Charles Broom and Daniel Milavsky will play each other in the 2nd round of the Drummondville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Charles Broom who should win in 3 sets.
Charles Broom -> 1.51
Daniel Milavsky -> 2.35
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Charles Broom vs. Daniel Milavsky
There is no head to head record between Charles Broom and Daniel Milavsky since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Charles Broom
36 - 21win/loss
333
235
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-22 | 34-15 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-33 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 14-13 | 8-7 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 370, the Brit got to the 2nd round after defeating Patrick Zahraj 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Charles had a good straight sets win against Zahraj (6-3 6-2). During the match, Broom scored 61 points vs Zahraj’s 44. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Broom made 2 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Charles Broom lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Broom put 55% of his first serves in, winning 66% (21/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 69% (18/26) on the 2nd serve. Charles broke Zahraj 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Broom has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (252-151). 1-3 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Broom has a composed54-40 match record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
The Brit’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham,M25 Castelo Branco and M25 Sapporo.
Charles has a compiled 35-21 win-loss record in 2025, 1-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Drummondville Challenger
Daniel Milavsky
44 - 21win/loss
369
369
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-21 | 30-14 | 1-1 | 13-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-3 | 3-2 | 2-1 | 7-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 8-4 | 7-4 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 384 (career-high), Milavsky got to the 2nd round after beating Aristotelis Thanos 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Milavsky had a good straight sets win against Thanos (6-3 6-4). During the match Milavsky scored 73 points vs Thanos’s 62. Daniel was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Milavsky scored 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniel Milavsky lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Milavsky put 58% of his first serves in, winning 61% (28/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (18/34) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Thanos 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Daniel’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Kingston,M15 Sherbrooke,Nova and Rivieres.
Daniel has an overall 44-20 win-loss record in 2025, 13-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Drummondville Challenger
Milavsky has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Broom | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 |
| Pts | 61-44 | 73-62 |
| Total Points | 105 | 135 |
| Winners | 21 | 28 |
| %Winners | 34% | 38% |
Both Broom and Milavsky played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Broom and Milavsky have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Broom played 2 games less than Milavsky. Charles scored 21 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 28 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Broom | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 32/58 | 46/80 |
| %1st in | 55% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 28/46 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 18/26 | 18/34 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 53% |
Broom struck 2 aces . Milavsky struck 4 aces . Broom won 66% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Milavsky won 61% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Broom | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 67% | 71% |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Charles lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Milavsky broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Milavsky conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Broom | |||
| R1 Zahraj | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-44 | 61-44 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/58 | 32/58 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 21/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/26 | 18/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Milavsky | |||
| R1 Thanos | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 73-62 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/80 | 46/80 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 28/46 | 28/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/34 | 18/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Drummondville Challenger
- Duncan ChanChan – Karl PolingPoling (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Aristotelis ThanosThanos (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Louis WesselsWessels – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – David PoljakPoljak (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Tristan MccormickMccormick – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Mikael ArseneaultArseneault (3-6 7-65 6-0) – See score progression
- Jangjun KimKim – Taha BaadiBaadi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Cleeve HarperHarper (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Max WiskandtWiskandt (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Nicolas ArseneaultArseneault (3-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Keegan RiceRice – Alex RybakovRybakov (4-6 7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Samir BanerjeeBanerjee (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Clement ChidekhChidekh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Dan MartinMartin – Edward WinterWinter (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Mikael ArseneaultArseneault (3-6 7-6(5) 6-0) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan MartinMartin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Tristan MccormickMccormick (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Louis WesselsWessels (0-0) – H2H and prediction