Murphy Cassone and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe will clash against each other in the quarter of the Knoxville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Murphy Cassone who should win in 3 sets.
Murphy Cassone -> 1.49
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Murphy Cassone vs. Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
There is no head to head record between Murphy Cassone and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Murphy Cassone
38 - 30win/loss
211
172
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42-31 | 17-14 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-18 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-9 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 245, Murphy got to the quarter after defeating Gage Brymer 6-3 6-1, Alejandro Moreno 6-2 6-0, Matias Soto 6-3 6-2 and Nicolas Mejia 6-3 5-7 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Murphy defeated Mejia (6-3 5-7 6-3). During the match, Cassone scored 98 points vs Mejia’s 85. Murphy was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cassone scored 13 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Murphy Cassone was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (42/54) of his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Cassone broke Mejia 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Murphy started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 60% of the points he played.
Cassone has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (104-71). 13-7 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Cassone has a composed40-18 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Murphy’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger,the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger and the Lugano Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 38-29 win-loss record in 2025, 13-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Knoxville Challenger
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
25 - 13win/loss
347
71
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-15 | 0-1 | 18-9 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2024 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-25 | 2-6 | 10-13 | 15-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-20 | 4-7 | 9-9 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 426, the German got to the quarter after defeating Alex Rybakov 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-0 and Oliver Tarvet 6-3 7-6(5).
In the 2nd round, Stebe had a good straight sets win against Tarvet (6-3 7-65). During the match Stebe scored 67 points vs Tarvet’s 56. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Stebe managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (36/48) of his 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The German broke Tarvet 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Stebe has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Augsburg Challenger where he beat Alexander Ritschard in the final 6-3 6-3.
Cedrik-Marcel has a composed 24-13 win-loss record in 2025, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Knoxville Challenger
Cedrik-Marcel has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cassone | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 77 | 54 |
| Pts | 271-184 | 179-146 |
| Total Points | 455 | 325 |
| Winners | 113 | 87 |
| %Winners | 42% | 49% |
Cassone played 4 matches while Stebe competed in 2 matches. Cassone started his run from the qualifications while Stebe had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Murphy Cassone lost 1 set, while Cedrik-Marcel Stebe surrendered 1 set. Cassone has played 4 sets more than Stebe (9 vs 5). Therefore, Cassone played 23 games more than Stebe. Cassone scored 113 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Stebe blasted 87 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cassone | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 41 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 10.3 | 7 |
| 1st in | 140/217 | 114/163 |
| %1st in | 65% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 113/140 | 87/114 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 48/77 | 29/49 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 59% |
Cassone recorded 41 aces (10.3 per match). Stebe fired 14 aces (7 per match). Cassone won 81% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Stebe won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cassone | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 7 |
| Converted | 16/31 | 7/20 |
| % Converted | 52% | 35% |
| Conceded | 11 | 9 |
| Saved | 9 | 7 |
| % Saved | 82% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The American broke his opponents 16 times with a 52% conversion rate. Murphy lost his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 7 times with a 35% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cassone | ||||||
| Q1 Brymer | Q3 Moreno | R1 Soto | R2 Mejia | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-2 6-0 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 14 | 17 | 30 | 77 | |
| pts | 60-34 | 56-28 | 57-37 | 98-85 | 271-184 | |
| Total points | 94 | 84 | 94 | 183 | 455 | |
| Winners | 23 | 18 | 30 | 42 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 32% | 53% | 43% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 12 | 6 | 10 | 13 | 41 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 27/41 | 20/38 | 39/52 | 54/86 | 140/217 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 53% | 75% | 63% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 18/20 | 30/39 | 42/54 | 113/140 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 90% | 77% | 78% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 11/18 | 8/13 | 18/32 | 48/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 61% | 62% | 56% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 16 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/9 | 3/3 | 4/13 | 16/31 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 56% | 100% | 31% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 11 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 7/9 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 100% | 78% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Stebe | ||||||
| R1 Rybakov | R2 Tarvet | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 7-62 6-0 | 6-3 7-65 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |||
| Tot Games | 32 | 22 | 54 | |||
| pts | 112-90 | 67-56 | 179-146 | |||
| Total points | 202 | 123 | 325 | |||
| Winners | 51 | 36 | 87 | |||
| %Winners | 46% | 54% | 49% | |||
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 5 | 9 | 14 | |||
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | |||
| 1st in | 66/101 | 48/62 | 114/163 | |||
| % 1st in | 65% | 77% | 70% | |||
| 1st pts | 51/66 | 36/48 | 87/114 | |||
| % 1st pts | 77% | 75% | 76% | |||
| 2nd pts | 21/35 | 8/14 | 29/49 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 57% | 59% | |||
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |||
| Converted | 4/16 | 3/4 | 7/20 | |||
| Converted % | 25% | 75% | 35% | |||
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | |||
| Saved | 3/4 | 4/5 | 7 | |||
| Saved % | 75% | 80% | 39% | |||
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
Tennis Scores in Knoxville Challenger
- Patrick Harper/Quinn VandecasteeleHarper/Quinn Vandecasteele – Pranav Kumar/Noah SchachterKumar/Noah Schachter (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction