Jake Delaney and Mees Rottgering will square off in the 2nd round of the Brisbane 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 5:30 pm on PAT RAFTER ARENA. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mees Rottgering who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mees Rottgering is the pick to win this match.
Mees Rottgering -> 1.53
Jake Delaney -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jake Delaney vs. Mees Rottgering
There is no head to head record between Jake Delaney and Mees Rottgering since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jake Delaney
46 - 25win/loss
464
434
LLWWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 49-28 | 42-24 | 3-1 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 40-31 | 38-28 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-27 | 34-21 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 8-10 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 504, the Australian reached the 2nd round after beating Rio Noguchi 6-2 7-6(3).
In the 1st round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Noguchi (6-2 7-63). During the match, Delaney scored 72 points vs Noguchi’s 55. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Delaney fired 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jake Delaney was quite efficient on serve to win 84% (31/37) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Noguchi twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Delaney has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 55% of his matches (195-160). 39-21 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Delaney has an aggregate175-138 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Nakhon Pathom.
The Australian has an overall 46-25 win-loss record in 2025, 39-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 3 Challenger
Mees Rottgering
25 - 24win/loss
625
612
LWLWLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-25 | 8-9 | 10-10 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 14-11 | 8-7 | 5-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 10-7 | 7-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 648, the Dutch reached the 2nd round after beating Blaise Bicknell 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, Mees had a good straight sets win against Bicknell (6-3 6-1). During the match Rottgering scored 59 points vs Bicknell’s 40. The Dutch was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Rottgering recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Mees Rottgering was exceptionally effective on serve to win 71% (22/31) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Dutch broke Bicknell 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Mees’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Antalya and M15 Klagenfurt.
Rottgering has a compiled 25-24 win-loss record in 2025, 8-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Delaney | Rottgering |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 16 |
| Pts | 72-55 | 59-40 |
| Total Points | 127 | 99 |
| Winners | 31 | 22 |
| %Winners | 43% | 37% |
Both Delaney and Rottgering played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Delaney and Rottgering have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Delaney played 5 games more than Rottgering. The Australian scored 31 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Mees fired 22 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Delaney | Rottgering |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 2 |
| 1st in | 37/56 | 31/56 |
| %1st in | 66% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | 22/31 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 15/25 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 60% |
Delaney made 12 aces . Rottgering fired 2 aces . Delaney won 84% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Rottgering won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Delaney | Rottgering |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 25% | 80% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Jake broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Delaney very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Rottgering broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Mees was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Delaney | |||
| R1 Noguchi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/56 | 37/56 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | 31/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Rottgering | |||
| R1 Bicknell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-40 | 59-40 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/56 | 31/56 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 22/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWLWW
LWLWLLWLWW Tennis Scores in Brisbane 3 Challenger
- Leo VithoontienVithoontien – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Aryan ShahShah (1-6 7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Carl Emil OverbeckEmil Overbeck – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Cruz HewittHewitt – James McCabeMcCabe (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Emile HuddHudd – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (6-1 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Blake EllisEllis – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Mees RottgeringRottgering – Blaise BicknellBicknell (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Christian LangmoLangmo (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Ethan Cook/Tai SachCook/Tai Sach – Rio Noguchi/Naoki TajimaNoguchi/Naoki Tajima (3-6 7-5 10-8) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Pavle MarinkovMarinkov (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Tai SachSach – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Marek GengelGengel – Karan SinghSingh (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Li TuTu (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Omar JasikaJasika (5-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alex BoltBolt (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emile HuddHudd – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tai SachSach – Dane SweenySweeny (0-2) – H2H and prediction
