Yusuke Takahashi and Hikaru Shiraishi will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Kobe Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yusuke Takahashi who should win in 3 sets.
Yusuke Takahashi -> 1.6
Hikaru Shiraishi -> 2.16
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Yusuke Takahashi vs. Hikaru Shiraishi
This will be the 2nd time that Yusuke Takahashi and Hikaru Shiraishi face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Shiraishi (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Shiraishi won 1-6 6-2 6-3 in the quarter in M25 Takasaki back in September 2025.
Yusuke Takahashi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-26 | 40-24 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-28 | 25-25 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-31 | 33-28 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-22 | 17-21 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-23 | 18-21 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 427, the Japanese reached the qualifications after defeating Koki Matsuda 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Yusuke had a good straight sets win against Matsuda (6-3 6-2). During the match, Takahashi scored 65 points vs Matsuda’s 46. The Japanese was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Takahashi scored just 1 ace and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults. Overall, Yusuke Takahashi was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Takahashi broke Matsuda 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Takahashi has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (308-240). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Takahashi has a composed 17-18 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Yusuke’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Kashiwa and M15 Osaka.
The Japanese has a composed 43-24 win-loss record in 2025, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kobe Challenger
Hikaru Shiraishi
51 - 24win/loss
441
437
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52-25 | 49-23 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-18 | 21-14 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-22 | 50-21 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-6 | 18-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 437 (career-high), Shiraishi reached the qualifications after defeating Yusuke Kusuhara 6-4 4-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Japanese defeated Kusuhara (6-4 4-6 6-3). During the match Shiraishi scored 100 points vs Kusuhara’s 87. The Japanese was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Shiraishi made 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Hikaru Shiraishi lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Shiraishi put 65% of his first serves in, winning 67% (43/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (21/35) on the 2nd serve. Shiraishi broke Kusuhara 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Shiraishi’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Hinode,M15 Tokyo,M25 Takasaki and M15 Tanagura.
Shiraishi has an overall 51-24 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kobe Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022 and 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Takahashi | Shiraishi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 29 |
| Pts | 65-46 | 100-87 |
| Total Points | 111 | 187 |
| Winners | 24 | 43 |
| %Winners | 37% | 43% |
Both Takahashi and Shiraishi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Hikaru Shiraishi lost 1 set while Yusuke Takahashi hasn’t lost a set so far. Takahashi has played 1 set(s) less than Shiraishi (2 vs 3). Therefore, Takahashi played 12 games less than Shiraishi. Takahashi scored 24 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Hikaru fired 43 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Takahashi | Shiraishi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
| 1st in | 33/48 | 64/99 |
| %1st in | 69% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 43/64 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 21/35 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 60% |
Takahashi managed to score 1 ace . Shiraishi also scored 5 aces . Takahashi won 73% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Shiraishi won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Takahashi | Shiraishi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 4/12 |
| % Converted | 50% | 33% |
| Conceded | 4 | 9 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 75% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Yusuke broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Japanese dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Japanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Shiraishi conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Takahashi | |||
| Q1 Matsuda | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 65-46 | 65-46 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 33/48 | 33/48 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | 24/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Shiraishi | |||
| Q1 Kusuhara | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 100-87 | 100-87 | |
| Total points | 187 | 187 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 64/99 | 64/99 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 43/64 | 43/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/35 | 21/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Hyeon ChungChung – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Max BasingBasing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Hikaru ShiraishiShiraishi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Igor Ribeiro MarcondesRibeiro Marcondes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction