
Suzan Lamens and Arantxa Rus will face off in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 PM on Court 15. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Suzan Lamens who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Suzan Lamens is the pick to win this match.
Suzan Lamens -> 1.48
Arantxa Rus -> 2.54
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Suzan Lamens vs. Arantxa Rus
This will be the 3rd time that Suzan Lamens and Arantxa Rus play each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Rus (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they played, Rus won 6-1 6-4 in the 1st round in the Hamburg back in 2024.
Suzan Lamens

17 - 22win/loss
215
57
LLLWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 19-26 | 3-12 | 8-8 | 5-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 29-31 | 16-19 | 6-5 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-27 | 15-11 | 19-10 | 11-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-31 | 7-7 | 33-19 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-27 | 13-9 | 24-11 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 164, Lamens reached the qualifications after beating Emerson Jones 7-5 6-7(7) 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Dutch defeated Jones (7-5 6-77 6-2). During the match, Lamens scored 114 points vs Jones’s 102. Lamens was very aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lamens struck 7 aces and she committed only 8 double faults. Suzan Lamens lost the serve 3 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Lamens put 57% of her first serves in, winning 70% (45/64) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (24/48) on the 2nd serve. Suzan broke Jones 6 times after converting 60% of her break points (6/10).
Lamens has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of her matches (319-245). 1-7 on hard in 2026. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Lamens has an overall 89-83 record in the last years on hard.
Suzan has an overall 17-21 win-loss record in 2026, 1-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2025. See her history.
Arantxa Rus

17 - 21win/loss
258
41
LWWWLLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 21-25 | 10-7 | 10-15 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 39-37 | 11-12 | 28-20 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-33 | 14-14 | 19-13 | 2-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-22 | 10-10 | 43-8 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-33 | 9-10 | 29-17 | 7-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 203, Arantxa reached the qualifications after defeating Teodora Kostovic 4-6 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Kostovic, Arantxa recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match Rus scored 97 points vs Kostovic’s 92. Arantxa was pretty aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Rus struck 2 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Arantxa Rus was pretty effective on serve to win 72% (41/57) of her 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. The Dutch broke Kostovic 3 times after converting 33% of her break points (3/9).
Arantxa has an overall 16-21 win-loss record in 2026, 5-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2011 and 2024. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lamens | Rus |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 30 |
| Pts | 114-102 | 97-92 |
| Total Points | 216 | 189 |
| Winners | 45 | 41 |
| %Winners | 39% | 42% |
Both Lamens and Rus played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Suzan Lamens conceded 1 set, while Arantxa Rus dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lamens and Rus have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Lamens played 3 games more than Rus. Lamens scored 45 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch made 41 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lamens | Rus |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 64/112 | 57/88 |
| %1st in | 57% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 45/64 | 41/57 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 18/31 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 58% |
Lamens struck 7 aces . Rus scored 2 aces . Lamens won 70% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Rus won 72% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lamens | Rus |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 60% | 33% |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 40% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Suzan broke her opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Suzan dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded. Rus broke her opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Arantxa conceded her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Lamens | |||
| Q1 Jones |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-77 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 114-102 | 114-102 | |
| Total points | 216 | 216 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 64/112 | 64/112 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 45/64 | 45/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 24/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Rus | |||
| Q1 Kostovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 97-92 | 97-92 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 57/88 | 57/88 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 41/57 | 41/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 18/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Stijn PelPel – Vladimir IvanovIvanov (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sem VerbeekVerbeek – Lodewijk WeststrateWeststrate (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Anna SiskovaSiskova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca JonesJones – Mona BarthelBarthel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Joanna GarlandGarland (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yeon Woo KuWoo Ku – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Susan BandecchiBandecchi – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Suzan LamensLamens (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Angela Fita BoludaFita Boluda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Francisca JorgeJorge – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie SwanSwan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction







