Milos Karol and Niels Visker will play each other in the qualifications of the Bergamo Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Milos Karol who should win in 2 sets.
Milos Karol -> 1.38
Niels Visker -> 2.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Milos Karol vs. Niels Visker
This will be the 2nd time that Milos Karol and Niels Visker play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Karol (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Karol won 6-3 7-6(6) in the semifinal in M15 Trnava back in 2024.
Milos Karol
33 - 28win/loss
449
356
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-28 | 4-4 | 20-14 | 9-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 53-31 | 8-5 | 21-17 | 24-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 28-27 | 3-2 | 11-13 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 6-24 | 3-5 | 1-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-18 | 0-0 | 10-11 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 423, the Slovakian got to the qualifications after beating Filip Pieczonka 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Milos had a good straight sets win against Pieczonka (6-2 6-4). During the match, Karol scored 59 points vs Pieczonka’s 44. The Slovakian was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Karol made 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Milos Karol was quite efficient on serve to win 83% (24/29) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Slovakian broke Pieczonka 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Karol has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 52% of his matches (144-131). 9-10 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Karol has an aggregate59-41 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Karol’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Warmbad Villach.
Milos has an aggregate 33-28 win-loss record in 2025, 9-10 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bergamo Challenger
Milos has never competed in this tournament before.
Niels Visker
26 - 28win/loss
697
496
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-28 | 5-7 | 15-15 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2024 | 52-30 | 16-7 | 20-15 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 45-27 | 19-11 | 26-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 28-16 | 7-2 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 688, Niels got to the qualifications after defeating Nikolay Vylegzhanin 7-6(5) 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Vylegzhanin (7-65 6-2). During the match Visker scored 84 points vs Vylegzhanin’s 72. Niels was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Visker bagged 12 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Niels Visker was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 71% (36/51) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Visker broke Vylegzhanin 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Niels has a composed 26-28 win-loss record in 2025, 5-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Karol | Visker |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 21 |
| Pts | 59-44 | 84-72 |
| Total Points | 103 | 156 |
| Winners | 24 | 36 |
| %Winners | 41% | 43% |
Both Karol and Visker played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Karol and Visker have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Karol played 3 games less than Visker. The Slovakian scored 24 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Visker made 36 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Karol | Visker |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 12 |
| 1st in | 29/56 | 51/78 |
| %1st in | 52% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 36/51 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 59% |
Karol struck 8 aces . Visker managed to score 12 aces . Karol won 83% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Visker won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Karol | Visker |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/12 |
| % Converted | 75% | 25% |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Karol broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Karol quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 3 break points. The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Visker conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Karol | |||
| Q1 Pieczonka | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 59-44 | 59-44 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/56 | 29/56 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 24/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Visker | |||
| Q1 Vylegzhanin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 84-72 | 84-72 | |
| Total points | 156 | 156 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 51/78 | 51/78 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 36/51 | 36/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Alexander DonskiDonski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hamish StewartStewart – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-0) – H2H and prediction