Martin Damm and Rafael Jodar will play each other in the final of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rafael Jodar who should win in 3 sets.
Rafael Jodar -> 1.46
Martin Damm -> 2.49
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Martin Damm vs. Rafael Jodar
This will be the 2nd time that Martin Damm and Rafael Jodar face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Jodar (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Jodar won 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 in the final in the Lincoln Challenger back in October 2025.
Martin Damm
52 - 20win/loss
175
173
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52-20 | 36-13 | 0-2 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 15-20 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 191, Damm reached the final after beating Charles Broom 6-3 6-3, Keegan Smith 6-1 7-5, Daniil Glinka 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 and Mats Rosenkranz 7-6(3) 6-4.
In the semifinal, Martin had a good straight sets win against Rosenkranz (7-63 6-4). During the match, Damm scored 77 points vs Rosenkranz’s 68. Martin was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Damm overpowered his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Martin Damm lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Damm put 59% of his first serves in, winning 80% (32/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (13/28) on the 2nd serve. Damm broke Rosenkranz twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Damm has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (188-128). 16-4 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Damm has an overall46-30 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Martin’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M25 Tbilisi,M15 Vaasa,M25 Elvas,the Columbus Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Martin has a compiled 52-19 win-loss record in 2025, 16-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Rafael Jodar
39 - 12win/loss
168
166
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-12 | 23-9 | 3-1 | 13-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 207 (career-high), the Spaniard got to the final after defeating Murphy Cassone 6-4 7-5, Saba Purtseladze 6-4 6-0, Dylan Dietrich 7-5 6-3 and Johannus Monday 6-4 4-2 ret..
In the semifinal against Monday, Jodar had a free pass after Monday retired on a 6-4 4-2 . scoreline.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Hersonissos 3 Challenger where he defeated Dan Added in the final 6-4 6-2 and the Lincoln Challenger where he defeated Martin Damm in the final 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3.
Jodar has a composed 38-12 win-loss record in 2025, 12-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Damm | Jodar |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 93 | 75 |
| Pts | 301-258 | 293-231 |
| Total Points | 559 | 524 |
| Winners | 137 | 110 |
| %Winners | 46% | 38% |
Both Damm and Jodar played 4 matches. At the moment, Martin Damm conceded 1 set while Rafael Jodar hasn’t lost a set so far. Talking about their workload, Damm and Jodar have played the same amount of sets 9. However, Damm played 18 games more than Jodar. Damm scored 137 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Jodar bagged 110 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Damm | Jodar |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 61 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 15.3 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 160/258 | 143/247 |
| %1st in | 62% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 137/160 | 110/143 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 50/98 | 58/104 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 56% |
Damm managed to score 61 aces (15.3 per match). Jodar blasted 22 aces (5.5 per match). Damm won 86% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Jodar won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Damm | Jodar |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 12 |
| Converted | 11/26 | 12/30 |
| % Converted | 42% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 17 |
| Saved | 3 | 15 |
| % Saved | 75% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The American broke his opponents 11 times with a 42% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Jodar broke his opponents 12 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve twice and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Damm | ||||||
| R1 Broom | R2 Smith | 1/4 Glinka | 1/2 Rosenkranz | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-1 7-5 | 6-73 6-4 6-4 | 7-63 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 19 | 33 | 23 | 93 | |
| pts | 55-43 | 68-50 | 101-97 | 77-68 | 301-258 | |
| Total points | 98 | 118 | 198 | 145 | 559 | |
| Winners | 24 | 26 | 55 | 32 | 137 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 38% | 54% | 42% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 8 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 61 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 28/48 | 30/46 | 62/96 | 40/68 | 160/258 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 65% | 65% | 59% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 24/28 | 26/30 | 55/62 | 32/40 | 137/160 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 87% | 89% | 80% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 10/16 | 15/34 | 13/28 | 50/98 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 63% | 44% | 46% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/10 | 2/4 | 2/6 | 11/26 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 50% | 33% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 1/2 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 100% | 50% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Jodar | ||||||
| R1 Cassone | R2 Purtseladze | 1/4 Dietrich | 1/2 Monday | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | 6-4 6-0 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 4-2 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 16 | 21 | 16 | 75 | |
| pts | 84-70 | 65-39 | 84-73 | 60-49 | 293-231 | |
| Total points | 154 | 104 | 157 | 109 | 524 | |
| Winners | 32 | 17 | 38 | 23 | 110 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 26% | 45% | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 7 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 43/74 | 18/39 | 51/84 | 31/50 | 143/247 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 46% | 61% | 62% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 17/18 | 38/51 | 23/31 | 110/143 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 94% | 75% | 74% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 15/21 | 16/33 | 10/19 | 58/104 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 71% | 48% | 53% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 4/7 | 2/8 | 3/10 | 12/30 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 57% | 25% | 30% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 17 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 0/0 | 7/7 | 1/2 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 88% | – | 100% | 50% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |