Jacob Brumm and Ryan Fishback will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on THE SCHWARTZ COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Fishback who should win in 3 sets.
Ryan Fishback -> 1.53
Jacob Brumm -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jacob Brumm vs. Ryan Fishback
There is no head to head record between Jacob Brumm and Ryan Fishback since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jacob Brumm
21 - 27win/loss
686
607
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-27 | 15-23 | 5-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-33 | 29-21 | 3-10 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 17-18 | 15-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-16 | 15-11 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-15 | 23-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 687, Brumm got to the qualifications after beating Drew Van Orderlain 7-6(0) 6-4.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Van Orderlain (7-60 6-4). During the match, Brumm scored 79 points vs Van Orderlain’s 69. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Brumm managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jacob Brumm lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Brumm put 60% of his first serves in, winning 75% (36/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Van Orderlain 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Brumm has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 51% of his matches (134-127). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Brumm has an aggregate4-11 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Jacob’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Anning.
Jacob has an aggregate 21-26 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Jacob has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Fishback
21 - 23win/loss
671
671
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-24 | 14-13 | 3-7 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-24 | 16-17 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-6 | 4-3 | 3-2 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 708, Fishback reached the qualifications after defeating Pranav Kumar 6-3 5-7 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American defeated Kumar (6-3 5-7 6-2). During the match Fishback scored 106 points vs Kumar’s 90. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Fishback struck 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Ryan Fishback lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Fishback put 63% of his first serves in, winning 53% (31/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (22/34) on the 2nd serve. Fishback broke Kumar 8 times after converting 62% of his break points (8/13).
Fishback’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Huamantla and M25 Southaven.
Fishback has an overall 20-23 win-loss record in 2025, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brumm | Fishback |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 29 |
| Pts | 79-69 | 106-90 |
| Total Points | 148 | 196 |
| Winners | 36 | 31 |
| %Winners | 46% | 29% |
Both Brumm and Fishback played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ryan Fishback lost 1 set while Jacob Brumm hasn’t conceded a set so far. Brumm has played 1 set(s) less than Fishback (2 vs 3). Therefore, Brumm played 6 games less than Fishback. Jacob scored 36 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Fishback struck 31 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brumm | Fishback |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 48/80 | 58/92 |
| %1st in | 60% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 36/48 | 31/58 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 53% |
| 2nd pts | 15/32 | 22/34 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 65% |
Brumm blasted 7 aces . Fishback recorded 6 aces . Brumm won 75% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Fishback won 53% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brumm | Fishback |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 8 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 8/13 |
| % Converted | 38% | 62% |
| Conceded | 7 | 10 |
| Saved | 5 | 5 |
| % Saved | 71% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Brumm surrendered his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 8 times with a 62% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Brumm | |||
| Q1 Van Orderlain | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-60 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 79-69 | 79-69 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 48/80 | 48/80 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 36/48 | 36/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/32 | 15/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Fishback | |||
| Q1 Kumar | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 106-90 | 106-90 | |
| Total points | 196 | 196 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 58/92 | 58/92 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 31/58 | 31/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 53% | 53% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/34 | 22/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| Converted % | 62% | 62% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob BrummBrumm – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MartinezMartinez – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction