Jangjun Kim and Daniil Glinka will play each other in the 2^nd round of the Drummondville Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 3:00 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Glinka who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Daniil Glinka is the pick to win this match.
Daniil Glinka -> 1.158
Jangjun Kim -> 4.5

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Jangjun Kim vs. Daniil Glinka

There is no head to head record between Jangjun Kim and Daniil Glinka since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.

Jangjun Kim

Currently unranked, Kim reached the 2^nd round after defeating Trey Hilderbrand 6-1 6-1, Strong Kirchheimer 6-3 6-2 and Taha Baadi 6-3 6-3.

In the 1^st round, The Korean had a good straight sets win against Baadi (6-3 6-3). During the match, Kim scored 77 points vs Baadi’s 61. Jangjun was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.

Regarding the service games, Kim managed to score 3 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Jangjun Kim conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 9 break points. Furthermore, Kim put 69% of his first serves in, winning 67% (30/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the 2nd serve. Jangjun broke Baadi 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).

Kim has a negative win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 44% of his matches (12-15). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kim has an aggregate3-1 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.

Kim has a composed 6-6 win-loss record in 2025, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Drummondville Challenger

Jangjun has never competed in this tournament before.

Daniil Glinka

Ranked no. 247 (career-high), the Estonian reached the 2^nd round after beating Cannon Kingsley 6-4 6-2.

In the 1^st round, Daniil had a good straight sets win against Kingsley (6-4 6-2). During the match Glinka scored 63 points vs Kingsley’s 48. The Estonian was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.

Talking about serving, Glinka managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniil Glinka was quite effective on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Glinka broke Kingsley 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).

The Estonian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Trento,M25 Trimbach,the Cassis Challenger and M25 Nevers.

The Estonian has a compiled 56-23 win-loss record in 2025, 26-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Kim	Glinka
Match played	3	1
Tot Set	6	2
Tot Games	49	18
Pts	202-136	63-48
Total Points	338	111
Winners	87	24
%Winners	43%	38%

Kim played 3 matches while Glinka competed in 1 match. Kim started his run from the qualifications while Glinka had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Kim has played 4 sets more than Glinka (6 vs 2). Therefore, Kim played 31 games more than Glinka. The Korean scored 87 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Daniil made 24 winners (38%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Kim	Glinka
Aces	11	7
Avg per match	3.7	7
1st in	119/162	31/61
%1st in	73%	51%
1st pts	87/119	24/31
%1st pts	73%	77%
2nd pts	29/43	19/30
%2nd pts	67%	63%

Kim recorded 11 aces (3.7 per match). Glinka blasted 7 aces . Kim won 73% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Kim	Glinka
Won	11	3
Converted	11/25	3/6
% Converted	44%	50%
Conceded	15	6
Saved	15	6
% Saved	100%	100%
Times Broken	0	0

Jangjun broke his opponents 11 times with a 44% conversion rate. Jangjun quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 15 break points. The Estonian broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Estonian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 6 break points.

Kim
	Q1 Hilderbrand	Q3 Kirchheimer	R1 Baadi	Total
Score	6-1 6-1	6-3 6-2	6-3 6-3
Tot Set	2	2	2	6
Tot Games	14	17	18	49
pts	63-34	62-41	77-61	202-136
Total points	97	103	138	338
Winners	25	32	30	87
%Winners	40%	52%	39%	43%
SERVE
Aces	2	6	3	11
Double Faults	1	3	0	4
1st in	32/44	42/53	45/65	119/162
% 1st in	73%	79%	69%	73%
1st pts	25/32	32/42	30/45	87/119
% 1st pts	78%	76%	67%	73%
2nd pts	7/12	8/11	14/20	29/43
% 2nd pts	58%	73%	70%	67%
Breaks
Won	5	3	3	11
Converted	5/10	3/6	3/9	11/25
Converted %	50%	50%	33%	44%
Conceded	3	3	9	15
Saved	3/3	3/3	9/9	15
Saved %	100%	100%	100%	100%
Times Broken	0	0	0	0

Glinka
	R1 Kingsley	Total
Score	6-4 6-2
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	18	18
pts	63-48	63-48
Total points	111	111
Winners	24	24
%Winners	38%	38%
SERVE
Aces	7	7
Double Faults	3	3
1st in	31/61	31/61
% 1st in	51%	51%
1st pts	24/31	24/31
% 1st pts	77%	77%
2nd pts	19/30	19/30
% 2nd pts	63%	63%
Breaks
Won	3	3
Converted	3/6	3/6
Converted %	50%	50%
Conceded	6	6
Saved	6/6	6
Saved %	100%	33%
Times Broken	0	0

Tennis Scores in Drummondville Challenger

• Louis WesselsWessels – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
• Tristan MccormickMccormick – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
• Duncan ChanChan – Karl PolingPoling (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Michael MmohMmoh – Cleeve HarperHarper (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Aristotelis ThanosThanos (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Jangjun KimKim – Taha BaadiBaadi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – David PoljakPoljak (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
• Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Max WiskandtWiskandt (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
• Liam DraxlDraxl – Mikael ArseneaultArseneault (3-6 7-6⁵ 6-0) – See score progression
• Charles BroomBroom – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
• Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Samir BanerjeeBanerjee (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Keegan RiceRice – Alex RybakovRybakov (4-6 7-6⁵ 6-3) – See score progression
• Dan MartinMartin – Edward WinterWinter (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Clement ChidekhChidekh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
• Andre IlaganIlagan – Nicolas ArseneaultArseneault (3-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
• Liam DraxlDraxl – Mikael ArseneaultArseneault (3-6 7-6(5) 6-0) – See score progression
• James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – David PoljakPoljak (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
• Louis WesselsWessels – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
• Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Aristotelis ThanosThanos (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Charles BroomBroom – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-3 6-2) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Dan MartinMartin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Liam DraxlDraxl – Tristan MccormickMccormick (2-1) – H2H and prediction
• Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Louis WesselsWessels (0-0) – H2H and prediction