Daniil Glinka and Darwin Blanch will square off in the semifinal of the Knoxville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:30 pm on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Glinka who should win in 3 sets.
Daniil Glinka -> 1.615
Darwin Blanch -> 2.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniil Glinka vs. Darwin Blanch
There is no head to head record between Daniil Glinka and Darwin Blanch since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Daniil Glinka
55 - 23win/loss
191
191
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60-23 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 30-9 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 256 (career-high), the Estonian reached the semifinal after beating Peter Makk 6-2 6-4, Alfredo Perez 6-3 6-4 and Shunsuke Mitsui 7-5 6-3.
In the quarter, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Mitsui (7-5 6-3). During the match, Glinka scored 78 points vs Mitsui’s 62. Glinka was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Glinka fired 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniil Glinka was quite effective on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 72% (18/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Glinka broke Mitsui 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Estonian hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 57% of the points he played.
Glinka has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (231-176). 25-8 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Glinka has an overall75-46 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The Estonian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Trento,M25 Trimbach,the Cassis Challenger and M25 Nevers.
Daniil has an overall 55-22 win-loss record in 2025, 25-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Knoxville Challenger
Daniil has never competed in this tournament before.
Darwin Blanch
38 - 20win/loss
285
285
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 40-22 | 31-14 | 2-3 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-19 | 16-10 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-7 | 0-2 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 7-4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 335 (career-high), the American got to the semifinal after defeating Alexander Kotzen 6-4 6-2, Andres Martin 6-4 6-4 and Jay Clarke 6-3 7-6(5).
In the quarter, Blanch had a good straight sets win against Clarke (6-3 7-65). During the match Blanch scored 80 points vs Clarke’s 62. Blanch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Blanch recorded 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Darwin Blanch was quite efficient on serve to win 94% (29/31) of his 1st serve and 64% (18/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Darwin broke Clarke twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Blanch hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Darwin’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Villena,M25 Martos and M25 Figueira da Foz.
The American has an overall 37-20 win-loss record in 2025, 4-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Glinka | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 58 | 60 |
| Pts | 198-152 | 213-171 |
| Total Points | 350 | 384 |
| Winners | 83 | 94 |
| %Winners | 42% | 44% |
Both Glinka and Blanch played 3 matches. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Glinka and Blanch have played the same amount of sets 6. However, Glinka played 2 games less than Blanch. The Estonian scored 83 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Blanch struck 94 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Glinka | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 5.7 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 99/170 | 111/184 |
| %1st in | 58% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 83/99 | 94/111 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 42/71 | 38/73 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 52% |
Glinka managed to score 17 aces (5.7 per match). Blanch scored 22 aces (7.3 per match). Glinka won 84% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Blanch won 85% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Glinka | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 8 |
| Converted | 8/16 | 8/22 |
| % Converted | 50% | 36% |
| Conceded | 3 | 14 |
| Saved | 3 | 13 |
| % Saved | 100% | 93% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Estonian broke his opponents 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Estonian quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points. Darwin broke his opponents 8 times with a 36% conversion rate. Darwin conceded his serve once and he saved 93% of the break points that he conceded.
| Glinka | |||||
| R1 Makk | R2 Perez | 1/4 Mitsui | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 19 | 21 | 58 | |
| pts | 58-40 | 62-50 | 78-62 | 198-152 | |
| Total points | 98 | 112 | 140 | 350 | |
| Winners | 28 | 33 | 22 | 83 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 53% | 28% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 4 | 4 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 33/55 | 39/63 | 27/52 | 99/170 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 62% | 52% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 33/39 | 22/27 | 83/99 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | 81% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 11/24 | 18/25 | 42/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 46% | 72% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 2/2 | 3/11 | 8/16 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | 27% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | – | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Blanch | |||||
| R1 Kotzen | R2 Martin | 1/4 Clarke | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 | 22 | 60 | |
| pts | 66-52 | 67-57 | 80-62 | 213-171 | |
| Total points | 118 | 124 | 142 | 384 | |
| Winners | 33 | 32 | 29 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 48% | 36% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 6 | 9 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 41/65 | 39/60 | 31/59 | 111/184 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 65% | 53% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 32/39 | 29/31 | 94/111 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 82% | 94% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 9/21 | 18/28 | 38/73 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 43% | 64% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/6 | 2/9 | 8/22 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 50% | 22% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 | 1 | 14 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6/7 | 1/1 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 86% | 100% | 95% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Knoxville Challenger
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Shunsuke MitsuiMitsui (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Murphy CassoneCassone (7-613 6-3) – See score progression
- Patrick Harper/Quinn VandecasteeleHarper/Quinn Vandecasteele – Pranav Kumar/Noah SchachterKumar/Noah Schachter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Murphy CassoneCassone (7-6(13) 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Shunsuke MitsuiMitsui (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-3 7-6(5)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction