Tung-Lin Wu and Carl Emil Overbeck will clash against each other in the quarter of the Brisbane 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 12:30 pm on SHOW COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 3 sets.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.52
Carl Emil Overbeck -> 2.33
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tung-Lin Wu vs. Carl Emil Overbeck
There is no head to head record between Tung-Lin Wu and Carl Emil Overbeck since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Tung-Lin Wu
20 - 24win/loss
390
158
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-25 | 19-17 | 3-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-43 | 32-40 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 21-21 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-24 | 26-14 | 6-3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-26 | 10-10 | 2-8 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 518, the Chinese got to the quarter after beating Noah Brownrigg 6-3 6-3, Kosuke Ogura 6-3 6-2, Christian Langmo 7-6(5) 6-4 and Cruz Hewitt 3-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Hewitt, The Chinese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-4). During the match, Wu scored 87 points vs Hewitt’s 85. Tung-Lin was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wu blasted 4 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Tung-Lin Wu was pretty effective on serve to win 71% (39/55) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Tung-Lin broke Hewitt 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Tung-Lin started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Wu has good match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (266-238). 17-16 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wu has an aggregate 203-167 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Chinese has an aggregate 20-24 win-loss record in 2025, 17-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 3 Challenger
Tung-Lin has never competed in this tournament before.
Carl Emil Overbeck
25 - 12win/loss
649
649
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-13 | 15-3 | 9-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-5 | 0-2 | 12-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 3-3 | 3-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 747 (career-high), Emil reached the quarter after defeating Ajeet Rai 6-2 6-1, Hayden Jones 6-4 6-2, Philip Sekulic 6-3 6-3 and Leo Vithoontien 6-2 7-6(1).
In the 2nd round, Carl had a good straight sets win against Vithoontien (6-2 7-61). During the match Emil scored 74 points vs Vithoontien’s 46. Carl was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Emil bagged 6 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Carl Emil Overbeck was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 69% (9/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Dane broke Vithoontien 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Carl started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 61% of the points he played.
The Dane’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Alkmaar and M25 Brisbane.
Emil has an overall 25-12 win-loss record in 2025, 13-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wu | Emil |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 86 | 72 |
| Pts | 305-265 | 257-167 |
| Total Points | 570 | 424 |
| Winners | 140 | 100 |
| %Winners | 46% | 39% |
Both Wu and Emil played 4 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Tung-Lin Wu dropped 1 set while Carl Emil Overbeck hasn’t conceded a set so far. Wu has played 1 set more than Emil (9 vs 8). Therefore, Wu played 14 games more than Emil. The Chinese scored 140 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Dane scored 100 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wu | Emil |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 4.8 | 6.8 |
| 1st in | 191/263 | 123/193 |
| %1st in | 73% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 140/191 | 100/123 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 35/72 | 41/70 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 59% |
Wu fired 19 aces (4.8 per match). Emil scored 27 aces (6.8 per match). Wu won 73% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Emil won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wu | Emil |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 16 |
| Converted | 14/42 | 16/38 |
| % Converted | 33% | 42% |
| Conceded | 14 | 7 |
| Saved | 9 | 3 |
| % Saved | 64% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
Wu broke his opponents 14 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Chinese lost his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. The Dane broke his opponents 16 times with a 42% conversion rate. Emil conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wu | ||||||
| Q1 Brownrigg | Q3 Ogura | R1 Langmo | R2 Hewitt | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-65 6-4 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 23 | 28 | 86 | |
| pts | 68-51 | 69-56 | 81-73 | 87-85 | 305-265 | |
| Total points | 119 | 125 | 154 | 172 | 570 | |
| Winners | 32 | 28 | 41 | 39 | 140 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 41% | 51% | 45% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/61 | 39/51 | 54/72 | 55/79 | 191/263 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 76% | 75% | 70% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 28/39 | 41/54 | 39/55 | 140/191 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 72% | 76% | 71% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/18 | 4/12 | 12/18 | 13/24 | 35/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | 67% | 54% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/19 | 1/7 | 3/8 | 14/42 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 26% | 14% | 38% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 1/2 | 1/1 | 2/4 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 68% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | |
| Emil | ||||||
| Q1 Rai | Q3 Jones | R1 Sekulic | R2 Vithoontien | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-2 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 18 | 21 | 72 | |
| pts | 58-33 | 59-38 | 66-50 | 74-46 | 257-167 | |
| Total points | 91 | 97 | 116 | 120 | 424 | |
| Winners | 24 | 21 | 25 | 30 | 100 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% | 38% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 24/41 | 30/52 | 39/52 | 123/193 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 59% | 58% | 75% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 21/24 | 25/30 | 30/39 | 100/123 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 88% | 83% | 77% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 11/17 | 11/22 | 9/13 | 41/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 65% | 50% | 69% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 16 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/10 | 4/8 | 4/11 | 16/38 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 40% | 50% | 36% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 1/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Alex BoltBolt (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Dane SweenySweeny (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction