Martin Damm and Daniil Glinka will square off in the quarter of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 8:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Glinka who should win in 3 sets.
Daniil Glinka -> 1.83
Martin Damm -> 1.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Martin Damm vs. Daniil Glinka
This will be the 2nd time that Martin Damm and Daniil Glinka play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Damm (see full H2H stats
), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.The last time that they fought against each other, Damm won 7-6(8) 7-6(2) in the quarter in M25 Setubal back in 2023.
Martin Damm
50 - 19win/loss
175
173
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52-20 | 36-13 | 0-2 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 15-20 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 191, the American got to the quarter after defeating Charles Broom 6-3 6-3
and Keegan Smith 6-1 7-5.In the 2nd round, Damm had a good straight sets win against Smith (6-1 7-5). During the match, Damm scored 68 points vs Smith’s 50. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Damm struck 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Martin Damm was very efficient on serve to win 87% (26/30) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Smith 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to conquer 57% of the points he played.
Damm has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (186-128). 14-4 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Damm has an overall44-30 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Damm’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M25 Tbilisi,M15 Vaasa,M25 Elvas,the Columbus Challenger and the Lincoln Challenger.
Martin has a composed 50-19 win-loss record in 2025, 14-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Daniil Glinka
52 - 21win/loss
191
191
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60-23 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 30-9 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 263 (career-high), Daniil reached the quarter after defeating Patrick Kypson 6-3 6-3 and Patrick Zahraj 7-6(4) 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Glinka had a good straight sets win against Zahraj (7-64 6-2). During the match Glinka scored 83 points vs Zahraj’s 75. Daniil was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Glinka managed to score 6 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Daniil Glinka lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Glinka put 52% of his first serves in, winning 70% (30/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (22/39) on the 2nd serve. Daniil broke Zahraj 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Daniil hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Daniil’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Trento,M25 Trimbach,the Cassis Challenger and M25 Nevers.
Glinka has a composed 52-21 win-loss record in 2025, 22-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Damm | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 37 | 39 |
| Pts | 123-93 | 148-127 |
| Total Points | 216 | 275 |
| Winners | 50 | 55 |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% |
Both Damm and Glinka played 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Damm and Glinka have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Damm played 2 games less than Glinka. Martin scored 50 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Daniil blasted 55 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Damm | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| 1st in | 58/94 | 72/138 |
| %1st in | 62% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 50/58 | 55/72 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 22/36 | 37/66 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 56% |
Damm recorded 19 aces (9.5 per match). Glinka managed to score 19 aces (9.5 per match). Damm won 86% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Damm | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/16 | 6/10 |
| % Converted | 44% | 60% |
| Conceded | 0 | 7 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The American broke his opponents 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. The American pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Estonian broke his opponents 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Daniil conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Damm | ||||
| R1 Broom | R2 Smith | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 19 | 37 | |
| pts | 55-43 | 68-50 | 123-93 | |
| Total points | 98 | 118 | 216 | |
| Winners | 24 | 26 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 38% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 11 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 28/48 | 30/46 | 58/94 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 65% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 24/28 | 26/30 | 50/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 87% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 10/16 | 22/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 63% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/10 | 7/16 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Glinka | ||||
| R1 Kypson | R2 Zahraj | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 21 | 39 | |
| pts | 65-52 | 83-75 | 148-127 | |
| Total points | 117 | 158 | 275 | |
| Winners | 25 | 30 | 55 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 36% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 13 | 6 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 29/56 | 43/82 | 72/138 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 30/43 | 55/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 70% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 22/39 | 37/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/6 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 50% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 4/5 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 80% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Anirudh Chandrasekar/Reese StalderChandrasekar/Reese Stalder – Jay Clarke/Tom HandsClarke/Tom Hands (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-1) – H2H and prediction