Jeremy Zhang and Quinn Vandecasteele will play each other in the qualifications of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 3:00 pm on THE SCHWARTZ COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Quinn Vandecasteele who should win in 2 sets.
Quinn Vandecasteele -> 1.152
Jeremy Zhang -> 4.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jeremy Zhang vs. Quinn Vandecasteele
There is no head to head record between Jeremy Zhang and Quinn Vandecasteele since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jeremy Zhang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 14-6 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Australian got to the qualifications after beating Enzo Wallart 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Wallart (6-4 6-3). During the match, Zhang scored 70 points vs Wallart’s 54. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zhang fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jeremy Zhang lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Zhang put 72% of his first serves in, winning 67% (28/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Wallart 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Zhang has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 65% of his matches (31-17). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Zhang has a compiled6-3 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Jeremy has an overall 7-3 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Quinn Vandecasteele
33 - 31win/loss
657
555
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-32 | 25-19 | 0-3 | 6-9 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-20 | 13-13 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 667, the American got to the qualifications after beating Alex Kobelt 4-6 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications against Kobelt, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Vandecasteele scored 101 points vs Kobelt’s 83. Quinn was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Vandecasteele recorded 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Quinn Vandecasteele lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Vandecasteele put 57% of his first serves in, winning 70% (35/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (23/37) on the 2nd serve. Vandecasteele broke Kobelt 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Vandecasteele’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Champaign.
Quinn has a compiled 33-30 win-loss record in 2025, 6-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zhang | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 27 |
| Pts | 70-54 | 101-83 |
| Total Points | 124 | 184 |
| Winners | 28 | 35 |
| %Winners | 40% | 35% |
Both Zhang and Vandecasteele played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Quinn Vandecasteele conceded 1 set while Jeremy Zhang hasn’t lost a set so far. Zhang has played 1 set(s) less than Vandecasteele (2 vs 3). Therefore, Zhang played 8 games less than Vandecasteele. Zhang scored 28 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Vandecasteele bagged 35 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zhang | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 42/58 | 50/87 |
| %1st in | 72% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 28/42 | 35/50 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 23/37 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 62% |
Zhang made 2 aces . Vandecasteele made 4 aces . Zhang won 67% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Vandecasteele won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zhang | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/12 |
| % Converted | 56% | 33% |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 60% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Australian dropped his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Quinn conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zhang | |||
| Q1 Wallart | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 70-54 | 70-54 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/58 | 42/58 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 28/42 | 28/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Vandecasteele | |||
| Q1 Kobelt | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 101-83 | 101-83 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 50/87 | 50/87 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 35/50 | 35/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/37 | 23/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob BrummBrumm – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MartinezMartinez – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction