Noah Zamora and Pablo Martinez Gomez will square off in the qualifications of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 3:00 pm on THE GOLDENBERG COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Pablo Martinez Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
Pablo Martinez Gomez -> 1.49
Noah Zamora -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Noah Zamora vs. Pablo Martinez Gomez
There is no head to head record between Noah Zamora and Pablo Martinez Gomez since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Noah Zamora
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14-12 | 10-8 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-7 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Brandon Perez 7-6(2) 6-1.
In the qualifications, Zamora had a good straight sets win against Perez (7-62 6-1). During the match, Zamora scored 79 points vs Perez’s 61. Zamora was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zamora recorded 4 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Noah Zamora lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Zamora put 52% of his first serves in, winning 81% (22/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. Noah broke Perez 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Zamora has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 54% of his matches (29-25). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Zamora has an overall4-2 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Zamora’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Los Angeles.
Zamora has an aggregate 14-11 win-loss record in 2025, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Noah has never competed in this tournament before.
Pablo Martinez Gomez
29 - 9win/loss
688
688
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-10 | 11-4 | 16-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 5-10 | 3-4 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 713, the Spaniard reached the qualifications after beating Mathis Debru 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Spaniard defeated Debru (7-64 2-6 6-4). During the match Martinez scored 111 points vs Debru’s 102. Pablo was quite aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Talking about serving, Martinez struck 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Pablo Martinez Gomez lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Martinez put 67% of his first serves in, winning 80% (47/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. Pablo broke Debru twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
The Spaniard’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Denia and M15 Xativa.
The Spaniard has a compiled 28-9 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zamora | Martinez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 31 |
| Pts | 79-61 | 111-102 |
| Total Points | 140 | 213 |
| Winners | 22 | 47 |
| %Winners | 28% | 42% |
Both Zamora and Martinez played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Pablo Martinez Gomez lost 1 set while Noah Zamora hasn’t conceded a set so far. Zamora has played 1 set(s) less than Martinez (2 vs 3). Therefore, Zamora played 11 games less than Martinez. Zamora scored 22 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Martinez blasted 47 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zamora | Martinez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8 |
| 1st in | 27/52 | 59/88 |
| %1st in | 52% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 47/59 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 13/29 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 45% |
Zamora made 4 aces . Martinez made 8 aces . Zamora won 81% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Martinez won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zamora | Martinez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 2 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 2/10 |
| % Converted | 55% | 20% |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 40% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Zamora broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. The Spaniard broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. Pablo conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zamora | |||
| Q1 Perez | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 79-61 | 79-61 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/52 | 27/52 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Martinez | |||
| Q1 Debru | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 111-102 | 111-102 | |
| Total points | 213 | 213 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 59/88 | 59/88 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 47/59 | 47/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/29 | 13/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob BrummBrumm – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MartinezMartinez – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction