Jake Delaney and Carl Emil Overbeck will fight against each other in the 1st round of the Sydney Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Carl Emil Overbeck who should win in 3 sets.
Carl Emil Overbeck -> 1.57
Jake Delaney -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jake Delaney vs. Carl Emil Overbeck
This will be the 2nd time that Jake Delaney and Carl Emil Overbeck fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Emil (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Emil won 6-3 6-2 in the 1st round in the Sydney Challenger back in November 2025.
Jake Delaney
49 - 27win/loss
461
434
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 49-27 | 42-23 | 3-1 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 40-31 | 38-28 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-27 | 34-21 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 8-10 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 461, Delaney got to the 1st round after beating Finn Bass 6-2 6-4, Joshua Charlton 7-5 7-6(4) and Carl Emil Overbeck 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Dane had a good straight sets win against Delaney (6-3 6-2). During the match, Delaney and Delaney scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 461 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Dane was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Talking about the service games, Delaney wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Jake Delaney conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Delaney has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 55% of his matches (198-161). 42-22 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Delaney has an aggregate178-139 record in the last 9 years on hard.
The Dane’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Nakhon Pathom.
The Dane has an overall 49-26 win-loss record in 2025, 42-22 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sydney Challenger
Carl Emil Overbeck
28 - 13win/loss
649
649
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-13 | 16-3 | 9-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-5 | 0-2 | 12-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 3-3 | 3-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 649 (career-high), Emil got to the 1st round after beating Alexander Klintcharov 6-3 6-2, Pavle Marinkov 6-4 6-4 and Jake Delaney 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Carl had a good straight sets win against Delaney (6-3 6-2). During the match Emil and Delaney scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 461 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Emil was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
Talking about serving, Emil couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Carl Emil Overbeck conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
The Dane’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Alkmaar and M25 Brisbane.
The Dane has an overall 28-13 win-loss record in 2025, 16-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sydney Challenger
The Dane has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Delaney | Emil |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 43 | 54 |
| Pts | 138-117 | 132-106 |
| Total Points | 255 | 238 |
| Winners | 68 | 55 |
| %Winners | 49% | 42% |
Delaney played 2 matches while Emil competed in 3 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Delaney has played 2 set(s) less than Emil (4 vs 6). Therefore, Delaney played 11 games less than Emil. Delaney scored 68 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Carl bagged 55 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Delaney | Emil |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 25 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 12.5 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 78/135 | 68/118 |
| %1st in | 58% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 68/78 | 55/68 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 28/57 | 25/50 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 50% |
Delaney struck 25 aces (12.5 per match). Emil scored 11 aces (3.7 per match). Delaney won 87% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Emil won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Delaney | Emil |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 80% | 58% |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 |
| Saved | 5 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Jake broke his opponents 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Delaney very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 5 break points. The Dane broke his opponents 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Carl conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Delaney | ||||||||||||
| Q1 Bass | Q3 Charlton | R1 Delaney | R1 Delaney | R1 Delaney | R1 Delaney | R1 Delaney | R1 Delaney | R1 Delaney | R1 Delaney | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 7-64 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 20 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 25 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 179 | |
| pts | 65-48 | 73-69 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 138-117 | |
| Total points | 113 | 142 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 255 | |
| Winners | 27 | 41 | 68 | |||||||||
| %Winners | 42% | 56% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 49% | |
| SERVE | ||||||||||||
| Aces | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 5 | 11 | |||||||||
| 1st in | 29/56 | 49/79 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 78/135 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 62% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 27/29 | 41/49 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 68/78 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 84% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 16/30 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 28/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 53% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||||||||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||
| Converted | 3/4 | 1/1 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||
| Saved | 4/4 | 1/1 | 0/ | 0/ | 0/ | 0/ | 0/ | 0/ | 0/ | 0/ | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| Emil | ||||||||||||
| Q1 Klintcharov | Q3 Marinkov | R1 Delaney | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | |||||||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | ||||||||
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 | 17 | 54 | ||||||||
| pts | 66-48 | 66-58 | – | 132-106 | ||||||||
| Total points | 114 | 124 | 0 | 238 | ||||||||
| Winners | 28 | 27 | 55 | |||||||||
| %Winners | 42% | 41% | 0% | 42% | ||||||||
| SERVE | ||||||||||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 0 | 11 | ||||||||
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||
| 1st in | 34/60 | 34/58 | / | 68/118 | ||||||||
| % 1st in | 57% | 59% | 0% | 58% | ||||||||
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 27/34 | / | 55/68 | ||||||||
| % 1st pts | 82% | 79% | 0% | 81% | ||||||||
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 11/24 | / | 25/50 | ||||||||
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 46% | 0% | 50% | ||||||||
| Breaks | ||||||||||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |||||||||
| Converted | 3/5 | 4/7 | / | 7/12 | ||||||||
| Converted % | 60% | 57% | 0% | 58% | ||||||||
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | |||||||||
| Saved | 4/4 | 3/5 | 0/ | 7 | ||||||||
| Saved % | 100% | 60% | – | 16% | ||||||||
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
Tennis Scores in Sydney Challenger
- Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Carl Emil OverbeckEmil Overbeck – Jake DelaneyDelaney (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Carl Emil OverbeckEmil Overbeck – Jake DelaneyDelaney (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dane SweenySweeny – Christian LangmoLangmo (2-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-4 3-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Bernard TomicTomic (6-4 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Karan SinghSingh – Aryan ShahShah (7-62 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James McCabeMcCabe – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tai SachSach – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (2-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Li TuTu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – Shinji HazawaHazawa (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Takuya KumasakaKumasaka – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction