Bernard Tomic and Marek Gengel will play each other in the 2nd round of the Brisbane 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on PAT RAFTER ARENA. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernard Tomic who should win in 2 sets.
Bernard Tomic -> 1.182
Marek Gengel -> 4.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. Marek Gengel
There is no head to head record between Bernard Tomic and Marek Gengel since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Bernard Tomic
41 - 31win/loss
182
17
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42-32 | 29-22 | 6-7 | 2-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-29 | 34-19 | 12-5 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 186, the Australian reached the 2nd round after beating Li Tu 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Tomic had a good straight sets win against Tu (6-4 7-5). During the match, Tomic scored 82 points vs Tu’s 68. Tomic was pretty aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tomic made 4 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults. Bernard Tomic lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Tomic put 78% of his first serves in, winning 75% (39/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (7/15) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Tu 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Tomic has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (258-205). 28-21 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Tomic has an aggregate 170-113 record in the last years on hard.
Tomic’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Lexington Challenger and the Barranquilla Challenger.
Tomic has an overall 41-31 win-loss record in 2025, 28-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 3 Challenger
Marek Gengel
19 - 28win/loss
323
229
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19-29 | 19-25 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 85-26 | 82-22 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 327, Gengel reached the 2nd round after beating Karan Singh 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Singh (6-2 6-4). During the match Gengel scored 67 points vs Singh’s 54. Marek was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Gengel recorded 11 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Marek Gengel conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Gengel put 69% of his first serves in, winning 85% (34/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (7/18) on the 2nd serve. Marek broke Singh 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
The Czech’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Brisbane 1 Challenger.
Gengel has a composed 19-28 win-loss record in 2025, 19-24 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tomic | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
| Pts | 82-68 | 67-54 |
| Total Points | 150 | 121 |
| Winners | 39 | 34 |
| %Winners | 48% | 51% |
Both Tomic and Gengel played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Tomic and Gengel have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Tomic played 4 games more than Gengel. Bernard scored 39 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Gengel managed to score 34 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tomic | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 11 |
| 1st in | 52/67 | 40/58 |
| %1st in | 78% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 39/52 | 34/40 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 7/18 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 39% |
Tomic fired 4 aces . Gengel managed to score 11 aces . Tomic won 75% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Gengel won 85% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tomic | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 33% | 30% |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Tomic lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Marek broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. The Czech was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Tomic | |||
| R1 Tu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 82-68 | 82-68 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 52/67 | 52/67 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 39/52 | 39/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gengel | |||
| R1 Singh | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-54 | 67-54 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 40/58 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 34/40 | 34/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 7/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Brisbane 3 Challenger
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Aryan ShahShah (1-6 7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Mees RottgeringRottgering – Blaise BicknellBicknell (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Blake EllisEllis – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Christian LangmoLangmo (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Carl Emil OverbeckEmil Overbeck – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Emile HuddHudd – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (6-1 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Cruz HewittHewitt – James McCabeMcCabe (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Tai SachSach – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Li TuTu (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Pavle MarinkovMarinkov (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Marek GengelGengel – Karan SinghSingh (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Blake EllisEllis – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Aryan ShahShah (1-6 7-6(6) 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cruz HewittHewitt – James McCabeMcCabe (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Christian LangmoLangmo (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Carl Emil OverbeckEmil Overbeck – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-2 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Mees RottgeringRottgering – Blaise BicknellBicknell (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Emile HuddHudd – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (6-1 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Hayato MatsuokaMatsuoka – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Omar JasikaJasika (5-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alex BoltBolt (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emile HuddHudd – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tai SachSach – Dane SweenySweeny (0-2) – H2H and prediction