Janice Tjen and Kimberly Birrell will fight against each other in the final of the Chennai Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 6:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Janice Tjen who should win in 3 sets.
Janice Tjen -> 1.5
Kimberly Birrell -> 2.58
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Janice Tjen vs. Kimberly Birrell
There is no head to head record between Janice Tjen and Kimberly Birrell since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Janice Tjen
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 77-15 | 72-15 | 0-0 | 5-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-3 | 28-2 | 13-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 82, Tjen got to the final after beating Caroline Werner 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2, Linda Fruhvirtova 2-6 6-3 6-2, Mia Pohankova 6-3 6-1 and Lanlana Tararudee 7-6(6) 7-6(5).
In the semifinal, Janice had a good straight sets win against Tararudee (7-66 7-65). During the match, Tjen scored 92 points vs Tararudee’s 86. Janice was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tjen struck 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Janice Tjen lost the serve twice and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Tjen put 64% of her first serves in, winning 70% (38/54) of the points behind her 1st serve and 67% (20/30) on the 2nd serve. Janice broke Tararudee twice after converting 22% of her break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Indonesian has dropped 2 set in this tournament to win 54% of the points she played.
Tjen has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 84% of her matches (125-24). 71-15 on hard in 2025. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Tjen has an aggregate107-23 record in the last 4 years on hard.
Her best result of the current season was conquering the title the W35 Goyang where she defeated Lin Zhu in the final 6-4 6-1 and the W35 Andong where she overcame Yexin Ma in the final 6-4 6-2 and the W35 Luzhou where she beat Fangzhou Liu in the final 6-0 6-4 and the W50 Taizhou where she beat Yidi Yang in the final 7-5 6-3 and the W35 Taipei where she beat Momoko Kobori in the final 4-6 6-1 6-2 and the Jinan where she beat Anna Bondar in the final 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Tjen has a compiled 76-15 win-loss record in 2025, 71-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Chennai
Tjen has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimberly Birrell
36 - 27win/loss
95
60
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38-28 | 28-16 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-30 | 22-19 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 12-4 | 5-0 |
| 2023 | 42-33 | 32-21 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 41-25 | 38-20 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 117, Birrell got to the final after beating Nikola Bartunkova 1-6 6-1 6-3
, Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty 7-5 7-6(2), Donna Vekic 6-4 6-0 and Joanna Garland 6-7(2) 6-3 7-5.In the semifinal against Garland, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 6-3 7-5). During the match Birrell scored 116 points vs Garland’s 104. Birrell was very aggressive to blast 56 winners.
About the serving games, Birrell fired 3 aces and she committed only 8 double faults. Kimberly Birrell lost the serve twice and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Birrell put 65% of her first serves in, winning 86% (56/65) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (13/35) on the 2nd serve. Kimberly broke Garland 4 times after converting 22% of her break points (4/18).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Birrell has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title the W75 Brisbane where she beat Maddison Inglis in the final 6-2 4-6 7-6(2).
Kimberly has an overall 36-27 win-loss record in 2025, 26-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tjen | Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 98 | 98 |
| Pts | 342-287 | 344-280 |
| Total Points | 629 | 624 |
| Winners | 138 | 134 |
| %Winners | 40% | 39% |
Both Tjen and Birrell played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Janice Tjen lost 2 sets, while Kimberly Birrell lost 2 sets. Talking about their workload, Tjen and Birrell have played the same amount of sets 10. They also played the same amount of games (98). Tjen scored 138 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian recorded 134 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tjen | Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2.3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 194/294 | 180/278 |
| %1st in | 66% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 138/194 | 134/180 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 61/100 | 43/98 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 44% |
Tjen recorded 9 aces (2.3 per match). Birrell blasted 8 aces (2 per match). Tjen won 71% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Birrell won 74% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tjen | Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 17 | 21 |
| Converted | 17/40 | 21/57 |
| % Converted | 43% | 37% |
| Conceded | 24 | 22 |
| Saved | 16 | 9 |
| % Saved | 67% | 41% |
| Times Broken | 8 | 13 |
Janice broke her opponents 17 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Indonesian conceded her serve 8 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Australian broke her opponents 21 times with a 37% conversion rate. Kimberly conceded her serve 13 times and she saved 41% of the break points that she conceded.
| Tjen | ||||||
| R1 Uebelhoer | R2 Fruhvirtova | 1/4 Pohankova | 1/2 Tararudee | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-75 6-2 | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-1 | 7-66 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 25 | 16 | 26 | 98 | |
| pts | 96-84 | 86-74 | 68-43 | 92-86 | 342-287 | |
| Total points | 180 | 160 | 111 | 178 | 629 | |
| Winners | 42 | 36 | 22 | 38 | 138 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 32% | 41% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 55/87 | 54/77 | 31/46 | 54/84 | 194/294 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 70% | 67% | 64% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 42/55 | 36/54 | 22/31 | 38/54 | 138/194 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 67% | 71% | 70% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/32 | 9/23 | 10/15 | 20/30 | 61/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 39% | 67% | 67% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 17 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 6/11 | 5/12 | 2/9 | 17/40 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 55% | 42% | 22% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 24 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 7/11 | 3/4 | 4/6 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 64% | 75% | 67% | 68% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |
| Birrell | ||||||
| R1 Bartunkova | R2 Rashmikaa | 1/4 Vekic | 1/2 Garland | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | 7-5 7-62 | 6-4 6-0 | 6-72 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 25 | 16 | 34 | 98 | |
| pts | 73-59 | 97-86 | 58-31 | 116-104 | 344-280 | |
| Total points | 132 | 183 | 89 | 220 | 624 | |
| Winners | 29 | 27 | 22 | 56 | 134 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 28% | 38% | 48% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 22 | |
| 1st in | 46/64 | 41/71 | 28/43 | 65/100 | 180/278 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 58% | 65% | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 29/46 | 27/41 | 22/28 | 56/65 | 134/180 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 66% | 79% | 86% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 11/30 | 12/15 | 13/35 | 43/98 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 37% | 80% | 37% | 44% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 21 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 7/22 | 4/9 | 4/18 | 21/57 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 32% | 44% | 22% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 22 | |
| Saved | 2/7 | 3/9 | 0/0 | 4/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 29% | 33% | – | 67% | 32% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 13 | |