Kimmer Coppejans and Maxim Mrva will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Split Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 10:30 am on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maxim Mrva who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Maxim Mrva is the pick to win this match.
Maxim Mrva -> 1.69
Kimmer Coppejans -> 2.02
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kimmer Coppejans vs. Maxim Mrva
This will be the 2nd time that Kimmer Coppejans and Maxim Mrva square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Coppejans (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Coppejans won 6-2 6-3 in the qualifications in the Lille Challenger back in February 2026.
Kimmer Coppejans
11 - 7win/loss
227
97
LWLLLLWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 37-27 | 5-6 | 29-18 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 46-29 | 20-10 | 24-16 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-8 | 22-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 244, Kimmer reached the 2nd round after beating Oleksii Krutykh 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Coppejans had a good straight sets win against Krutykh (6-3 6-2). During the match, Coppejans scored 58 points vs Krutykh’s 35. Kimmer was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Coppejans managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Kimmer Coppejans was pretty efficient on serve to win 71% (22/31) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kimmer broke Krutykh 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Coppejans has good record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (318-234). 4-1 on clay in 2026. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Coppejans has an aggregate 215-148 match record in the last years on clay.
The Belgian’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Murcia Challenger.
The Belgian has a compiled 11-7 win-loss record in 2026, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Split Challenger
Maxim Mrva
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 32-26 | 7-4 | 23-19 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2025 | 38-25 | 14-6 | 23-18 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 10-8 | 2-3 | 8-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 271 (career-high), the Czech reached the 2nd round after defeating Daniel Rincon 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Mrva had a good straight sets win against Rincon (6-4 6-4). During the match Mrva scored 68 points vs Rincon’s 54. Maxim was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Mrva scored 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Maxim Mrva lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Mrva put 52% of his first serves in, winning 69% (20/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the 2nd serve. Maxim broke Rincon 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Mrva’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Hersonissos 2 Challenger.
Maxim has a compiled 10-7 win-loss record in 2026, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
//
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Coppejans | Mrva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 |
| Pts | 58-35 | 68-54 |
| Total Points | 93 | 122 |
| Winners | 22 | 20 |
| %Winners | 38% | 29% |
Both Coppejans and Mrva played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Coppejans and Mrva have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Coppejans played 3 games less than Mrva. Coppejans scored 22 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Maxim fired 20 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Coppejans | Mrva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 31/49 | 29/56 |
| %1st in | 63% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 20/29 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 14/27 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 52% |
Coppejans bagged 3 aces . Mrva struck 3 aces . Coppejans won 71% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Mrva won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Coppejans | Mrva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 80% | 56% |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 50% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Coppejans broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Coppejans dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Mrva conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded.
| Coppejans | |||
| R1 Krutykh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-35 | 58-35 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/49 | 31/49 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 22/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 12/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Mrva | |||
| R1 Rincon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 68-54 | 68-54 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 29/56 | 29/56 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 20/29 | 20/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 14/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Split Challenger
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (2-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Matej DodigDodig – Sandro KoppKopp (6-4 3-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mili PoljicakPoljicak – Felix GillGill (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrej NedicNedic – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (7-610 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
