Luca Nardi and Viktor Durasovic will play each other in the 2nd round of the Helsinki Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Luca Nardi who should win in 3 sets.
Luca Nardi -> 1.4
Viktor Durasovic -> 2.68
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Luca Nardi vs. Viktor Durasovic
This will be the 2nd time that Luca Nardi and Viktor Durasovic play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Durasovic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Durasovic won 7-5 6-3 in the 1st round in the Bergamo Challenger back in 2020.
Luca Nardi
29 - 29win/loss
87
67
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-30 | 14-13 | 8-9 | 8-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-27 | 14-14 | 8-5 | 9-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-36 | 20-10 | 8-13 | 12-12 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-20 | 5-2 | 11-10 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-24 | 3-3 | 26-13 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 81, the Italian reached the 2nd round after beating Edas Butvilas 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Butvilas (6-4 6-2). During the match, Nardi scored 56 points vs Butvilas’s 43. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nardi fired 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Luca Nardi was pretty effective on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nardi broke Butvilas 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Nardi has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 55% of his matches (182-149). 7-5 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nardi has a compiled50-42 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Luca’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Koblenz Challenger.
Nardi has a composed 29-29 win-loss record in 2025, 7-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Helsinki Challenger
Viktor Durasovic
30 - 30win/loss
238
222
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-33 | 8-10 | 5-9 | 20-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 48-33 | 19-10 | 15-15 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-37 | 5-8 | 17-18 | 2-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 28-36 | 2-7 | 15-18 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-24 | 2-4 | 13-12 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 247, the Norwegian reached the 2nd round after beating Rudolf Molleker 6-2 4-6 6-1, Matteo Martineau 3-6 6-3 6-4 and Federico Cina 7-6(6) 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Norwegian had a good straight sets win against Cina (7-66 6-4). During the match Durasovic scored 73 points vs Cina’s 65. The Norwegian was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Durasovic blasted 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Viktor Durasovic lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Durasovic put 59% of his first serves in, winning 79% (30/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (13/26) on the 2nd serve. Durasovic broke Cina 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Nottingham Challenger where he beat Henry Searle in the final 7-6(6) 3-6 6-1.
Durasovic has a compiled 30-30 win-loss record in 2025, 17-10 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Helsinki Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nardi | Durasovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 76 |
| Pts | 56-43 | 258-227 |
| Total Points | 99 | 485 |
| Winners | 28 | 93 |
| %Winners | 50% | 36% |
Nardi played 1 match while Durasovic competed in 3 matches. Durasovic started his run from the qualifications while Nardi had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Viktor Durasovic surrendered 2 sets while Luca Nardi hasn’t lost a set so far. Nardi has played 6 set(s) less than Durasovic (2 vs 8). Therefore, Nardi played 58 games less than Durasovic. The Italian scored 28 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, Viktor managed to score 93 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nardi | Durasovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 35/52 | 120/236 |
| %1st in | 67% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 93/120 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 57/116 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 49% |
Nardi blasted 2 aces . Durasovic made 12 aces (4 per match). Nardi won 80% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Durasovic won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nardi | Durasovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 13 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 13/26 |
| % Converted | 60% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 19 |
| Saved | 2 | 11 |
| % Saved | 100% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 8 |
Nardi broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Luca pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. Durasovic broke his opponents 13 times with a 50% conversion rate. Viktor conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nardi | |||
| R1 Butvilas | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 56-43 | 56-43 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 35/52 | 35/52 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 28/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Durasovic | |||||
| Q1 Molleker | Q3 Martineau | R1 Cina | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | 7-66 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 28 | 23 | 76 | |
| pts | 90-72 | 95-90 | 73-65 | 258-227 | |
| Total points | 162 | 185 | 138 | 485 | |
| Winners | 27 | 36 | 30 | 93 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 38% | 41% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 1 | 5 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 4 | 4 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 32/86 | 50/86 | 38/64 | 120/236 | |
| % 1st in | 37% | 58% | 59% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 27/32 | 36/50 | 30/38 | 93/120 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 72% | 79% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/54 | 16/36 | 13/26 | 57/116 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 44% | 50% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/11 | 3/6 | 13/26 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 45% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 8 | 2 | 19 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 4/8 | 0/2 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 50% | 0% | 128% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
Tennis Scores in Helsinki Challenger
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Matej DodigDodig (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marin CilicCilic – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (4-3) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eero VasaVasa – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Calvin HemeryHemery (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction