Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Tsung-Hao Huang will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Taipei Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 2 sets.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.169
Tsung-Hao Huang -> 4.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Tsung-Hao Huang
This will be the 4th time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Tsung-Hao Huang face off. The head to head is 2-1 for Lam Coleman Wong (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Lam Coleman Wong won 4-6 7-5 6-3 in the quarter in the Shenzhen 2 Challenger back in 2023.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
30 - 29win/loss
143
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-30 | 20-18 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 152, Lam Coleman Wong reached the 2nd round after beating Luca Castelnuovo 6-4 4-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, Chak defeated Castelnuovo (6-4 4-6 7-5). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 105 points vs Castelnuovo’s 102. Chak was very aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong made 15 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 60% of his first serves in, winning 69% (49/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (24/48) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Castelnuovo 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (162-129). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed7-8 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Chak’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Seoul Challenger.
Lam Coleman Wong has a composed 30-29 win-loss record in 2025, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Taipei Challenger
Tsung-Hao Huang
41 - 29win/loss
479
474
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-32 | 39-28 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-30 | 25-28 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-21 | 23-19 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-21 | 28-17 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-9 | 5-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 474 (career-high), Huang got to the 2nd round after defeating Evan Zhu 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Huang had a good straight sets win against Zhu (6-2 6-1). During the match Huang scored 63 points vs Zhu’s 36. Huang was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Huang scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Tsung-Hao Huang was pretty effective on serve to win 85% (23/27) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Huang broke Zhu 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
The Chinese’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Osaka and M15 Luan.
Tsung-Hao has a composed 41-29 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Taipei Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 15 |
| Pts | 105-102 | 63-36 |
| Total Points | 207 | 99 |
| Winners | 49 | 23 |
| %Winners | 47% | 37% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Huang played 1 match. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded 1 set while Tsung-Hao Huang hasn’t conceded a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set more than Huang (3 vs 2). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 17 games more than Huang. The scored 49 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese managed to score 23 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 1 |
| 1st in | 71/119 | 27/39 |
| %1st in | 60% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 49/71 | 23/27 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 9/12 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 75% |
Lam Coleman Wong struck 15 aces . Huang managed to score 1 ace . Lam Coleman Wong won 69% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Huang won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/12 |
| % Converted | 80% | 33% |
| Conceded | 9 | 0 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Chak dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Chinese broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Tsung-Hao was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Castelnuovo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 105-102 | 105-102 | |
| Total points | 207 | 207 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 71/119 | 71/119 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 49/71 | 49/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 24/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Huang | |||
| R1 Zhu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 63-36 | 63-36 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/39 | 27/39 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 23/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/12 | 9/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Taipei Challenger
- James McCabeMcCabe – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Elias YmerYmer (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-4) – H2H and prediction