Hynek Barton and Garrett Johns will face off in the 2nd round of the Tallahassee Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hynek Barton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hynek Barton is the pick to win this match.
Hynek Barton -> 1.45
Garrett Johns -> 2.51
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Hynek Barton vs. Garrett Johns
There is no head to head record between Hynek Barton and Garrett Johns since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Hynek Barton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 42-26 | 3-3 | 35-21 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 48-28 | 17-10 | 30-17 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-23 | 9-4 | 21-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 45-26 | 11-5 | 25-16 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 296, Barton got to the 2nd round after beating Keaton Hance 6-4 7-5, Quinn Vandecasteele 6-2 6-3 and Bruno Kuzuhara 4-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Kuzuhara, Barton recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-3). During the match, Barton scored 105 points vs Kuzuhara’s 97. Barton was very aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Barton managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Hynek Barton lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Barton put 56% of his first serves in, winning 81% (44/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (20/42) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Kuzuhara twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Barton has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 64% of his matches (157-89). 13-3 on clay in 2026. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Barton has an overall102-53 record in the last 5 years on clay.
Barton’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Foggia.
Hynek has an aggregate 20-8 win-loss record in 2026, 13-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tallahassee Challenger
Hynek has never competed in this tournament before.
Garrett Johns
11 - 10win/loss
442
279
LWLWWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 28-25 | 11-10 | 15-11 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 54-31 | 33-19 | 21-10 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-23 | 16-12 | 13-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-16 | 29-11 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-8 | 13-4 | 6-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 392, Garrett got to the 2nd round after defeating Ronald Hohmann 6-2 6-4, Daniel Dutra Da Silva 7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(5) and Colton Smith 7-6(6) 6-1.
In the 1st round, Garrett had a good straight sets win against Smith (7-66 6-1). During the match Johns scored 75 points vs Smith’s 62. Garrett was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Johns was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Garrett Johns lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Johns put 68% of his first serves in, winning 64% (30/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. Garrett broke Smith 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Johns has a compiled 11-9 win-loss record in 2026, 7-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
//
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Barton | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 68 | 72 |
| Pts | 256-223 | 238-210 |
| Total Points | 479 | 448 |
| Winners | 110 | 89 |
| %Winners | 43% | 37% |
Both Barton and Johns played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Hynek Barton lost 1 set, while Garrett Johns conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Barton and Johns have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Barton played 4 games less than Johns. Barton scored 110 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Johns struck 89 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Barton | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2 |
| 1st in | 146/238 | 139/221 |
| %1st in | 61% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 110/146 | 89/139 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 43/92 | 51/82 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 62% |
Barton bagged 12 aces (4 per match). Johns managed to score 6 aces (2 per match). Barton won 75% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Johns won 64% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Barton | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 12 |
| Converted | 10/25 | 12/25 |
| % Converted | 40% | 48% |
| Conceded | 20 | 16 |
| Saved | 17 | 7 |
| % Saved | 85% | 44% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 9 |
Hynek broke his opponents 10 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Czech surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded. Garrett broke his opponents 12 times with a 48% conversion rate. Garrett conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded.
| Barton | |||||
| Q1 Hance |
Q3 Vandecasteele |
R1 Kuzuhara |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | 6-2 6-3 | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 17 | 29 | 68 | |
| pts | 84-72 | 67-54 | 105-97 | 256-223 | |
| Total points | 156 | 121 | 202 | 479 | |
| Winners | 39 | 27 | 44 | 110 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 40% | 42% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 7 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 53/83 | 39/59 | 54/96 | 146/238 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 66% | 56% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 39/53 | 27/39 | 44/54 | 110/146 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 69% | 81% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 8/20 | 20/42 | 43/92 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 40% | 48% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 5/9 | 2/7 | 10/25 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 56% | 29% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 6 | 7 | 20 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 5/6 | 6/7 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 83% | 86% | 85% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| Johns | |||||
| Q1 Hohmann |
Q3 Dutra Da Silva |
R1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-64 2-6 7-65 | 7-66 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 34 | 20 | 72 | |
| pts | 65-45 | 98-103 | 75-62 | 238-210 | |
| Total points | 110 | 201 | 137 | 448 | |
| Winners | 23 | 36 | 30 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 37% | 40% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 30/45 | 62/107 | 47/69 | 139/221 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 58% | 68% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 36/62 | 30/47 | 89/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 58% | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 27/45 | 13/22 | 51/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 60% | 59% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/5 | 4/11 | 12/25 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 80% | 36% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 | 6 | 16 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/8 | 4/6 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 25% | 67% | 47% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 | 2 | 9 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Tallahassee Challenger
- Clement TaburTabur – Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg (6-1 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack KennedyKennedy – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (3-6 6-4 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Tyler ZinkZink – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (4-6 7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Hynek BartonBarton – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Stefan KozlovKozlov (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Colton SmithSmith (7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Stefan DostanicDostanic (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Kaylan BigunBigun (3-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Stefan KozlovKozlov (7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Stefan DostanicDostanic (6-2 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack KennedyKennedy – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (3-6 6-4 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg (6-1 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Tyler ZinkZink – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (4-6 7-6(6) 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Garrett JohnsJohns – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
