Shunsuke Mitsui and Ryan Seggerman will square off in the qualifications of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on THE SCHWARTZ COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Shunsuke Mitsui who should win in 2 sets.
Shunsuke Mitsui -> 1.28
Ryan Seggerman -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Shunsuke Mitsui vs. Ryan Seggerman
There is no head to head record between Shunsuke Mitsui and Ryan Seggerman since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Shunsuke Mitsui
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-10 | 24-8 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-10 | 11-7 | 2-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-7 | 17-7 | 0-0 | 4-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-5 | 1-3 | 2-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 624 (career-high), Mitsui got to the qualifications after defeating Benedict Graft 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications, Mitsui had a good straight sets win against Graft (6-2 6-0). During the match, Mitsui scored 52 points vs Graft’s 22. Shunsuke was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mitsui wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Shunsuke Mitsui was extremely efficient on serve to win 86% (18/21) of his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mitsui broke Graft 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Mitsui has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 67% of his matches (71-35). 5-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mitsui has an overall15-6 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Japanese’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Luan,Salem and M15 Lexington.
Mitsui has a composed 28-9 win-loss record in 2025, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Mitsui has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Seggerman
7 - 14win/loss
841
348
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7-14 | 3-4 | 2-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-24 | 13-11 | 12-8 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 864, the American got to the qualifications after defeating Ozan Baris 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Baris (7-5 6-2). During the match Seggerman scored 78 points vs Baris’s 64. Seggerman was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Seggerman bagged 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Ryan Seggerman lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Seggerman put 58% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Baris 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Seggerman has a composed 7-13 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mitsui | Seggerman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 20 |
| Pts | 52-22 | 78-64 |
| Total Points | 74 | 142 |
| Winners | 18 | 28 |
| %Winners | 35% | 36% |
Both Mitsui and Seggerman played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mitsui and Seggerman have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mitsui played 6 games less than Seggerman. The Japanese scored 18 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 28 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mitsui | Seggerman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 6 |
| 1st in | 21/35 | 40/69 |
| %1st in | 60% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 18/21 | 28/40 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 15/29 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 52% |
Mitsui didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Seggerman struck 6 aces . Mitsui won 86% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Seggerman won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mitsui | Seggerman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 4/12 |
| % Converted | 83% | 33% |
| Conceded | 0 | 7 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Mitsui broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Mitsui extremely effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Ryan broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Ryan conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mitsui | |||
| Q1 Graft | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 52-22 | 52-22 | |
| Total points | 74 | 74 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 21/35 | 21/35 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 18/21 | 18/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 10/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Seggerman | |||
| Q1 Baris | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 78-64 | 78-64 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/69 | 40/69 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 28/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 15/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob BrummBrumm – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MartinezMartinez – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction