Jason Murray Kubler and Carl Emil Overbeck will square off in the 2nd round of the Playford Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Murray Kubler who should win in 2 sets.
Jason Murray Kubler -> 1.33
Carl Emil Overbeck -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jason Murray Kubler vs. Carl Emil Overbeck
There is no head to head record between Jason Murray Kubler and Carl Emil Overbeck since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jason Murray Kubler
39 - 15win/loss
188
63
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-15 | 30-12 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-19 | 10-9 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-22 | 17-10 | 20-5 | 4-5 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-15 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 188, Jason got to the 2nd round after beating Li Tu 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Tu (6-3 6-3). During the match, Murray Kubler scored 56 points vs Tu’s 40. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Murray Kubler made 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Jason Murray Kubler was pretty effective on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Murray Kubler was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Tu 4 times.
Murray Kubler has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 66% of his matches (259-131). 30-12 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Murray Kubler has a composed 160-76 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Gwangju Challenger where he overcame Alibek Kachmazov in the final 7-5 6-7(7) 6-3.
Jason has an aggregate 39-15 win-loss record in 2025, 30-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Playford Challenger
Carl Emil Overbeck
31 - 14win/loss
597
597
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-14 | 19-4 | 9-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-5 | 0-2 | 12-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 3-3 | 3-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 597 (career-high), Carl reached the 2nd round after defeating Naoki Tajima 6-2 6-2, Masamichi Imamura 6-4 5-7 6-1 and Matthew Dellavedova 3-6 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round against Dellavedova, Carl recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-2). During the match Emil Overbeck scored 97 points vs Dellavedova’s 92. The Dane was pretty aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Emil Overbeck fired 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Carl Emil Overbeck lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Emil Overbeck put 69% of his first serves in, winning 80% (43/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. The Dane broke Dellavedova 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Emil Overbeck’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Alkmaar and M25 Brisbane.
The Dane has a composed 31-14 win-loss record in 2025, 19-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Murray Kubler | Emil Overbeck |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 74 |
| Pts | 56-40 | 259-211 |
| Total Points | 96 | 470 |
| Winners | 25 | 98 |
| %Winners | 45% | 38% |
Murray Kubler played 1 match while Emil Overbeck competed in 3 matches. Emil Overbeck started his run from the qualifications while Murray Kubler had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Carl Emil Overbeck surrendered 2 sets while Jason Murray Kubler hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Murray Kubler has played 6 set(s) less than Emil Overbeck (2 vs 8). Therefore, Murray Kubler played 56 games less than Emil Overbeck. The Australian scored 25 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Emil Overbeck made 98 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Murray Kubler | Emil Overbeck |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 31/45 | 130/209 |
| %1st in | 69% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 98/130 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 41/79 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 52% |
Murray Kubler struck 4 aces . Emil Overbeck recorded 19 aces (6.3 per match). Murray Kubler won 81% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Emil Overbeck won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Murray Kubler | Emil Overbeck |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 15 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 15/37 |
| % Converted | 100% | 41% |
| Conceded | 1 | 15 |
| Saved | 0 | 8 |
| % Saved | 0% | 53% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 7 |
Jason broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Murray Kubler lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Emil Overbeck broke his opponents 15 times with a 41% conversion rate. Carl conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 53% of the break points that he conceded.
| Murray Kubler | |||
| R1 Tu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 56-40 | 56-40 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/45 | 31/45 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 25/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Emil Overbeck | |||||
| Q1 Tajima | Q3 Imamura | R1 Dellavedova | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 29 | 29 | 74 | |
| pts | 56-27 | 106-92 | 97-92 | 259-211 | |
| Total points | 83 | 198 | 189 | 470 | |
| Winners | 20 | 35 | 43 | 98 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 33% | 44% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 9 | 6 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 8 | 4 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 23/37 | 53/94 | 54/78 | 130/209 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 56% | 69% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 20/23 | 35/53 | 43/54 | 98/130 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 66% | 80% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/14 | 18/41 | 11/24 | 41/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 86% | 44% | 46% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 7 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 7/17 | 4/13 | 15/37 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 41% | 31% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 12 | 3 | 15 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 7/12 | 1/3 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 58% | 33% | 91% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
Tennis Scores in Playford Challenger
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Bernard TomicTomic (3-6 7-64 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Karan SinghSingh (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dane SweenySweeny – Hikaru ShiraishiShiraishi (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tai SachSach – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction