Hayato Matsuoka and Emile Hudd will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Brisbane 3 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 10. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hayato Matsuoka who should win in 3 sets.
Hayato Matsuoka -> 1.54
Emile Hudd -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Hayato Matsuoka vs. Emile Hudd
This will be the 2nd time that Hayato Matsuoka and Emile Hudd face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Hudd (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Hudd won 3-6 6-4 6-2 in the qualifications in the Playford Challenger back in 2024.
Hayato Matsuoka
30 - 27win/loss
483
483
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-28 | 27-21 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-26 | 26-15 | 13-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-13 | 10-9 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 589 (career-high), Hayato got to the 2nd round after beating Matthew Hulme 6-4 6-4, Scott Jones 7-6(1) 7-5 and Rinky Hijikata 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Hayato had a good straight sets win against Hijikata (6-4 6-2). During the match, Matsuoka scored 65 points vs Hijikata’s 55. Matsuoka was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Matsuoka recorded 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Hayato Matsuoka lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Matsuoka put 71% of his first serves in, winning 72% (28/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (8/16) on the 2nd serve. Hayato broke Hijikata 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Matsuoka has a winning record in the last 4 years having won 55% of his matches (87-70). 23-20 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Matsuoka has a compiled59-45 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
Hayato’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Torello,M25 Les Franqueses del Valles and M25 Huzhou.
Hayato has an aggregate 30-27 win-loss record in 2025, 23-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 3 Challenger
Emile Hudd
13 - 14win/loss
747
520
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-15 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2024 | 40-28 | 31-23 | 6-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-17 | 21-12 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 8-4 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 840, Hudd reached the 2nd round after beating Finn Bass 6-3 6-2, Taiyo Yamanaka 6-2 6-3 and Matthew Dellavedova 6-1 2-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Emile defeated Dellavedova (6-1 2-6 6-2). During the match Hudd scored 72 points vs Dellavedova’s 57. Hudd was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Hudd bagged 14 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Emile Hudd was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (32/44) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Hudd broke Dellavedova 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Hudd’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Lannion and M25 Perth.
Hudd has an aggregate 13-14 win-loss record in 2025, 10-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Matsuoka | Hudd |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 63 | 57 |
| Pts | 209-181 | 187-142 |
| Total Points | 390 | 329 |
| Winners | 102 | 81 |
| %Winners | 49% | 43% |
Both Matsuoka and Hudd played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Emile Hudd conceded 1 set while Hayato Matsuoka hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Matsuoka has played 1 set(s) less than Hudd (6 vs 7). However, it’s interesting to notice that Matsuoka played 6 games more than Hudd. The Japanese scored 102 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit fired 81 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Matsuoka | Hudd |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 35 |
| Avg per match | 3.7 | 11.7 |
| 1st in | 132/192 | 112/175 |
| %1st in | 69% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 102/132 | 81/112 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 32/60 | 40/63 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 63% |
Matsuoka made 11 aces (3.7 per match). Hudd bagged 35 aces (11.7 per match). Matsuoka won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Hudd won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Matsuoka | Hudd |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 11 |
| Converted | 7/21 | 11/15 |
| % Converted | 33% | 73% |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 |
| Saved | 6 | 6 |
| % Saved | 86% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Japanese broke his opponents 7 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 11 times with a 73% conversion rate. Hudd conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Matsuoka | |||||
| Q1 Hulme | Q3 Jones | R1 Hijikata | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-61 7-5 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 25 | 18 | 63 | |
| pts | 64-53 | 80-73 | 65-55 | 209-181 | |
| Total points | 117 | 153 | 120 | 390 | |
| Winners | 33 | 41 | 28 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 51% | 43% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 7 | 2 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 41/57 | 52/80 | 39/55 | 132/192 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 65% | 71% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 41/52 | 28/39 | 102/132 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 79% | 72% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 15/28 | 8/16 | 32/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 54% | 50% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 1/7 | 4/11 | 7/21 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 14% | 36% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 1/1 | 3/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 75% | 92% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Hudd | |||||
| Q1 Bass | Q3 Yamanaka | R1 Dellavedova | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 23 | 57 | |
| pts | 56-45 | 59-40 | 72-57 | 187-142 | |
| Total points | 101 | 99 | 129 | 329 | |
| Winners | 26 | 23 | 32 | 81 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 39% | 44% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 10 | 14 | 35 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 34/54 | 44/64 | 112/175 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 63% | 69% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 23/34 | 32/44 | 81/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 68% | 73% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 13/20 | 13/20 | 40/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 65% | 65% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 4/4 | 4/6 | 11/15 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 100% | 67% | 73% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | 33% | 61% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Brisbane 3 Challenger
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Cruz HewittHewitt – James McCabeMcCabe (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Emile HuddHudd – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (6-1 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Blake EllisEllis – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Mees RottgeringRottgering – Blaise BicknellBicknell (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Christian LangmoLangmo (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Ethan Cook/Tai SachCook/Tai Sach – Rio Noguchi/Naoki TajimaNoguchi/Naoki Tajima (3-6 7-5 10-8) – See score progression
- Leo VithoontienVithoontien – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Aryan ShahShah (1-6 7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Carl Emil OverbeckEmil Overbeck – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Tai SachSach – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marek GengelGengel – Karan SinghSingh (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Li TuTu (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Pavle MarinkovMarinkov (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Omar JasikaJasika (5-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alex BoltBolt (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emile HuddHudd – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tai SachSach – Dane SweenySweeny (0-2) – H2H and prediction