Martin Damm and Mats Rosenkranz will play each other in the semifinal of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 4:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Damm who should win in 3 sets.
Martin Damm -> 1.59
Mats Rosenkranz -> 2.18
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Martin Damm vs. Mats Rosenkranz
This will be the 2nd time that Martin Damm and Mats Rosenkranz square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Damm (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Damm won 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Champaign Challenger back in 2023.
Martin Damm
52 - 19win/loss
175
173
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52-20 | 36-13 | 0-2 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 15-20 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 191, the American got to the semifinal after beating Charles Broom 6-3 6-3, Keegan Smith 6-1 7-5 and Daniil Glinka 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter against Glinka, Damm recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-4 6-4). During the match, Damm scored 101 points vs Glinka’s 97. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 55 winners.
Talking about the service games, Damm overpowered his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Martin Damm conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Damm put 65% of his first serves in, winning 89% (55/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (15/34) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Glinka twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Martin has dropped 1 set in this event to win 54% of the points he played.
Damm has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (187-128). 15-4 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Damm has an overall45-30 win-loss record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Damm’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M25 Tbilisi,M15 Vaasa,M25 Elvas,the Columbus Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Martin has an overall 51-19 win-loss record in 2025, 15-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Mats Rosenkranz
42 - 31win/loss
254
254
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-33 | 12-14 | 5-6 | 23-11 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2024 | 36-23 | 7-4 | 13-7 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 35-34 | 4-9 | 4-10 | 22-12 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 31-36 | 2-4 | 7-14 | 14-13 | 2-4 | 6-1 |
| 2021 | 42-30 | 1-1 | 20-18 | 15-9 | 5-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 285 (career-high), Rosenkranz got to the semifinal after beating Andres Martin 6-4 4-6 6-3, Rinky Hijikata 6-3 6-4 and Oliver Tarvet 6-1 6-0.
In the quarter, Rosenkranz had a good straight sets win against Tarvet (6-1 6-0). During the match Rosenkranz scored 50 points vs Tarvet’s 11. Mats was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Rosenkranz fired 6 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mats Rosenkranz was quite effective on serve to win 95% (19/20) of his 1st serve and 71% (5/7) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mats broke Tarvet 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mats has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
Mats’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Oberhaching and M25 Plaisir.
Rosenkranz has an aggregate 42-30 win-loss record in 2025, 21-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Damm | Rosenkranz |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 70 | 61 |
| Pts | 224-190 | 220-160 |
| Total Points | 414 | 380 |
| Winners | 105 | 93 |
| %Winners | 47% | 42% |
Both Damm and Rosenkranz played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Martin Damm dropped 1 set, while Mats Rosenkranz conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Damm and Rosenkranz have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Damm played 9 games more than Rosenkranz. The American scored 105 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Mats made 93 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Damm | Rosenkranz |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 40 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 13.3 | 9 |
| 1st in | 120/190 | 127/200 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 105/120 | 93/127 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 37/70 | 47/73 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 64% |
Damm scored 40 aces (13.3 per match). Rosenkranz struck 27 aces (9 per match). Damm won 88% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Rosenkranz won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Damm | Rosenkranz |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 11 |
| Converted | 9/20 | 11/25 |
| % Converted | 45% | 44% |
| Conceded | 2 | 16 |
| Saved | 2 | 14 |
| % Saved | 100% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Martin broke his opponents 9 times with a 45% conversion rate. Martin extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. Rosenkranz broke his opponents 11 times with a 44% conversion rate. Mats conceded his serve twice and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Damm | |||||
| R1 Broom | R2 Smith | 1/4 Glinka | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-1 7-5 | 6-73 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 19 | 33 | 70 | |
| pts | 55-43 | 68-50 | 101-97 | 224-190 | |
| Total points | 98 | 118 | 198 | 414 | |
| Winners | 24 | 26 | 55 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 38% | 54% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 11 | 21 | 40 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 6 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 28/48 | 30/46 | 62/96 | 120/190 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 65% | 65% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 24/28 | 26/30 | 55/62 | 105/120 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 87% | 89% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 10/16 | 15/34 | 37/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 63% | 44% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/10 | 2/4 | 9/20 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 50% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 100% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Rosenkranz | |||||
| R1 Martin | R2 Hijikata | 1/4 Tarvet | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 19 | 13 | 61 | |
| pts | 114-102 | 56-47 | 50-11 | 220-160 | |
| Total points | 216 | 103 | 61 | 380 | |
| Winners | 52 | 22 | 19 | 93 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 39% | 38% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 10 | 6 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 76/118 | 31/55 | 20/27 | 127/200 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 56% | 74% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 52/76 | 22/31 | 19/20 | 93/127 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 71% | 95% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/42 | 19/24 | 5/7 | 47/73 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 79% | 71% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 2/5 | 6/8 | 11/25 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 40% | 75% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 1 | 0 | 16 | |
| Saved | 13/15 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 87% | 100% | – | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Tim Ruehl/Patrick ZahrajRuehl/Patrick Zahraj – Anirudh Chandrasekar/Reese StalderChandrasekar/Reese Stalder (1-6 7-65 11-9) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – (0-1) – H2H and prediction