win this match.
Anna Siskova -> 1.87
Nao Hibino -> 1.87
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Anna Siskova vs. Nao Hibino
There is no head to head record between Anna Siskova and Nao Hibino since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Anna Siskova
33 - 16win/loss
170
161
LWWWWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 38-17 | 11-2 | 16-8 | 11-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 46-19 | 20-3 | 21-12 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 16-16 | 7-3 | 9-9 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-29 | 3-3 | 13-14 | 10-12 | 0-0 | 1-0 |
| 2022 | 29-35 | 1-3 | 23-23 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 207 (career-high), the Czech got to the qualifications after beating Noma Akugue Noha 1-6 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications against Akugue Noha, The Czech recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-4 7-5). During the match, Siskova and Akugue Noha scored the same amount of points (89). However, the world no. 207 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Anna was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Siskova wasn’t able to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and she committed only 1 double fault. Anna Siskova lost the serve 4 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Siskova put 81% of her first serves in, winning 65% (46/71) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Akugue Noha 4 times after converting 67% of her break points (4/6).
Siskova has good record in the last 10 years having won 58% of her matches (290-206). 6-0 on hard in 2026. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Siskova has an aggregate 79-36 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Her best result of the current year was conquering the title the W50 Hamburg where she beat Rasheeda Mcadoo in the final 7-6(6) 1-6 6-3.
The Czech has a composed 33-15 win-loss record in 2026, 6-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Siskova has never competed in this tournament before.
Nao Hibino
23 - 19win/loss
157
56
LWWWLWWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 29-23 | 20-16 | 1-2 | 5-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 26-26 | 15-13 | 10-11 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-32 | 21-21 | 2-7 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-30 | 26-19 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 26-19 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 227, the Japanese got to the qualifications after beating Janae Preston 7-6(4) 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Preston (7-64 6-1). During the match Hibino scored 90 points vs Preston’s 74. Nao was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Hibino scored 4 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Nao Hibino lost the serve 3 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Hibino put 70% of her first serves in, winning 66% (42/64) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (10/28) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Preston 5 times after converting 50% of her break points (5/10).
Hibino’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the W75 Brisbane.
The Japanese has an aggregate 22-19 win-loss record in 2026, 16-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2017. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Siskova | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 20 |
| Pts | 89-89 | 90-74 |
| Total Points | 178 | 164 |
| Winners | 46 | 42 |
| %Winners | 52% | 47% |
Both Siskova and Hibino played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Anna Siskova conceded 1 set while Nao Hibino hasn’t conceded a set so far. Siskova has played 1 set more than Hibino (3 vs 2). Therefore, Siskova played 9 games more than Hibino. The Czech scored 46 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Nao blasted 42 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Siskova | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 71/88 | 64/92 |
| %1st in | 81% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 46/71 | 42/64 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 10/28 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 36% |
Siskova didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Hibino managed to score 4 aces . Siskova won 65% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Hibino won 66% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Siskova | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 10 | 8 |
| Saved | 6 | 5 |
| % Saved | 60% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Siskova broke her opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Anna conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. The Japanese broke her opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Hibino conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded.
| Siskova | |||
| Q1 Akugue |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 89-89 | 89-89 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 71/88 | 71/88 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 81% | |
| 1st pts | 46/71 | 46/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Hibino | |||
| Q1 Preston |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 90-74 | 90-74 | |
| Total points | 164 | 164 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 64/92 | 64/92 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 42/64 | 42/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 10/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Stijn PelPel – Vladimir IvanovIvanov (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sem VerbeekVerbeek – Lodewijk WeststrateWeststrate (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Anna SiskovaSiskova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Mona BarthelBarthel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Joanna GarlandGarland (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yeon Woo KuWoo Ku – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Suzan LamensLamens (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Angela Fita BoludaFita Boluda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Francisca JorgeJorge – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie SwanSwan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
