James Duckworth and Michael Vrbensky will square off in the 2nd round of the Taipei Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Duckworth who should win in 2 sets.
James Duckworth -> 1.123
Michael Vrbensky -> 5.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Michael Vrbensky
There is no head to head record between James Duckworth and Michael Vrbensky since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
James Duckworth
33 - 31win/loss
106
46
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38-33 | 17-19 | 6-4 | 10-4 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-29 | 23-14 | 2-3 | 7-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-28 | 43-21 | 1-3 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-27 | 20-18 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-24 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 12-9 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 113, James reached the 2nd round after beating Taro Daniel 2-6 7-6(2) 6-2.
In the 1st round against Daniel, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-62 6-2). During the match, Duckworth scored 91 points vs Daniel’s 88. James was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Duckworth made 12 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Overall, James Duckworth was exceptionally effective on serve to win 74% (42/57) of his 1st serve and 53% (20/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The Australian broke Daniel 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Duckworth has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (311-209). 7-3 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Duckworth has a composed 37-30 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the San Luis Potosi Challenger where he defeated Max Wiskandt in the final 6-1 6-1.
The Australian has a compiled 33-31 win-loss record in 2025, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Taipei Challenger
Michael Vrbensky
24 - 28win/loss
636
277
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-30 | 3-3 | 19-20 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-27 | 4-4 | 32-18 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 58-28 | 11-6 | 44-21 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 54-27 | 7-3 | 37-16 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 17-24 | 2-1 | 14-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 715, the Czech reached the 2nd round after defeating Chun-Chien Hou 7-6(4) 6-4, Michael Zhu 6-4 6-3 and Sidharth Rawat 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4.
In the 1st round, Vrbensky defeated Rawat (6-4 6-73 6-4). During the match Vrbensky scored 111 points vs Rawat’s 96. Michael was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Vrbensky struck 10 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Michael Vrbensky was extremely effective on serve to win 78% (42/54) of his 1st serve and 53% (18/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Vrbensky broke Rawat 5 times after converting 31% of his break points (5/16).
Vrbensky’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Opatija.
The Czech has a composed 24-28 win-loss record in 2025, 4-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Taipei Challenger
Vrbensky has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Duckworth | Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 75 |
| Pts | 91-88 | 266-227 |
| Total Points | 179 | 493 |
| Winners | 42 | 104 |
| %Winners | 46% | 39% |
Duckworth played 1 match while Vrbensky competed in 3 matches. Vrbensky started his run from the qualifications while Duckworth had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. James Duckworth lost 1 set, while Michael Vrbensky lost 1 set. Duckworth has played 4 set(s) less than Vrbensky (3 vs 7). Therefore, Duckworth played 46 games less than Vrbensky. James scored 42 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Michael scored 104 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Duckworth | Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 5.3 |
| 1st in | 57/95 | 132/232 |
| %1st in | 60% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 42/57 | 104/132 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 20/38 | 49/100 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 49% |
Duckworth managed to score 12 aces . Vrbensky bagged 16 aces (5.3 per match). Duckworth won 74% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Vrbensky won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Duckworth | Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 11 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 11/32 |
| % Converted | 25% | 34% |
| Conceded | 10 | 18 |
| Saved | 7 | 12 |
| % Saved | 70% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 6 |
Duckworth broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. James dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponents 11 times with a 34% conversion rate. Vrbensky conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Duckworth | |||
| R1 Daniel | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 91-88 | 91-88 | |
| Total points | 179 | 179 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 57/95 | 57/95 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 42/57 | 42/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/38 | 20/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 7/10 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Vrbensky | |||||
| Q1 Hou | Q3 Zhu | R1 Rawat | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | 6-4 6-3 | 6-4 6-73 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 19 | 33 | 75 | |
| pts | 92-80 | 63-51 | 111-96 | 266-227 | |
| Total points | 172 | 114 | 207 | 493 | |
| Winners | 37 | 25 | 42 | 104 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | 38% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 10 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 7 | 6 | 23 | |
| 1st in | 45/80 | 33/64 | 54/88 | 132/232 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 52% | 61% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 37/45 | 25/33 | 42/54 | 104/132 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 76% | 78% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/35 | 14/31 | 18/34 | 49/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 45% | 53% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 2/12 | 4/4 | 5/16 | 11/32 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 100% | 31% | 34% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 | 5 | 18 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 1/3 | 2/5 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 33% | 40% | 163% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
Tennis Scores in Taipei Challenger
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Shinji HazawaHazawa (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (2-6 7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Tung-Lin WuWu (4-6 6-3 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Sidharth RawatRawat (6-4 6-73 6-4) – See score progression
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-3 7-613) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Marek GengelGengel (6-0 7-68) – See score progression
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Kuan-Yi LeeLee (6-3 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (2-6 7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Taisei IchikawaIchikawa (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Cing-Yang MengMeng (6-75 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Tsung-Hao HuangHuang – Evan ZhuZhu (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Taro DanielDaniel (2-6 7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Sidharth RawatRawat (6-4 6-7(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Marek GengelGengel (6-0 7-6(8)) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Tung-Lin WuWu (4-6 6-3 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Taisei IchikawaIchikawa (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (2-6 7-6(3) 6-2) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Kuan-Yi LeeLee (6-3 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Arthur WeberWeber (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Uisung ParkPark – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Shinji HazawaHazawa – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-0) – H2H and prediction