
Roman Andres Burruchaga and Juan Manuel Cerundolo will face off in the 2nd round of the Bordeaux Challenger for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:00 pm on COURT SVR. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Roman Andres Burruchaga who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Roman Andres Burruchaga is the pick to win this match.
Roman Andres Burruchaga -> 1.79
Juan Manuel Cerundolo -> 1.89
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Roman Andres Burruchaga vs. Juan Manuel Cerundolo
This will be the 5th time that Roman Andres Burruchaga and Juan Manuel Cerundolo square off. The head to head is 2-2 (see full H2H stats), 2-1 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Andres Burruchaga won 6-2 6-3 in the quarter in the Costa do Sauipe Challenger back in 2025.
Roman Andres Burruchaga

20 - 11win/loss
56
56
LLLLLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 26-23 | 2-8 | 24-13 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 56-31 | 4-5 | 51-25 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-28 | 2-3 | 40-24 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-30 | 4-2 | 35-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-32 | 5-3 | 40-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 56 (career-high), Roman got to the 2nd round after beating Pierre Delage 6-3 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Argentine defeated Delage (6-3 4-6 6-4). During the match, Andres Burruchaga scored 102 points vs Delage’s 98. The Argentine was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Andres Burruchaga recorded 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Roman Andres Burruchaga lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Andres Burruchaga put 64% of his first serves in, winning 67% (39/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (14/32) on the 2nd serve. Roman broke Delage 6 times after converting 33% of his break points (6/18).
Andres Burruchaga has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (258-170). 18-7 on clay in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Andres Burruchaga has a compiled215-136 record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Sao Paulo Challenger where he overcame Jaime Faria in the final 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4.
Andres Burruchaga has a compiled 20-11 win-loss record in 2026, 18-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bordeaux Challenger
Roman has never competed in this tournament before.
Juan Manuel Cerundolo

15 - 12win/loss
53
42
LLWWLWWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 32-21 | 7-6 | 23-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 49-30 | 10-9 | 39-19 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-28 | 0-3 | 46-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-32 | 4-2 | 37-28 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-17 | 3-6 | 24-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 72, Manuel Cerundolo reached the 2nd round after defeating Luca Van Assche 7-6(2) 6-4.
In the 1st round, Manuel Cerundolo had a good straight sets win against Van Assche (7-62 6-4). During the match Manuel Cerundolo scored 77 points vs Van Assche’s 60. Juan was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Manuel Cerundolo blasted 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Juan Manuel Cerundolo lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Manuel Cerundolo put 48% of his first serves in, winning 67% (22/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (23/36) on the 2nd serve. Juan broke Van Assche 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The Argentine’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Rosario Challenger.
Juan has an aggregate 15-12 win-loss record in 2026, 13-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Andres Burruchaga | Manuel Cerundolo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 23 |
| Pts | 102-98 | 77-60 |
| Total Points | 200 | 137 |
| Winners | 39 | 22 |
| %Winners | 38% | 29% |
Both Andres Burruchaga and Manuel Cerundolo played 1 match. At the moment, Roman Andres Burruchaga dropped 1 set while Juan Manuel Cerundolo hasn’t lost a set so far. Andres Burruchaga has played 1 set more than Manuel Cerundolo (3 vs 2). Therefore, Andres Burruchaga played 6 games more than Manuel Cerundolo. The Argentine scored 39 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Manuel Cerundolo scored 22 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Andres Burruchaga | Manuel Cerundolo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 58/90 | 33/69 |
| %1st in | 64% | 48% |
| 1st pts | 39/58 | 22/33 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 23/36 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 64% |
Andres Burruchaga blasted 2 aces . Manuel Cerundolo recorded 5 aces . Andres Burruchaga won 67% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Manuel Cerundolo won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Andres Burruchaga | Manuel Cerundolo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/18 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 33% | 57% |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 56% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 6 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Argentine dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. The Argentine broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Manuel Cerundolo conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Andres Burruchaga | |||
| R1 Delage |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 102-98 | 102-98 | |
| Total points | 200 | 200 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 58/90 | 58/90 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 39/58 | 39/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 14/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/18 | 6/18 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Manuel Cerundolo | |||
| R1 Van Assche |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 77-60 | 77-60 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/69 | 33/69 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 22/33 | 22/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/36 | 23/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Bordeaux Challenger
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Terence AtmaneAtmane (6-713 6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (7-65 4-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard – Aleksandar VukicVukic (6-0 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Quentin HalysHalys (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – (2-2) – H2H and prediction







