Toby Samuel and Peter Fajta will play each other in the 2^nd round of the Soma Bay Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 6:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Toby Samuel who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Toby Samuel is the pick to win this match.
Toby Samuel -> 1.29
Peter Fajta -> 3.2

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Toby Samuel vs. Peter Fajta

There is no head to head record between Toby Samuel and Peter Fajta since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.

Toby Samuel

Ranked no. 436, the Brit got to the 2^nd round after defeating Ilia Simakin 6-4 6-4.

In the 1^st round, Samuel had a good straight sets win against Simakin (6-4 6-4). During the match, Samuel scored 72 points vs Simakin’s 65. Toby was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.

Regarding the service games, Samuel scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Toby Samuel lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Samuel put 68% of his first serves in, winning 64% (28/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Simakin 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).

Samuel has a fantastic record in the last 5 years having won 72% of his matches (94-37). 40-11 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Samuel has a composed59-17 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.

The Brit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Aldershot,M15 Hurghada,M15 Malta and M15 Sharm ElSheikh.

The Brit has a composed 48-16 win-loss record in 2025, 40-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Soma Bay Challenger

Samuel has never competed in this tournament before.

Peter Fajta

Ranked no. 563, Peter reached the 2^nd round after beating Matteo Fondriest 6-3 6-4 and Dali Blanch 6-1 6-4.

In the 1^st round, Peter had a good straight sets win against Blanch (6-1 6-4). During the match Fajta scored 59 points vs Blanch’s 42. Peter was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.

About the serving games, Fajta scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Peter Fajta was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Fajta broke Blanch 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).

The Hungarian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Gyula,M15 Nyiregyhaza,M15 Bielsko Biala and M15 Szabolcsveresmart.

The Hungarian has a composed 33-15 win-loss record in 2025, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Samuel	Fajta
Match played	1	2
Tot Set	2	4
Tot Games	20	36
Pts	72-65	133-103
Total Points	137	236
Winners	28	59
%Winners	39%	44%

Samuel played 1 match while Fajta competed in 2 matches. Fajta started his run from the qualifications while Samuel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Samuel has played 2 set(s) less than Fajta (2 vs 4). Therefore, Samuel played 16 games less than Fajta. The Brit scored 28 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Peter scored 59 winners (44%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Samuel	Fajta
Aces	1	1
Avg per match	1	0.5
1st in	44/65	71/109
%1st in	68%	65%
1st pts	28/44	59/71
%1st pts	64%	83%
2nd pts	14/21	21/38
%2nd pts	67%	55%

Samuel scored 1 ace . Fajta also fired 1 ace (0.5 per match). Samuel won 64% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Fajta won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Samuel	Fajta
Won	3	5
Converted	3/10	5/19
% Converted	30%	26%
Conceded	3	4
Saved	2	4
% Saved	67%	100%
Times Broken	1	0

The Brit broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Samuel lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Fajta broke his opponents 5 times with a 26% conversion rate. Fajta was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.

Samuel
	R1 Simakin	Total
Score	6-4 6-4
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	20	20
pts	72-65	72-65
Total points	137	137
Winners	28	28
%Winners	39%	39%
SERVE
Aces	1	1
Double Faults	3	3
1st in	44/65	44/65
% 1st in	68%	68%
1st pts	28/44	28/44
% 1st pts	64%	64%
2nd pts	14/21	14/21
% 2nd pts	67%	67%
Breaks
Won	3	3
Converted	3/10	3/10
Converted %	30%	30%
Conceded	3	3
Saved	2/3	2
Saved %	67%	67%
Times Broken	1	1

Fajta
	Q3 Fondriest	R1 Blanch	Total
Score	6-3 6-4	6-1 6-4
Tot Set	2	2	4
Tot Games	19	17	36
pts	74-61	59-42	133-103
Total points	135	101	236
Winners	34	25	59
%Winners	46%	42%	44%
SERVE
Aces	0	1	1
Double Faults	4	2	6
1st in	40/58	31/51	71/109
% 1st in	69%	61%	65%
1st pts	34/40	25/31	59/71
% 1st pts	85%	81%	83%
2nd pts	9/18	12/20	21/38
% 2nd pts	50%	60%	55%
Breaks
Won	2	3	5
Converted	2/15	3/4	5/19
Converted %	13%	75%	26%
Conceded	3	1	4
Saved	3/3	1/1	4
Saved %	100%	100%	200%
Times Broken	0	0	0

Tennis Scores in Soma Bay Challenger

• Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Sebastian SorgerSorger (5-7 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
• Vadym UrsuUrsu – Egor AgafonovAgafonov (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
• Dominik KellovskyKellovsky – Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov (7-6⁴ 7-6³) – See score progression
• Alexandr BindaBinda – Yurii DzhavakianDzhavakian (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
• Maxim MrvaMrva – Pedro Vives MarcosVives Marcos (4-6 6-2 ret.) – See score progression
• Radu AlbotAlbot – Vladyslav OrlovOrlov (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
• Charlie RobertsonRobertson – Amr ElsayedElsayed (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
• Jannik OpitzOpitz – Mert AlkayaAlkaya (6-5 ret.) – See score progression
• Jelle SelsSels – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
• Pedro Vives MarcosVives Marcos – Maxim MrvaMrva (6-4 2-6 ret. (Marcos ret.)) – See score progression
• Mathys ErhardErhard – Matthew SummersSummers (7-6⁵ 7-6¹) – See score progression
• Peter FajtaFajta – Dali BlanchBlanch (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
• Giles HusseyHussey – Henry BernetBernet (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Jay ClarkeClarke – Fares ZakariaZakaria (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
• Toby SamuelSamuel – Ilia SimakinSimakin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Michael Bassem SobhyBassem Sobhy – Mirza BasicBasic (6-3 6-7⁵ 7-6⁶) – See score progression
• Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Sebastian SorgerSorger (5-7 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
• Mathys ErhardErhard – Matthew SummersSummers (7-6(5) 7-6(1)) – See score progression
• Vadym UrsuUrsu – Egor AgafonovAgafonov (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
• Jelle SelsSels – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
• Jannik OpitzOpitz – Mert AlkayaAlkaya (6-5 ret.) – See score progression
• Charlie RobertsonRobertson – Amr ElsayedElsayed (3-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
• Dominik KellovskyKellovsky – Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov (7-6(4) 7-6(3)) – See score progression
• Alexandr BindaBinda – Yurii DzhavakianDzhavakian (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
• Peter FajtaFajta – Dali BlanchBlanch (6-1 6-4) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Radu AlbotAlbot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Jelle SelsSels – Jannik OpitzOpitz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Jay ClarkeClarke – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Vadym UrsuUrsu – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Pietro Orlando FellinOrlando Fellin (0-0) – H2H and prediction