Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Sho Shimabukuro will face off in the final of the Seoul Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 2:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.8
Sho Shimabukuro -> 1.88

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Sho Shimabukuro

This will be the 3rd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Sho Shimabukuro square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Shimabukuro (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.

The last time that they played each other, Shimabukuro won 7-6(5) 6-2 in the 1st round in the Kobe Challenger back in 2024.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

29 - 28win/loss

Hard
20-17
I Hard
1-1
Clay
2-6
Grass
6-4
Rank
143
High
128
LWWWLWWWWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 32-30 20-18 2-6 4-2 6-4 0-0
2024 41-36 39-26 0-2 2-4 0-4 0-0
2023 53-27 42-19 9-7 2-1 0-0 0-0
2022 24-19 20-12 3-5 1-2 0-0 0-0
2021 11-7 5-4 6-3 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 161, Chak reached the final after beating Hyeon Chung 6-3 6-2, Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-4 7-6(3), Bu Yunchaokete 6-3 6-4 and Yi Zhou 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2.

In the semifinal, Chak defeated Zhou (7-62 4-6 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 100 points vs Zhou’s 89. The was very aggressive to blast 42 winners.

Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong blasted 14 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 64% of his first serves in, winning 69% (42/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (22/35) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Zhou 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Chak has conceded 1 set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points he played.

Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (161-128). 20-17 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has an overall129-89 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.

The’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Seoul Challenger.

Chak has an aggregate 29-28 win-loss record in 2025, 20-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Seoul Challenger

Seoul Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong's Record

Sho Shimabukuro

Sho Shimabukuro

27 - 21win/loss

Hard
24-18
I Hard
0-0
Grass
3-3
Rank
145
High
135
LWWLWWWWWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 34-23 29-19 0-0 2-1 3-3 0-0
2024 30-28 21-17 1-3 3-5 5-3 0-0
2023 43-26 19-17 7-1 9-4 8-4 0-0
2022 42-25 38-20 0-2 4-3 0-0 0-0
2021 31-20 28-18 0-0 3-2 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 193, Sho reached the final after beating Omar Jasika 6-3 5-7 7-6(4), Rio Noguchi 6-4 6-3, Kasidit Samrej 6-3 6-4 and Elias Ymer 6-1 4-6 6-3.

In the semifinal, The Japanese defeated Ymer (6-1 4-6 6-3). During the match Shimabukuro scored 94 points vs Ymer’s 77. Sho was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.

Talking about serving, Shimabukuro fired 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Sho Shimabukuro was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (32/43) of his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Sho broke Ymer 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Sho has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.

His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Zhangjiagang Challenger where he defeated Oliver Crawford in the final 6-3 3-6 7-5.

The Japanese has a composed 27-21 win-loss record in 2025, 24-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Seoul Challenger

Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See his history.

Seoul Challenger
Shimabukuro's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

C.Lam Wong
S.Shimabukuro
6h:01
6h:01
Time on court​
6h:56
6h:56
!
2h:01
2h:01
Last match​
!
2h:01
2h:01
4
4
Match played
4
4
90
90
Games Played​
98
98
9
9
Set played​​
10
10
304
304
Total points​
349
349
76
76
Avg point​
87.3
87.3
125
125
Winners
130
130
31.3
31.3
Avg Winners​
32.5
32.5
41%
41%
Ratio winners
37%
37%
-- Serve --
35
35
Aces
23
23
8.8
8.8
Avg Aces
5.8
5.8
8
8
Double Faults
13
13
2
2
Avg Double Faults
3.3
3.3
125/169
125/169
1st won total​
130/167
130/167
!
74%
74%
1st won %
!
78%
78%
54/98
54/98
2nd won total​
55/114
55/114
55%
55%
2nd won %
48%
48%
-- Break Points --
15/27
15/27
BP won
18/41
18/41
3.8/6.8
3.8/6.8
Avg BP won
4.5/10.3
4.5/10.3
!
56%
56%
Won
44%
44%
15
15
Conceded
19
19
3.8
3.8
Avg Conceded
4.8
4.8
7
7
Broken
8
8
1.8
1.8
Avg Broken
2
2
8
8
Saved
11
11

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Lam Coleman Wong Shimabukuro
Match played 4 4
Tot Set 9 10
Tot Games 90 98
Pts 304-241 349-296
Total Points 545 645
Winners 125 130
%Winners 41% 37%

Both Lam Coleman Wong and Shimabukuro played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set, while Sho Shimabukuro lost 2 sets. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set(s) less than Shimabukuro (9 vs 10). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 8 games less than Shimabukuro. The scored 125 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Shimabukuro struck 130 winners (37%).

Serve Performance

Serve Lam Coleman Wong Shimabukuro
Aces 35 23
Avg per match 8.8 5.8
1st in 169/267 167/281
%1st in 63% 59%
1st pts 125/169 130/167
%1st pts 74% 78%
2nd pts 54/98 55/114
%2nd pts 55% 48%

Lam Coleman Wong scored 35 aces (8.8 per match). Shimabukuro bagged 23 aces (5.8 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 74% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Shimabukuro won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Lam Coleman Wong Shimabukuro
Won 15 18
Converted 15/27 18/41
% Converted 56% 44%
Conceded 15 19
Saved 8 11
% Saved 53% 58%
Times Broken 7 8

The broke his opponents 15 times with a 56% conversion rate. Chak surrendered his serve 7 times and he saved 53% of the break points that he conceded. Shimabukuro broke his opponents 18 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.

Lam Coleman Wong
R1
Chung
R2
Hsiou Hsu
1/4
Yunchaokete
1/2
Zhou
Total
Score 6-3 6-2 6-4 7-63 6-3 6-4 7-62 4-6 6-2
Tot Set 2 2 2 3 9
Tot Games 17 23 19 31 90
pts 62-40 73-58 69-54 100-89 304-241
Total points 102 131 123 189 545
Winners 18 34 31 42 125
%Winners 29% 47% 45% 42% 41%
SERVE
Aces 3 10 8 14 35
Double Faults 0 4 2 2 8
1st in 28/45 43/69 37/57 61/96 169/267
% 1st in 62% 62% 65% 64% 63%
1st pts 18/28 34/43 31/37 42/61 125/169
% 1st pts 64% 79% 84% 69% 74%
2nd pts 10/17 11/26 11/20 22/35 54/98
% 2nd pts 59% 42% 55% 63% 55%
Breaks
Won 6 4 2 3 15
Converted 6/8 4/5 2/6 3/8 15/27
Converted % 75% 80% 33% 38% 56%
Conceded 4 5 1 5 15
Saved 2/4 2/5 1/1 3/5 8
Saved % 50% 40% 100% 60% 63%
Times Broken 2 3 0 2 7
Shimabukuro
R1
Jasika
R2
Noguchi
1/4
Samrej
1/2
Ymer
Total
Score 6-3 5-7 7-64 6-4 6-3 6-3 6-4 6-1 4-6 6-3
Tot Set 3 2 2 3 10
Tot Games 34 19 19 26 98
pts 113-111 66-44 76-64 94-77 349-296
Total points 224 110 140 171 645
Winners 46 23 29 32 130
%Winners 41% 35% 38% 34% 37%
SERVE
Aces 4 4 8 7 23
Double Faults 9 0 3 1 13
1st in 60/98 26/44 38/63 43/76 167/281
% 1st in 61% 59% 60% 57% 59%
1st pts 46/60 23/26 29/38 32/43 130/167
% 1st pts 77% 88% 76% 74% 78%
2nd pts 16/38 11/18 9/25 19/33 55/114
% 2nd pts 42% 61% 36% 58% 48%
Breaks
Won 4 4 5 5 18
Converted 4/13 4/7 5/12 5/9 18/41
Converted % 31% 57% 42% 56% 44%
Conceded 7 1 5 6 19
Saved 4/7 0/1 3/5 4/6 11
Saved % 57% 0% 60% 67% 46%
Times Broken 3 1 2 2 8

Upcoming matches in the draw