Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ji Sung Nam who should win in 2 sets.
Ji Sung Nam -> 1.34
Takeru Yuzuki -> 2.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Takeru Yuzuki vs. Ji Sung Nam
There is no head to head record between Takeru Yuzuki and Ji Sung Nam since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Takeru Yuzuki
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-6 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Japanese reached the qualifications after beating Daisuke Sumizawa 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Yuzuki had a good straight sets win against Sumizawa (6-4 6-3). During the match, Yuzuki scored 59 points vs Sumizawa’s 39. Takeru was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Yuzuki scored 10 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Takeru Yuzuki was very effective on serve to win 88% (21/24) of his 1st serve and 94% (15/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Japanese broke Sumizawa 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Yuzuki has a weak match record in the last 6 years having won 44% of his matches (16-20). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Yuzuki has an aggregate1-0 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Takeru has an aggregate 2-2 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Taipei Challenger
The Japanese has never competed in this tournament before.
Ji Sung Nam
19 - 13win/loss
692
236
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-16 | 18-12 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 14-21 | 12-10 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-6 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-20 | 13-15 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-19 | 24-13 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-7 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 770, Ji reached the qualifications after beating Ren Nakamura 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Sung Nam had a good straight sets win against Nakamura (6-1 6-2). During the match Sung Nam scored 65 points vs Nakamura’s 39. Ji was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Sung Nam scored 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Ji Sung Nam was very effective on serve to win 87% (20/23) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sung Nam broke Nakamura 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
The Korean’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Daegu.
Sung Nam has an aggregate 19-13 win-loss record in 2025, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Taipei Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Yuzuki | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 15 |
| Pts | 59-39 | 65-39 |
| Total Points | 98 | 104 |
| Winners | 21 | 20 |
| %Winners | 36% | 31% |
Both Yuzuki and Sung Nam played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Yuzuki and Sung Nam have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Yuzuki played 4 games more than Sung Nam. Yuzuki scored 21 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Ji managed to score 20 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Yuzuki | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 3 |
| 1st in | 24/40 | 23/42 |
| %1st in | 60% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 20/23 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 87% |
| 2nd pts | 15/16 | 13/19 |
| %2nd pts | 94% | 68% |
Yuzuki fired 10 aces . Sung Nam fired 3 aces . Yuzuki won 88% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 94% of the points. On the other side, Sung Nam won 87% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Yuzuki | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 50% | 36% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Yuzuki pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Sung Nam broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Ji was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Yuzuki | |||
| Q1 Sumizawa | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 59-39 | 59-39 | |
| Total points | 98 | 98 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/40 | 24/40 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 21/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/16 | 15/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 94% | 94% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Sung Nam | |||
| Q1 Nakamura | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 65-39 | 65-39 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 23/42 | 23/42 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 20/23 | 20/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Arthur WeberWeber (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Taro DanielDaniel (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Kaichi UchidaUchida (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Tung-Lin WuWu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- S D Prajwal DevD Prajwal Dev – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Uisung ParkPark – Digvijaypratap SinghSingh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Kuan-Yi LeeLee (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tsung-Hao HuangHuang – Evan ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Michael ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taisei IchikawaIchikawa – Kristjan TammTamm (0-0) – H2H and prediction