Keegan Rice and Dan Martin will clash against each other in the 2^nd round of the Drummondville Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 6:30 pm on COURT CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dan Martin who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Dan Martin is the pick to win this match.
Dan Martin -> 1.69
Keegan Rice -> 2.02

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Keegan Rice vs. Dan Martin

There is no head to head record between Keegan Rice and Dan Martin since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.

Keegan Rice

Currently unranked, Keegan reached the 2^nd round after beating Alex Rybakov 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.

In the 1^st round against Rybakov, The Canadian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-6⁵ 6-3). During the match, Rice scored 109 points vs Rybakov’s 106. Keegan was extremely aggressive to blast 50 winners.

Talking about the service games, Rice made 5 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Keegan Rice lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Rice put 68% of his first serves in, winning 69% (50/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (18/34) on the 2nd serve. Keegan broke Rybakov 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).

Rice has won exactly 50% of his matches (15-15) in the last 3 years. 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Rice has an aggregate1-2 win-loss record in the last 3 years on indoor hard courts.

The Canadian has an aggregate 14-7 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Drummondville Challenger

Rice has never competed in this tournament before.

Dan Martin

Ranked no. 449, the Canadian got to the 2^nd round after defeating Edward Winter 6-3 6-3.

In the 1^st round, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Winter (6-3 6-3). During the match Martin scored 61 points vs Winter’s 47. Martin was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.

Talking about serving, Martin blasted 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Dan Martin was quite effective on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Martin broke Winter 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).

Martin’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Villahermosa.

Martin has an aggregate 32-30 win-loss record in 2025, 11-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Drummondville Challenger

Previously, his best result was reaching the 2^nd round in 2023. See his history.

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Rice	Martin
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	3	2
Tot Games	32	18
Pts	109-106	61-47
Total Points	215	108
Winners	50	27
%Winners	46%	44%

Both Rice and Martin played 1 match. At the moment, Keegan Rice conceded 1 set while Dan Martin hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Rice has played 1 set more than Martin (3 vs 2). Therefore, Rice played 14 games more than Martin. The Canadian scored 50 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Dan bagged 27 winners (44%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Rice	Martin
Aces	5	4
Avg per match	5	4
1st in	72/106	35/52
%1st in	68%	67%
1st pts	50/72	27/35
%1st pts	69%	77%
2nd pts	18/34	10/17
%2nd pts	53%	59%

Rice bagged 5 aces . Martin struck 4 aces . Rice won 69% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Martin won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Rice	Martin
Won	4	3
Converted	4/12	3/5
% Converted	33%	60%
Conceded	7	0
Saved	4	0
% Saved	57%	0%
Times Broken	3	0

Keegan broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Keegan lost his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Dan broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Dan was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.

Rice
	R1 Rybakov	Total
Score	4-6 7-65 6-3
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	32	32
pts	109-106	109-106
Total points	215	215
Winners	50	50
%Winners	46%	46%
SERVE
Aces	5	5
Double Faults	7	7
1st in	72/106	72/106
% 1st in	68%	68%
1st pts	50/72	50/72
% 1st pts	69%	69%
2nd pts	18/34	18/34
% 2nd pts	53%	53%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/12	4/12
Converted %	33%	33%
Conceded	7	7
Saved	4/7	4
Saved %	57%	57%
Times Broken	3	3

Martin
	R1 Winter	Total
Score	6-3 6-3
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	18	18
pts	61-47	61-47
Total points	108	108
Winners	27	27
%Winners	44%	44%
SERVE
Aces	4	4
Double Faults	2	2
1st in	35/52	35/52
% 1st in	67%	67%
1st pts	27/35	27/35
% 1st pts	77%	77%
2nd pts	10/17	10/17
% 2nd pts	59%	59%
Breaks
Won	3	3
Converted	3/5	3/5
Converted %	60%	60%
Conceded	0	0
Saved	0/0	0
Saved %	–	0%
Times Broken	0	0

Tennis Scores in Drummondville Challenger

• Liam DraxlDraxl – Mikael ArseneaultArseneault (3-6 7-6(5) 6-0) – See score progression
• Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Aristotelis ThanosThanos (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Tristan MccormickMccormick – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
• Jangjun KimKim – Taha BaadiBaadi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Max WiskandtWiskandt (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
• Duncan ChanChan – Karl PolingPoling (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Louis WesselsWessels – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
• Michael MmohMmoh – Cleeve HarperHarper (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
• Charles BroomBroom – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
• James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – David PoljakPoljak (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
• Andre IlaganIlagan – Nicolas ArseneaultArseneault (3-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
• Dan MartinMartin – Edward WinterWinter (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• Keegan RiceRice – Alex RybakovRybakov (4-6 7-6⁵ 6-3) – See score progression
• Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Clement ChidekhChidekh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
• Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Samir BanerjeeBanerjee (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Liam DraxlDraxl – Mikael ArseneaultArseneault (3-6 7-6(5) 6-0) – See score progression
• Tristan MccormickMccormick – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
• Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Max WiskandtWiskandt (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
• Michael MmohMmoh – Cleeve HarperHarper (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• Jangjun KimKim – Taha BaadiBaadi (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
• James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – David PoljakPoljak (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
• Louis WesselsWessels – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
• Daniel MilavskyMilavsky – Aristotelis ThanosThanos (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Charles BroomBroom – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-3 6-2) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Dan MartinMartin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Liam DraxlDraxl – Tristan MccormickMccormick (2-1) – H2H and prediction
• Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Louis WesselsWessels (0-0) – H2H and prediction