Toby Samuel and Semen Pankin will square off in the 2nd round of the Manama 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Toby Samuel who should win in 2 sets.
Toby Samuel -> 1.26
Semen Pankin -> 3.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Toby Samuel vs. Semen Pankin
There is no head to head record between Toby Samuel and Semen Pankin since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Toby Samuel
53 - 16win/loss
329
329
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53-16 | 45-11 | 3-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-14 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 8-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-5 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 329 (career-high), Samuel reached the 2nd round after defeating Colin Sinclair 6-3 6-0.
In the 1st round, Samuel had a good straight sets win against Sinclair (6-3 6-0). During the match, Samuel scored 58 points vs Sinclair’s 28. Toby was very aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Regarding the service games, Samuel made 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Toby Samuel was exceptionally effective on serve to win 89% (16/18) of his 1st serve and 81% (17/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Toby broke Sinclair 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Samuel has a fantastic match record in the last 5 years having won 73% of his matches (99-37). 45-11 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Samuel has an aggregate64-17 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Soma Bay Challenger where he overcame Jay Clarke in the final 4-6 7-6(4) 6-0.
The Brit has an aggregate 53-16 win-loss record in 2025, 45-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Manama 2 Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Semen Pankin
39 - 21win/loss
746
676
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-21 | 24-11 | 15-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-10 | 8-4 | 18-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 10-8 | 8-5 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 746, Semen reached the 2nd round after defeating Yusuf Qaed 6-1 6-2, Colin Sinclair 6-4 6-4 and Olaf Pieczkowski 6-4 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Pieczkowski (6-4 7-65). During the match Pankin scored 91 points vs Pieczkowski’s 84. Pankin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Pankin scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Semen Pankin lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Pankin put 52% of his first serves in, winning 82% (32/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (18/36) on the 2nd serve. Semen broke Pieczkowski twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
The Russian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Kayseri.
Pankin has an overall 39-21 win-loss record in 2025, 24-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Samuel | Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 58 |
| Pts | 58-28 | 213-169 |
| Total Points | 86 | 382 |
| Winners | 16 | 70 |
| %Winners | 28% | 33% |
Samuel played 1 match while Pankin competed in 3 matches. Pankin started his run from the qualifications while Samuel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Samuel has played 4 set(s) less than Pankin (2 vs 6). Therefore, Samuel played 43 games less than Pankin. Toby scored 16 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Pankin recorded 70 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Samuel | Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 18/39 | 89/174 |
| %1st in | 46% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 16/18 | 70/89 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | 50/85 |
| %2nd pts | 81% | 59% |
Samuel bagged 3 aces . Pankin managed to score 7 aces (2.3 per match). Samuel won 89% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 81% of the points. On the other side, Pankin won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Samuel | Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 10 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 10/21 |
| % Converted | 50% | 48% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Samuel broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Toby was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Pankin broke his opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Russian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Samuel | |||
| R1 Sinclair | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 58-28 | 58-28 | |
| Total points | 86 | 86 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 18/39 | 18/39 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 16/18 | 16/18 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | 17/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 81% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Pankin | |||||
| Q1 Ebrahim Ahmed Abdulla Qaed | Q3 Sinclair | R1 Pieczkowski | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 20 | 23 | 58 | |
| pts | 61-34 | 61-51 | 91-84 | 213-169 | |
| Total points | 95 | 112 | 175 | 382 | |
| Winners | 15 | 23 | 32 | 70 | |
| %Winners | 25% | 38% | 35% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 5 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 17/43 | 33/56 | 39/75 | 89/174 | |
| % 1st in | 40% | 59% | 52% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 15/17 | 23/33 | 32/39 | 70/89 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 70% | 82% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/23 | 18/36 | 50/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 70% | 50% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 3/3 | 2/10 | 10/21 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 100% | 20% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1/2 | 3/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | 75% | 175% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Manama 2 Challenger
- Matisse BobichonBobichon – Fares ZakariaZakaria (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ivan Marrero CurbeloMarrero Curbelo – Vladislav MelnicMelnic (3-6 7-66 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Eero VasaVasa (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Dominik KellovskyKellovsky (3-6 6-1 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – Mathys ErhardErhard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan Marrero CurbeloMarrero Curbelo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction