Leo Vithoontien and Carl Emil Overbeck will play each other in the 2nd round of the Brisbane 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 10. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Carl Emil Overbeck who should win in 2 sets.
Carl Emil Overbeck -> 1.2
Leo Vithoontien -> 3.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Leo Vithoontien vs. Carl Emil Overbeck
There is no head to head record between Leo Vithoontien and Carl Emil Overbeck since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Leo Vithoontien
25 - 28win/loss
691
691
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-30 | 22-23 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-33 | 21-23 | 7-4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-25 | 24-16 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-11 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 746, Leo got to the 2nd round after beating Duje Markovina 6-3 7-6(6), Takuya Kumasaka 6-4 3-6 6-2 and Jason Murray Kubler 6-3 3-6 6-3
.In the 1st round, The Japanese defeated Murray Kubler (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match, Vithoontien scored 89 points vs Murray Kubler’s 85. The Japanese was extremely aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about the service games, Vithoontien fired 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Leo Vithoontien lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Vithoontien put 77% of his first serves in, winning 68% (50/73) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Murray Kubler twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Vithoontien has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 51% of his matches (103-97). 21-21 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Vithoontien has a composed79-68 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
Leo’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 San Diego.
Vithoontien has an overall 25-28 win-loss record in 2025, 21-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 3 Challenger
The Japanese has never competed in this tournament before.
Carl Emil Overbeck
24 - 12win/loss
649
649
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-13 | 16-3 | 9-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-5 | 0-2 | 12-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 3-3 | 3-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 747 (career-high), Carl reached the 2nd round after beating Ajeet Rai 6-2 6-1, Hayden Jones 6-4 6-2 and Philip Sekulic 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Emil had a good straight sets win against Sekulic (6-3 6-3). During the match Emil scored 66 points vs Sekulic’s 50. Emil was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Emil fired 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Carl Emil Overbeck lost the serve once. Furthermore, Emil put 58% of his first serves in, winning 83% (25/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. The Dane broke Sekulic 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Carl’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Alkmaar and M25 Brisbane.
Emil has an aggregate 24-12 win-loss record in 2025, 12-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vithoontien | Emil |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 76 | 51 |
| Pts | 262-237 | 183-121 |
| Total Points | 499 | 304 |
| Winners | 126 | 70 |
| %Winners | 48% | 38% |
Both Vithoontien and Emil played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Leo Vithoontien lost 2 sets while Carl Emil Overbeck hasn’t dropped a set so far. Vithoontien has played 2 sets more than Emil (8 vs 6). Therefore, Vithoontien played 25 games more than Emil. The Japanese scored 126 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Carl fired 70 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vithoontien | Emil |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 22 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 7.3 | 7 |
| 1st in | 182/249 | 84/141 |
| %1st in | 73% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 126/182 | 70/84 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 35/67 | 32/57 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 56% |
Vithoontien made 22 aces (7.3 per match). Emil managed to score 21 aces (7 per match). Vithoontien won 69% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Emil won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vithoontien | Emil |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 12 |
| Converted | 10/26 | 12/27 |
| % Converted | 38% | 44% |
| Conceded | 19 | 4 |
| Saved | 12 | 2 |
| % Saved | 63% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 2 |
Leo broke his opponents 10 times with a 38% conversion rate. Vithoontien lost his serve 7 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Carl broke his opponents 12 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Dane conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vithoontien | |||||
| Q1 Markovina | Q3 Kumasaka | R1 Murray Kubler | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-66 | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 27 | 27 | 76 | |
| pts | 81-68 | 92-84 | 89-85 | 262-237 | |
| Total points | 149 | 176 | 174 | 499 | |
| Winners | 36 | 40 | 50 | 126 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 43% | 56% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 5 | 8 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 49/67 | 60/87 | 73/95 | 182/249 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 69% | 77% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 36/49 | 40/60 | 50/73 | 126/182 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 67% | 68% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/18 | 7/27 | 13/22 | 35/67 | |
| % 2nd pts | 83% | 26% | 59% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 7 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 1/6 | 7/17 | 2/3 | 10/26 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 41% | 67% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 | 8 | 19 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 2/8 | 7/8 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 25% | 88% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
| Emil | |||||
| Q1 Rai | Q3 Jones | R1 Sekulic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 18 | 51 | |
| pts | 58-33 | 59-38 | 66-50 | 183-121 | |
| Total points | 91 | 97 | 116 | 304 | |
| Winners | 24 | 21 | 25 | 70 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 8 | 7 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 24/41 | 30/52 | 84/141 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 59% | 58% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 21/24 | 25/30 | 70/84 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 88% | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 11/17 | 11/22 | 32/57 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 65% | 50% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/10 | 4/8 | 12/27 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 40% | 50% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 0% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Brisbane 3 Challenger
- Bernard TomicTomic – Marek GengelGengel (7-5 3-6 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – Mees RottgeringRottgering (6-72 6-3 3-2 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dane SweenySweeny – Tai SachSach (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Emile HuddHudd (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Blake EllisEllis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Dane SweenySweeny (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alex BoltBolt (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction