Mitchell Krueger and Tyler Zink will square off in the 2nd round of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.58
Tyler Zink -> 2.2
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Tyler Zink
This will be the 2nd time that Mitchell Krueger and Tyler Zink play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Krueger (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Krueger won 6-1 6-2 in the 1st round in the Salem Challenger back in 2025.
Mitchell Krueger
4 - 10win/loss
372
135
LLWWLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 12-21 | 6-13 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 29-32 | 12-17 | 9-7 | 7-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-31 | 30-17 | 9-7 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 271, the American reached the 2nd round after beating Daniel Dutra Da Silva 2-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Dutra Da Silva, Krueger recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 6-4). During the match, Krueger and Dutra Da Silva scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 271 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Mitchell was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Mitchell Krueger conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Krueger has a losing match record in the last 10 years having won only 49% of his matches (259-265). 1-2 on clay in 2026. . Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Krueger has a compiled 51-56 record in the last years on clay.
Mitchell has an aggregate 4-9 win-loss record in 2026, 1-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Tyler Zink
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 26-26 | 12-14 | 8-5 | 4-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 37-31 | 13-14 | 15-9 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-12 | 13-7 | 9-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 11-11 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 315, Zink got to the 2nd round after beating Joshua Sheehy 6-2 6-4, Thomas Faurel 6-0 6-3 and Saba Purtseladze 4-6 7-6(6) 6-1.
In the 1st round against Purtseladze, Tyler recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-66 6-1). During the match Zink scored 119 points vs Purtseladze’s 101. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Zink struck 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Tyler Zink was pretty efficient on serve to win 72% (34/47) of his 1st serve and 57% (24/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Tyler broke Purtseladze 5 times after converting 28% of his break points (5/18).
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Morelos Challenger.
Tyler has an aggregate 12-10 win-loss record in 2026, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2025. See his history.
//
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 63 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 249-191 |
| Total Points | 0 | 440 |
| Winners | 0 | 84 |
| %Winners | 0% | 34% |
Krueger played 1 match while Zink competed in 3 matches. Zink started his run from the qualifications while Krueger had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Mitchell Krueger conceded 1 set, while Tyler Zink conceded 1 set. Krueger has played 4 set(s) less than Zink (3 vs 7). Therefore, Krueger played 36 games less than Zink. Mitchell scored 0 winners (0% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 84 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 122/200 |
| %1st in | 0% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 84/122 |
| %1st pts | 0% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 49/78 |
| %2nd pts | 0% | 63% |
Krueger didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Zink managed to score 13 aces (4.3 per match). Krueger won 0% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 0% of the points. On the other side, Zink won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 13 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 13/33 |
| % Converted | 0% | 39% |
| Conceded | 0 | 11 |
| Saved | 0 | 7 |
| % Saved | 0% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The American hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. The American had a solid display on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. The American broke his opponents 13 times with a 39% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| R1 Dutra Da Silva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | % | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Zink | |||||
| Q1 Sheehy |
Q3 Faurel |
R1 Purtseladze |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-0 6-3 | 4-6 7-66 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 15 | 30 | 63 | |
| pts | 60-41 | 70-49 | 119-101 | 249-191 | |
| Total points | 101 | 119 | 220 | 440 | |
| Winners | 26 | 24 | 34 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 34% | 29% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 7 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/46 | 40/65 | 47/89 | 122/200 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 62% | 53% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 24/40 | 34/47 | 84/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 60% | 72% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/11 | 15/25 | 24/42 | 49/78 | |
| % 2nd pts | 91% | 60% | 57% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 5/10 | 5/18 | 13/33 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 50% | 28% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/3 | 5/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 63% | 130% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Tallahassee Challenger
- Hynek BartonBarton – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Alex RybakovRybakov (2-6 7-5 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael MmohMmoh – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (4-6 7-64 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Liam DraxlDraxl (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
