Joanna Garland and Mei Yamaguchi will square off in the 2nd round of the Chennai Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 7:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Joanna Garland who should win in 2 sets.
Joanna Garland -> 1.189
Mei Yamaguchi -> 4.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Joanna Garland vs. Mei Yamaguchi
This will be the 2nd time that Joanna Garland and Mei Yamaguchi play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Garland (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Garland won 6-0 6-2 in the qualifications in the W25 The Hague back in 2021.
Joanna Garland
44 - 20win/loss
123
120
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-21 | 16-12 | 12-3 | 1-2 | 4-2 | 13-2 |
| 2024 | 43-9 | 28-8 | 5-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 10-0 |
| 2023 | 39-23 | 17-11 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 10-4 | 10-2 |
| 2022 | 50-24 | 39-11 | 0-0 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-13 | 6-7 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 132, Garland got to the 2nd round after beating Arianne Hartono 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Hartono (6-4 6-3). During the match, Garland scored 67 points vs Hartono’s 57. Garland was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Garland scored 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Joanna Garland lost the serve 4 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Garland put 68% of her first serves in, winning 60% (24/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 42% (8/19) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Hartono 7 times after converting 58% of her break points (7/12).
Garland has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 68% of her matches (272-127). 14-11 on hard in 2025. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Garland has an overall166-71 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title the W35 Nairobi where she overcame Angella Okutoyi in the final 6-1 6-4 and the W35 Solarino where she beat Weronika Falkowska in the final 6-1 6-2 and the W35 Solarino where she defeated Viktoria Hruncakova in the final 7-6(4) 6-2.
Joanna has a compiled 44-20 win-loss record in 2025, 14-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Chennai
Garland has never competed in this tournament before.
Mei Yamaguchi
29 - 29win/loss
282
242
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-31 | 23-21 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2024 | 47-28 | 33-24 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 13-3 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-24 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 4-3 |
| 2022 | 15-13 | 1-4 | 8-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 5-2 |
| 2021 | 26-13 | 13-4 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 279, Yamaguchi got to the 2nd round after defeating Ankita Raina 6-1 6-3, Arina Rodionova 2-6 6-4 6-2 and Francesca Jones 5-7 6-0 1-0 ret..
In the 1st round against Jones, Mei had a free pass after Jones retired on a 5-7 6-0 1-0 . scoreline.
The Japanese has an overall 29-29 win-loss record in 2025, 21-19 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Garland | Yamaguchi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 61 |
| Pts | 67-57 | 222-182 |
| Total Points | 124 | 404 |
| Winners | 24 | 80 |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% |
Garland played 1 match while Yamaguchi competed in 3 matches. Yamaguchi started her run from the qualifications while Garland had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Mei Yamaguchi dropped 2 sets while Joanna Garland hasn’t lost a set so far. Garland has played 7 set(s) less than Yamaguchi (2 vs 9). Therefore, Garland played 42 games less than Yamaguchi. Joanna scored 24 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Yamaguchi recorded 80 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Garland | Yamaguchi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2.7 |
| 1st in | 40/59 | 127/196 |
| %1st in | 68% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 24/40 | 80/127 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 8/19 | 35/69 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 51% |
Garland recorded 2 aces . Yamaguchi recorded 8 aces (2.7 per match). Garland won 60% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Yamaguchi won 63% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Garland | Yamaguchi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 17 |
| Converted | 7/12 | 17/36 |
| % Converted | 58% | 47% |
| Conceded | 6 | 18 |
| Saved | 2 | 8 |
| % Saved | 33% | 44% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 10 |
The Chinese broke her opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Garland dropped her serve 4 times and she saved 33% of the break points that she conceded. Mei broke her opponents 17 times with a 47% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded her serve 10 times and she saved 44% of the break points that she conceded.
| Garland | |||
| R1 Hartono | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-57 | 67-57 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 40/59 | 40/59 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 24/40 | 24/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/19 | 8/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Yamaguchi | |||||
| Q1 Raina | Q3 Rodionova | R1 Jones | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | 5-7 6-0 1-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 26 | 19 | 61 | |
| pts | 66-46 | 90-84 | 66-52 | 222-182 | |
| Total points | 112 | 174 | 118 | 404 | |
| Winners | 19 | 38 | 23 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 42% | 35% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 7 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 33/53 | 55/85 | 39/58 | 127/196 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 65% | 67% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 19/33 | 38/55 | 23/39 | 80/127 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 69% | 59% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 15/30 | 9/19 | 35/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 50% | 47% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 7 | 4 | 6 | 17 | |
| Converted | 7/17 | 4/11 | 6/8 | 17/36 | |
| Converted % | 41% | 36% | 75% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 | 4 | 18 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 6/9 | 0/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 67% | 0% | 107% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
Tennis Scores in Chennai
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (6-7 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – Tatiana ProzorovaProzorova (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Nikola BartunkovaBartunkova (1-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Sahaja YamalapalliYamalapalli – Priska Madelyn NugrohoMadelyn Nugroho (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mei YamaguchiYamaguchi – Francesca JonesJones (5-7 6-0 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Joanna GarlandGarland – Arianne HartonoHartono (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Linda FruhvirtovaFruhvirtova – Astrid Lew Yan FoonLew Yan Foon (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Lanlana TararudeeTararudee – Maria TimofeevaTimofeeva (6-2 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Polina IatcenkoIatcenko – Alina CharaevaCharaeva (6-3 5-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Donna VekicVekic – Vaishnavi AdkarAdkar (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Diane ParryParry – Thasaporn NakloNaklo (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Shrivalli Rashmikaa BhamidipatyRashmikaa Bhamidipaty – Maaya Rajeshwaran RevathiRajeshwaran Revathi (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Mia PohankovaPohankova – Nao HibinoHibino (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Janice TjenTjen – Caroline WernerWerner (6-4 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Nina StojanovicStojanovic (6-3 5-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Storm HunterHunter – Mai HontamaHontama (6-70 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – Tatiana ProzorovaProzorova (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Mia PohankovaPohankova – Nao HibinoHibino (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Diane ParryParry – Thasaporn NakloNaklo (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Sahaja YamalapalliYamalapalli – Priska Madelyn NugrohoMadelyn Nugroho (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Shrivalli Rashmikaa BhamidipatyRashmikaa Bhamidipaty (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Storm SandersSanders (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joanna GarlandGarland – Mei YamaguchiYamaguchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction