Vladyslav Orlov and Tommaso Compagnucci will play each other in the qualifications of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 7. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tommaso Compagnucci who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tommaso Compagnucci is the pick to win this match.
Tommaso Compagnucci -> 1.72
Vladyslav Orlov -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vladyslav Orlov vs. Tommaso Compagnucci
There is no head to head record between Vladyslav Orlov and Tommaso Compagnucci since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Vladyslav Orlov
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 30-26 | 8-8 | 22-17 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-39 | 23-21 | 14-17 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 16-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 30-33 | 6-7 | 21-21 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 33-14 | 23-8 | 10-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 397, the Ukrainian got to the qualifications after beating Moritz Pieper 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Orlov had a good straight sets win against Pieper (6-4 6-2). During the match, Orlov scored 67 points vs Pieper’s 51. The Ukrainian was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Orlov scored just 1 ace in the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Vladyslav Orlov lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Orlov put 63% of his first serves in, winning 64% (23/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Vladyslav broke Pieper 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Orlov has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (262-208). 10-11 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Orlov has a composed117-98 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Ukrainian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Poprad.
The Ukrainian has an aggregate 22-23 win-loss record in 2023, 10-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
The Ukrainian has never competed in this tournament before.
Tommaso Compagnucci
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 41-23 | 0-2 | 38-19 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 30-28 | 0-2 | 30-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2022 | 27-26 | 3-6 | 21-17 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-13 | 7-4 | 15-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 555, Compagnucci reached the qualifications after beating Philip Florig 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Florig (7-5 6-4). During the match Compagnucci scored 70 points vs Florig’s 57. Tommaso was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Compagnucci scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 7 double faults. Tommaso Compagnucci lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Compagnucci put 60% of his first serves in, winning 71% (24/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. Tommaso broke Florig 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Compagnucci’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
The Italian has an overall 21-15 win-loss record in 2023, 21-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Orlov | Compagnucci |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 22 |
Pts | 67-51 | 70-57 |
Total Points | 118 | 127 |
Winners | 23 | 24 |
%Winners | 34% | 34% |
Both Orlov and Compagnucci played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Orlov and Compagnucci have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Orlov played 4 games less than Compagnucci. The Ukrainian scored 23 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Tommaso scored 24 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Orlov | Compagnucci |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 1 |
Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
1st in | 36/57 | 34/57 |
%1st in | 63% | 60% |
1st pts | 23/36 | 24/34 |
%1st pts | 64% | 71% |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/23 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 43% |
Orlov struck 1 ace . Compagnucci also scored 1 ace . Orlov won 64% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Compagnucci won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Orlov | Compagnucci |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 6 |
Converted | 6/13 | 6/9 |
% Converted | 46% | 67% |
Conceded | 9 | 6 |
Saved | 6 | 2 |
% Saved | 67% | 33% |
Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Orlov broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Vladyslav conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Tommaso broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
Orlov | |||
Q1 Pieper |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 67-51 | 67-51 | |
Total points | 118 | 118 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 23/36 | 23/36 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Compagnucci | |||
Q1 Florig |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 70-57 | 70-57 | |
Total points | 127 | 127 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 34/57 | 34/57 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 24/34 | 24/34 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Henri SquireSquire (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Benoit PairePaire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Daniel MasurMasur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Marcelo ZormannZormann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Tommaso CompagnucciCompagnucci (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Kai WehneltWehnelt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Wilson LeiteLeite (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-1) – H2H and prediction