Tyler Zink and Shunsuke Mitsui will square off in the 1st round of the Champaign Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 10:00 am on THE SCHWARTZ COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Shunsuke Mitsui who should win in 3 sets.
Shunsuke Mitsui -> 1.61
Tyler Zink -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tyler Zink vs. Shunsuke Mitsui
This will be the 3rd time that Tyler Zink and Shunsuke Mitsui clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Zink won 7-6(5) 6-1 in the 1st round in the Champaign Challenger back in November 2025.
Tyler Zink
37 - 30win/loss
293
278
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-31 | 13-14 | 15-9 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-12 | 13-7 | 9-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 11-11 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-9 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 298, Tyler reached the 1st round after beating Shunsuke Mitsui 7-6(5) 6-1.
In the 1st round, Tyler had a good straight sets win against Mitsui (7-65 6-1). During the match, Zink scored 73 points vs Mitsui’s 65. Zink was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zink bagged 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tyler Zink lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Zink put 61% of his first serves in, winning 64% (27/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the 2nd serve. Tyler broke Mitsui 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Zink has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 55% of his matches (101-82). 8-6 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zink has an aggregate19-14 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Tyler’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Orange Park and the Tiburon Challenger.
Zink has an overall 37-30 win-loss record in 2025, 8-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Shunsuke Mitsui
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-10 | 23-8 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-10 | 11-7 | 2-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-7 | 17-7 | 0-0 | 4-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-5 | 1-3 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 624 (career-high), Mitsui got to the 1st round after defeating Benedict Graft 6-2 6-0, Ryan Seggerman 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4
and Tyler Zink 7-6(5) 6-1.The Japanese’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Luan,Salem and M15 Lexington.
Mitsui has a composed 29-10 win-loss record in 2025, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Mitsui has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zink | Mitsui |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 46 |
| Pts | 73-65 | 166-114 |
| Total Points | 138 | 280 |
| Winners | 27 | 63 |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% |
Zink played 1 match while Mitsui competed in 2 matches. Mitsui started his run from the qualifications while Zink had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Shunsuke Mitsui dropped 1 set while Tyler Zink hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Zink has played 3 set(s) less than Mitsui (2 vs 5). Therefore, Zink played 26 games less than Mitsui. Zink scored 27 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Mitsui managed to score 63 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zink | Mitsui |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
| 1st in | 42/69 | 82/128 |
| %1st in | 61% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 27/42 | 63/82 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 36/46 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 78% |
Zink managed to score 3 aces . Mitsui scored 2 aces (1 per match). Zink won 64% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Mitsui won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 78% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zink | Mitsui |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 8 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 8/12 |
| % Converted | 42% | 67% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Tyler broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Mitsui broke his opponents 8 times with a 67% conversion rate. Mitsui conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zink | |||
| R1 Mitsui | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 73-65 | 73-65 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/69 | 42/69 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 27/42 | 27/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 14/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Mitsui | |||||
| Q1 Graft | Q3 Seggerman | R1 Zink | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | 6-74 6-3 6-4 | 7-65 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 32 | 20 | 66 | |
| pts | 52-22 | 114-92 | – | 166-114 | |
| Total points | 74 | 206 | 0 | 280 | |
| Winners | 18 | 45 | 63 | ||
| %Winners | 35% | 39% | 0% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | 21/35 | 61/93 | / | 82/128 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 66% | 0% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 18/21 | 45/61 | / | 63/82 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 74% | 0% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 26/32 | / | 36/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 81% | 0% | 78% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | ||
| Converted | 5/6 | 3/6 | / | 8/12 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 50% | 0% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 4 | ||
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/4 | 0/ | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | – | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Johannus MondayMonday (7-68 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tyler ZinkZink – Shunsuke MitsuiMitsui (7-65 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Leo BorgBorg (6-1 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adam JillyJilly – Keegan SmithSmith (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex MartinezMartinez – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (7-5 3-6 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Hoyoung RohRoh (6-0 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adhithya GanesanGanesan – Oliver OkonkwoOkonkwo (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – Alfredo PerezPerez (6-4 5-7 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Tyler ZinkZink (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction