Tung-Lin Wu and Cruz Hewitt will play each other in the 2nd round of the Brisbane 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:00 pm on PAT RAFTER ARENA. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 2 sets.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.29
Cruz Hewitt -> 3.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tung-Lin Wu vs. Cruz Hewitt
There is no head to head record between Tung-Lin Wu and Cruz Hewitt since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Tung-Lin Wu
19 - 24win/loss
390
158
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-25 | 19-17 | 3-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-43 | 32-40 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 21-21 | 4-5 | 3-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-24 | 26-14 | 6-3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-26 | 10-10 | 2-8 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 518, Tung-Lin got to the 2nd round after defeating Noah Brownrigg 6-3 6-3, Kosuke Ogura 6-3 6-2 and Christian Langmo 7-6(5) 6-4.
In the 1st round, Wu had a good straight sets win against Langmo (7-65 6-4). During the match, Wu scored 81 points vs Langmo’s 73. Wu was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wu scored 5 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Tung-Lin Wu was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (41/54) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Chinese broke Langmo once after converting 14% of his break points (1/7).
Wu has good match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (265-238). 16-16 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wu has a compiled 202-167 record in the last years on hard.
Wu has a composed 19-24 win-loss record in 2025, 16-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 3 Challenger
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
Cruz Hewitt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-16 | 16-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 4-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-4 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 818, the Australian got to the 2nd round after beating James McCabe 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Cruz had a good straight sets win against McCabe (6-2 6-1). During the match Hewitt scored 62 points vs McCabe’s 37. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Hewitt blasted 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Cruz Hewitt was very effective on serve to win 79% (26/33) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Hewitt broke McCabe 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The Australian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Launceston.
Hewitt has an aggregate 16-15 win-loss record in 2025, 16-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wu | Hewitt |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 58 | 15 |
| Pts | 218-180 | 62-37 |
| Total Points | 398 | 99 |
| Winners | 101 | 26 |
| %Winners | 46% | 42% |
Wu played 3 matches while Hewitt competed in 1 match. Wu started his run from the qualifications while Hewitt had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Wu has played 4 sets more than Hewitt (6 vs 2). Therefore, Wu played 43 games more than Hewitt. Wu scored 101 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Hewitt bagged 26 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wu | Hewitt |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 136/184 | 33/48 |
| %1st in | 74% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 101/136 | 26/33 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 22/48 | 9/15 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 60% |
Wu fired 15 aces (5 per match). Hewitt scored 5 aces . Wu won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Hewitt won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wu | Hewitt |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 4 |
| Converted | 11/34 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 32% | 44% |
| Conceded | 10 | 1 |
| Saved | 7 | 1 |
| % Saved | 70% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The Chinese broke his opponents 11 times with a 32% conversion rate. Tung-Lin surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. Cruz broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Cruz was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Wu | |||||
| Q1 Brownrigg | Q3 Ogura | R1 Langmo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 23 | 58 | |
| pts | 68-51 | 69-56 | 81-73 | 218-180 | |
| Total points | 119 | 125 | 154 | 398 | |
| Winners | 32 | 28 | 41 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 41% | 51% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 43/61 | 39/51 | 54/72 | 136/184 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 76% | 75% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 28/39 | 41/54 | 101/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 72% | 76% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/18 | 4/12 | 12/18 | 22/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | 67% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 1 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/19 | 1/7 | 11/34 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 26% | 14% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 1/2 | 1/1 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 50% | 100% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| Hewitt | |||||
| R1 McCabe | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |||
| pts | 62-37 | 62-37 | |||
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |||
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |||
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |||
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |||
| 1st in | 33/48 | 33/48 | |||
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |||
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 26/33 | |||
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |||
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |||
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |||
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |||
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |||
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |||
| Saved % | 100% | 33% | |||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |||
Tennis Scores in Brisbane 3 Challenger
- Bernard TomicTomic – Marek GengelGengel (7-5 3-6 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – Mees RottgeringRottgering (6-72 6-3 3-2 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dane SweenySweeny – Tai SachSach (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Emile HuddHudd (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Blake EllisEllis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Dane SweenySweeny (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alex BoltBolt (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction