Michael Geerts and Jan Kumstat will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Athens Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:30 am on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Geerts who should win in 3 sets.
Michael Geerts -> 1.55
Jan Kumstat -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Michael Geerts vs. Jan Kumstat
There is no head to head record between Michael Geerts and Jan Kumstat since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Michael Geerts
37 - 34win/loss
372
212
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-34 | 23-15 | 10-14 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-37 | 18-11 | 10-12 | 17-13 | 0-1 | 5-0 |
| 2023 | 32-39 | 13-10 | 13-19 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 42-37 | 5-8 | 24-14 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 13-7 | 14-14 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 372, Geerts got to the 2nd round after beating Giles Hussey 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Michael had a good straight sets win against Hussey (6-2 6-1). During the match, Geerts scored 56 points vs Hussey’s 34. Michael was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Geerts struck 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Michael Geerts lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Geerts put 58% of his first serves in, winning 92% (24/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 32% (6/19) on the 2nd serve. Geerts broke Hussey 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Geerts has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (320-253). 23-15 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Geerts has an aggregate 130-85 match record in the last years on hard.
The Belgian’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Loule and the Abidjan 2 Challenger.
Geerts has a compiled 37-34 win-loss record in 2025, 23-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Athens Challenger
Michael has never competed in this tournament before.
Jan Kumstat
24 - 17win/loss
711
695
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-17 | 7-6 | 17-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2024 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 711, Kumstat reached the 2nd round after beating Andrin Casanova 6-0 6-1 and Maks Kasnikowski 7-5 4-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Czech defeated Kasnikowski (7-5 4-6 6-1). During the match Kumstat scored 93 points vs Kasnikowski’s 78. Kumstat was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Kumstat made 11 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jan Kumstat lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Kumstat put 60% of his first serves in, winning 81% (42/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. Kumstat broke Kasnikowski 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Jan’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Segrate and M15 Slovenska Bistrica.
The Czech has a composed 24-17 win-loss record in 2025, 7-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Geerts | Kumstat |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 42 |
| Pts | 56-34 | 141-99 |
| Total Points | 90 | 240 |
| Winners | 24 | 61 |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% |
Geerts played 1 match while Kumstat competed in 2 matches. Kumstat started his run from the qualifications while Geerts had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jan Kumstat dropped 1 set while Michael Geerts hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Geerts has played 3 set(s) less than Kumstat (2 vs 5). Therefore, Geerts played 27 games less than Kumstat. Geerts scored 24 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Kumstat blasted 61 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Geerts | Kumstat |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 8.5 |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 73/122 |
| %1st in | 58% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 24/26 | 61/73 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 6/19 | 26/49 |
| %2nd pts | 32% | 53% |
Geerts fired 3 aces . Kumstat blasted 17 aces (8.5 per match). Geerts won 92% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 32% of the points. On the other side, Kumstat won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Geerts | Kumstat |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 9 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 9/18 |
| % Converted | 60% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 80% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Belgian broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Belgian surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponents 9 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Geerts | |||
| R1 Hussey | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 56-34 | 56-34 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 26/45 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/26 | 24/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/19 | 6/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 32% | 32% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kumstat | ||||
| Q3 Casanova | R1 Kasnikowski | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 29 | 42 | |
| pts | 48-21 | 93-78 | 141-99 | |
| Total points | 69 | 171 | 240 | |
| Winners | 19 | 42 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 45% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 11 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 21/36 | 52/86 | 73/122 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | 42/52 | 61/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 81% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 17/34 | 26/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 50% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/11 | 9/18 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 36% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Athens Challenger
- Sandro KoppKopp – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (6-0 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Philip HenningHenning – James StoryStory (7-61 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos – Michele RibecaiRibecai (6-1 3-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sergio Callejon HernandoCallejon Hernando – Menelaos EfstathiouEfstathiou (6-2 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandr BrayninBraynin – Nikolay VylegzhaninVylegzhanin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Philip HenningHenning – Sandro KoppKopp (0-0) – H2H and prediction