James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will face off in the semifinal of the Taipei Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Duckworth who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, James Duckworth is the pick to win this match.
James Duckworth -> 1.84
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.84

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong

This will be the 3rd time that James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Duckworth (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.

The last time that they locked horns, Duckworth won 7-5 7-5 in the final in the Playford Challenger back in 2023.

James Duckworth

James Duckworth

35 - 31win/loss

Hard
15-18
I Hard
9-3
Clay
6-4
Grass
5-6
Rank
106
High
46
WLWWLWWWWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 39-33 18-19 6-4 10-4 5-6 0-0
2024 42-29 23-14 2-3 7-7 10-5 0-0
2023 51-28 43-21 1-3 5-2 2-2 0-0
2022 24-27 20-18 0-2 0-1 4-6 0-0
2021 36-24 15-9 1-2 12-9 8-4 0-0

Ranked no. 113, James got to the semifinal after defeating Taro Daniel 2-6 7-6(2) 6-2, Michael Vrbensky 6-3 6-2 and Kaichi Uchida 6-3 7-6(2).

In the quarter, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Uchida (6-3 7-62). During the match, Duckworth scored 64 points vs Uchida’s 57. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.

Regarding the service games, Duckworth blasted 17 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. James Duckworth was quite efficient on serve to win 89% (34/38) of his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Uchida once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Australian has dropped 1 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.

Duckworth has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (313-209). 9-3 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Duckworth has an overall 39-30 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.

His best result of the year was winning the title the San Luis Potosi Challenger where he beat Max Wiskandt in the final 6-1 6-1.

The Australian has a compiled 35-31 win-loss record in 2025, 9-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Taipei Challenger

Taipei Challenger
Duckworth's Record

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

32 - 29win/loss

Hard
20-18
I Hard
4-1
Clay
2-6
Grass
6-4
Rank
143
High
128
LWWWLWWWWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 32-30 20-18 2-6 4-2 6-4 0-0
2024 41-36 39-26 0-2 2-4 0-4 0-0
2023 53-27 42-19 9-7 2-1 0-0 0-0
2022 24-19 20-12 3-5 1-2 0-0 0-0
2021 11-7 5-4 6-3 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 152, the got to the semifinal after beating Luca Castelnuovo 6-4 4-6 7-5, Tsung-Hao Huang 6-4 6-4 and Maxime Janvier 6-4 6-4.

In the quarter, The had a good straight sets win against Janvier (6-4 6-4). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 56 points vs Janvier’s 48. Chak was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.

About the serving games, Lam Coleman Wong managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong was exceptionally effective on serve to win 92% (23/25) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Chak broke Janvier twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Chak has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.

The’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Seoul Challenger.

Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate 32-29 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Taipei Challenger

Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2024. See his history.

Taipei Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

J.Duckworth
C.Lam Wong
4h:52
4h:52
Time on court​
4h:21
4h:21
1h:15
1h:15
Last match​
1h:03
1h:03
3
3
Match played
3
3
68
68
Games Played​
72
72
7
7
Set played​​
7
7
226
226
Total points​
232
232
75.3
75.3
Avg point​
77.3
77.3
94
94
Winners
102
102
31.3
31.3
Avg Winners​
34
34
42%
42%
Ratio winners
44%
44%
-- Serve --
32
32
Aces
31
31
!
10.7
10.7
Avg Aces
!
10.3
10.3
9
9
Double Faults
5
5
3
3
Avg Double Faults
1.7
1.7
94/117
94/117
1st won total​
102/132
102/132
!
80%
80%
1st won %
!
77%
77%
52/90
52/90
2nd won total​
55/99
55/99
58%
58%
2nd won %
56%
56%
-- Break Points --
8/26
8/26
BP won
8/13
8/13
2.7/8.7
2.7/8.7
Avg BP won
2.7/4.3
2.7/4.3
31%
31%
Won
!
62%
62%
14
14
Conceded
13
13
4.7
4.7
Avg Conceded
4.3
4.3
4
4
Broken
3
3
1.3
1.3
Avg Broken
1
1
10
10
Saved
10
10

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Duckworth Lam Coleman Wong
Match played 3 3
Tot Set 7 7
Tot Games 68 72
Pts 226-196 232-210
Total Points 422 442
Winners 94 102
%Winners 42% 44%

Both Duckworth and Lam Coleman Wong played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. James Duckworth conceded 1 set, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Duckworth and Lam Coleman Wong have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Duckworth played 4 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. James scored 94 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Chak bagged 102 winners (44%).

Serve Performance

Serve Duckworth Lam Coleman Wong
Aces 32 31
Avg per match 10.7 10.3
1st in 117/207 132/231
%1st in 57% 57%
1st pts 94/117 102/132
%1st pts 80% 77%
2nd pts 52/90 55/99
%2nd pts 58% 56%

Duckworth blasted 32 aces (10.7 per match). Lam Coleman Wong blasted 31 aces (10.3 per match). Duckworth won 80% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Duckworth Lam Coleman Wong
Won 8 8
Converted 8/26 8/13
% Converted 31% 62%
Conceded 14 13
Saved 10 10
% Saved 71% 77%
Times Broken 4 3

Duckworth broke his opponents 8 times with a 31% conversion rate. James lost his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Chak broke his opponents 8 times with a 62% conversion rate. Chak conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.

Duckworth
R1
Daniel
R2
Vrbensky
1/4
Uchida
Total
Score 2-6 7-62 6-2 6-3 6-2 6-3 7-62
Tot Set 3 2 2 7
Tot Games 29 17 22 68
pts 91-88 71-51 64-57 226-196
Total points 179 122 121 422
Winners 42 18 34 94
%Winners 46% 25% 53% 42%
SERVE
Aces 12 3 17 32
Double Faults 8 0 1 9
1st in 57/95 22/48 38/64 117/207
% 1st in 60% 46% 59% 57%
1st pts 42/57 18/22 34/38 94/117
% 1st pts 74% 82% 89% 80%
2nd pts 20/38 16/26 16/26 52/90
% 2nd pts 53% 62% 62% 58%
Breaks
Won 3 4 1 8
Converted 3/12 4/12 1/2 8/26
Converted % 25% 33% 50% 31%
Conceded 10 3 1 14
Saved 7/10 2/3 1/1 10
Saved % 70% 67% 100% 79%
Times Broken 3 1 0 4
Lam Coleman Wong
R1
Castelnuovo
R2
Huang
1/4
Janvier
Total
Score 6-4 4-6 7-5 6-4 6-4 6-4 6-4
Tot Set 3 2 2 7
Tot Games 32 20 20 72
pts 105-102 71-60 56-48 232-210
Total points 207 131 104 442
Winners 49 30 23 102
%Winners 47% 42% 41% 44%
SERVE
Aces 15 7 9 31
Double Faults 2 0 3 5
1st in 71/119 36/61 25/51 132/231
% 1st in 60% 59% 49% 57%
1st pts 49/71 30/36 23/25 102/132
% 1st pts 69% 83% 92% 77%
2nd pts 24/48 14/25 17/26 55/99
% 2nd pts 50% 56% 65% 56%
Breaks
Won 4 2 2 8
Converted 4/5 2/5 2/3 8/13
Converted % 80% 40% 67% 62%
Conceded 9 4 0 13
Saved 6/9 4/4 0/0 10
Saved % 67% 100% 56%
Times Broken 3 0 0 3

Tennis Scores in Taipei Challenger

Upcoming matches in the draw