Taym Al Azmeh and Andres Martin will square off in the 2nd round of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 5:00 pm on THE SCHWARTZ COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andres Martin who should win in 2 sets.
Andres Martin -> 1.23
Taym Al Azmeh -> 3.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Taym Al Azmeh vs. Andres Martin
There is no head to head record between Taym Al Azmeh and Andres Martin since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Taym Al Azmeh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17-12 | 2-3 | 10-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 7-9 | 1-5 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-21 | 6-5 | 18-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 7-10 | 7-4 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Al Azmeh reached the 2nd round after defeating Peter Bertran 6-1 6-4, Maik Steiner 7-5 6-4 and Sasha Colleu 6-2 6-7(5) 6-1.
In the 1st round, Taym defeated Colleu (6-2 6-75 6-1). During the match, Al Azmeh scored 103 points vs Colleu’s 83. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about the service games, Al Azmeh made 4 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Taym Al Azmeh lost the serve twice and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Al Azmeh put 72% of his first serves in, winning 68% (50/73) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Colleu 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Al Azmeh has won exactly 50% of his matches (58-57) in the last 6 years. 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Al Azmeh has an aggregate4-2 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The German has a composed 16-11 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Al Azmeh has never competed in this tournament before.
Andres Martin
47 - 28win/loss
264
264
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-28 | 32-18 | 9-4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-16 | 14-11 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-17 | 14-11 | 1-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-8 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 268 (career-high), Martin got to the 2nd round after beating Ryan Fishback 6-3 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, Martin had a good straight sets win against Fishback (6-3 7-64). During the match Martin scored 79 points vs Fishback’s 67. Martin was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Martin scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Andres Martin lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Martin put 67% of his first serves in, winning 60% (32/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (11/26) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Fishback 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Kingston,M25 Calabasas and the Bloomfield Hills Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 47-27 win-loss record in 2025, 6-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Al Azmeh | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 67 | 22 |
| Pts | 255-209 | 79-67 |
| Total Points | 464 | 146 |
| Winners | 122 | 32 |
| %Winners | 48% | 41% |
Al Azmeh played 3 matches while Martin competed in 1 match. Al Azmeh started his run from the qualifications while Martin had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Taym Al Azmeh dropped 1 set while Andres Martin hasn’t dropped a set so far. Al Azmeh has played 5 sets more than Martin (7 vs 2). Therefore, Al Azmeh played 45 games more than Martin. Al Azmeh scored 122 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Martin fired 32 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Al Azmeh | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 5.3 | 1 |
| 1st in | 165/245 | 53/79 |
| %1st in | 67% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 122/165 | 32/53 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 35/80 | 11/26 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 42% |
Al Azmeh recorded 16 aces (5.3 per match). Martin blasted 1 ace . Al Azmeh won 74% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Martin won 60% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Al Azmeh | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 5 |
| Converted | 14/26 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 54% | 56% |
| Conceded | 21 | 11 |
| Saved | 17 | 7 |
| % Saved | 81% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
The German broke his opponents 14 times with a 54% conversion rate. The German surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Al Azmeh | |||||
| Q1 Bertran | Q3 Steiner | R1 Colleu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 7-5 6-4 | 6-2 6-75 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 22 | 28 | 67 | |
| pts | 75-57 | 77-69 | 103-83 | 255-209 | |
| Total points | 132 | 146 | 186 | 464 | |
| Winners | 30 | 42 | 50 | 122 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 55% | 49% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 7 | 4 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 10 | 6 | 21 | |
| 1st in | 38/64 | 54/79 | 73/102 | 165/245 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 68% | 72% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 30/38 | 42/54 | 50/73 | 122/165 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 78% | 68% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/26 | 10/25 | 15/29 | 35/80 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 40% | 52% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 6 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 3/7 | 6/8 | 14/26 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 43% | 75% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 12 | 21 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 5/6 | 10/12 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 83% | 83% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
| Martin | |||||
| R1 Fishback | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |||
| pts | 79-67 | 79-67 | |||
| Total points | 146 | 146 | |||
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |||
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |||
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |||
| 1st in | 53/79 | 53/79 | |||
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |||
| 1st pts | 32/53 | 32/53 | |||
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |||
| 2nd pts | 11/26 | 11/26 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |||
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |||
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |||
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |||
| Saved | 7/11 | 7 | |||
| Saved % | 64% | 21% | |||
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |||
Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Aidan MchughMchugh (1-6 7-6(0) 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Aidan MchughMchugh (1-6 7-6(0) 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend (7-66 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex MartinezMartinez – Adam JillyJilly (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Adhithya GanesanGanesan (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Alex MartinezMartinez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Tyler ZinkZink (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – (1-0) – H2H and prediction