Daniil Medvedev and Marin Cilic will face off in the quarter of the Libema Open for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Medvedev who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniil Medvedev is the pick to win this match.
Daniil Medvedev -> 1.4
Marin Cilic -> 2.94
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniil Medvedev vs. Marin Cilic
This will be the 5th time that Daniil Medvedev and Marin Cilic fight against each other. The head to head is 3-1 for Medvedev (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on grass.
The last time that they played each other, Cilic won 6-2 6-3 6-2 in the 4th round in at the French Open back in 2022.
Highlights Marin Cilic vs Daniil Medvedev – French Open 30-May-2022
Daniil Medvedev
25 - 9win/loss
5
1
WLWWWWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 42-17 | 31-9 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 41-23 | 20-12 | 6-4 | 10-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-21 | 28-9 | 11-5 | 1-5 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 66-18 | 38-8 | 10-3 | 11-4 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-19 | 26-8 | 3-2 | 8-6 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 8, Daniil got to the quarter after defeating Thijs Boogaard 6-3 4-6 7-6(6).
In the 2nd round, Medvedev defeated Boogaard (6-3 4-6 7-6(6)). During the match, Medvedev scored 114 points vs Boogaard’s 104. Daniil was very aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Talking about the service games, Medvedev made 15 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Daniil Medvedev lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Medvedev put 63% of his first serves in, winning 81% (47/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. The Russian broke Boogaard 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
ATP 'S Hertogenbosch - Daniil Medvedev's projected path
Medvedev has a remarkable match record in the last 10 years having won 71% of his matches (454-187). 1-0 on grass in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Medvedev has a composed 53-24 match record in the last years on grass.
His best result of the year was conquering the title in Brisbane where he overcame Brandon Nakashima in the final 6-2 7-6(1) and in Dubai where he overcame Tallon Griekspoor in the final w/o.
Daniil has an overall 25-9 win-loss record in 2026, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2022. See his history.
Marin Cilic
13 - 10win/loss
80
3
LLLWLLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 14-16 | 6-8 | 3-4 | 3-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 29-20 | 3-6 | 11-9 | 6-3 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 9-11 | 8-6 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-21 | 16-10 | 9-5 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 47, Marin reached the quarter after beating Denis Shapovalov 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 and Nuno Borges 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
In the 2nd round against Borges, The Croatian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-6(5) 6-3). During the match Cilic scored 98 points vs Borges’s 93. The Croatian was very aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about serving, Cilic blasted 17 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Marin Cilic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Cilic put 60% of his first serves in, winning 77% (50/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (20/43) on the 2nd serve. Cilic was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Borges twice.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Croatian has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
ATP 'S Hertogenbosch - Marin Cilic's projected path
Marin’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Dallas.
Marin has an aggregate 13-10 win-loss record in 2026, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2017. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Medvedev | Cilic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 66 |
| Pts | 114-104 | 208-190 |
| Total Points | 218 | 398 |
| Winners | 47 | 97 |
| %Winners | 41% | 47% |
Medvedev played 1 match while Cilic competed in 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Daniil Medvedev lost 1 set, while Marin Cilic dropped 2 sets. Medvedev has played 3 set(s) less than Cilic (3 vs 6). Therefore, Medvedev played 34 games less than Cilic. The Russian scored 47 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Marin struck 97 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Medvedev | Cilic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 11 |
| 1st in | 58/92 | 127/210 |
| %1st in | 63% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 47/58 | 97/127 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 17/34 | 38/83 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 46% |
Medvedev struck 15 aces . Cilic blasted 22 aces (11 per match). Medvedev won 81% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Cilic won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Medvedev | Cilic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 9 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 9/12 |
| % Converted | 25% | 75% |
| Conceded | 5 | 15 |
| Saved | 3 | 7 |
| % Saved | 60% | 47% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 8 |
The Russian broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Russian lost his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Marin broke his opponents 9 times with a 75% conversion rate. Cilic conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 47% of the break points that he conceded.
| Medvedev | |||
| R2 Boogaard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 114-104 | 114-104 | |
| Total points | 218 | 218 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 58/92 | 58/92 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 47/58 | 47/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/34 | 17/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Cilic | ||||
| R1 Shapovalov |
R2 Borges |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 7-5 | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 31 | 66 | |
| pts | 110-97 | 98-93 | 208-190 | |
| Total points | 207 | 191 | 398 | |
| Winners | 47 | 50 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 51% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 17 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 62/102 | 65/108 | 127/210 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 47/62 | 50/65 | 97/127 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 77% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/40 | 20/43 | 38/83 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 47% | 46% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 7/10 | 2/2 | 9/12 | |
| Converted % | 70% | 100% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 8 | 15 | |
| Saved | 2/7 | 5/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 29% | 63% | 92% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Felix Auger-AliassimeAuger-Aliassime (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Felix Auger-AliassimeAuger-Aliassime (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zizou Bergs/Arthur RinderknechBergs/Arthur Rinderknech – N.Sriram Balaji/Rajeev RamBalaji/Rajeev Ram (7-5 7-68) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tallon Griekspoor/Botic Van de ZandschulpGriekspoor/Botic Van de Zandschulp – Felix Auger Aliassime/Denis ShapovalovAuger Aliassime/Denis Shapovalov (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Marin CilicCilic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
