Patrick Kypson and Calvin Hemery will square off in the 2nd round of the Helsinki Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 6:00 pm on COURT 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 3 sets.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.42
Calvin Hemery -> 2.61
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Patrick Kypson vs. Calvin Hemery
This will be the 4th time that Patrick Kypson and Calvin Hemery clash against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Kypson (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they squared off, Kypson won 6-4 6-3 in the 1st round in the Captif Challenger back in September 2025.
Patrick Kypson
41 - 15win/loss
117
117
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45-15 | 19-8 | 7-1 | 19-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-27 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 146, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Geoffrey Blancaneaux 5-7 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round against Blancaneaux, Patrick recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-1 6-3). During the match, Kypson scored 107 points vs Blancaneaux’s 88. Patrick was quite aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kypson struck 8 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Patrick Kypson lost the serve 3 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Kypson put 65% of his first serves in, winning 71% (50/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (16/37) on the 2nd serve. Patrick broke Blancaneaux 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Kypson has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (243-139). 15-5 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kypson has an overall 54-26 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Bogota Challenger where he defeated Pedro Sakamoto in the final 6-1 6-3 and the Little Rock Challenger where he beat Michael Zheng in the final 6-1 1-6 7-5 and the Sioux Falls Challenger where he defeated Johannus Monday in the final 6-7(2) 7-6(4) 7-5.
The American has a compiled 41-15 win-loss record in 2025, 15-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Helsinki Challenger
Kypson has never competed in this tournament before.
Calvin Hemery
30 - 32win/loss
257
116
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-33 | 3-6 | 21-16 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-33 | 1-3 | 27-19 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 49-25 | 8-2 | 28-14 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-29 | 6-6 | 19-16 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-20 | 8-6 | 20-8 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 231, the French player got to the 2nd round after defeating Nerman Fatic 6-3 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Fatic (6-3 7-64). During the match Hemery scored 81 points vs Fatic’s 71. Hemery was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Hemery bagged 13 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Calvin Hemery lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Hemery put 61% of his first serves in, winning 75% (36/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Fatic 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Calvin’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Brazzaville Challenger and the Troyes Challenger.
Calvin has an overall 30-32 win-loss record in 2025, 6-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kypson | Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 22 |
| Pts | 107-88 | 81-71 |
| Total Points | 195 | 152 |
| Winners | 50 | 36 |
| %Winners | 47% | 44% |
Both Kypson and Hemery played 1 match. At the moment, Patrick Kypson dropped 1 set while Calvin Hemery hasn’t conceded a set so far. Kypson has played 1 set more than Hemery (3 vs 2). Therefore, Kypson played 6 games more than Hemery. Patrick scored 50 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Hemery fired 36 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kypson | Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 13 |
| 1st in | 70/107 | 48/79 |
| %1st in | 65% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 50/70 | 36/48 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 16/37 | 13/31 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 42% |
Kypson recorded 8 aces . Hemery recorded 13 aces . Kypson won 71% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Hemery won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kypson | Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 60% | 38% |
| Conceded | 13 | 6 |
| Saved | 10 | 4 |
| % Saved | 77% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Kypson broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Kypson conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded. Hemery broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Hemery conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kypson | |||
| R1 Blancaneaux | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 107-88 | 107-88 | |
| Total points | 195 | 195 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 70/107 | 70/107 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 50/70 | 50/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/37 | 16/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Hemery | |||
| R1 Fatic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 81-71 | 81-71 | |
| Total points | 152 | 152 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 48/79 | 48/79 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 36/48 | 36/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Helsinki Challenger
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Stuart ParkerParker (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Federico CinaCina (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Eero VasaVasa – Luka MikrutMikrut (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Brandon HoltHolt (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Borna GojoGojo (3-6 7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Edas ButvilasButvilas (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Dusan LajovicLajovic (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (5-7 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Justin EngelEngel (6-4 6-73 6-4) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Oskari PaldaniusPaldanius (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Marin CilicCilic – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Nerman FaticFatic (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-2 6-73 6-4) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Dusan LajovicLajovic (6-3 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Borna GojoGojo (3-6 7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Justin EngelEngel (6-4 6-7(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (5-7 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Brandon HoltHolt (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Eero VasaVasa – Luka MikrutMikrut (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Stuart ParkerParker (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Federico CinaCina (7-6(6) 6-4) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Edas ButvilasButvilas (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marin CilicCilic – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eero VasaVasa – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Calvin HemeryHemery (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction