Patrick Zahraj and Daniil Glinka will face off in the 2nd round of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Glinka who should win in 2 sets.
Daniil Glinka -> 1.285
Patrick Zahraj -> 3.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Patrick Zahraj vs. Daniil Glinka
There is no head to head record between Patrick Zahraj and Daniil Glinka since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Patrick Zahraj
37 - 34win/loss
267
240
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38-36 | 0-1 | 9-15 | 24-16 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-31 | 9-5 | 17-15 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 28-16 | 4-3 | 15-10 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 240 (career-high), Patrick reached the 2nd round after defeating Thai Kwiatkowski 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, Patrick had a good straight sets win against Kwiatkowski (7-5 6-3). During the match, Zahraj scored 80 points vs Kwiatkowski’s 70. Zahraj was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zahraj struck 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Patrick Zahraj was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 73% (29/40) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Zahraj broke Kwiatkowski 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Zahraj has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (145-112). 23-13 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Zahraj has a compiled47-27 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The German’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Pau Challenger and M25 Sion.
Patrick has an aggregate 37-33 win-loss record in 2025, 23-13 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Daniil Glinka
52 - 21win/loss
191
191
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60-23 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 30-9 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 263 (career-high), Daniil got to the 2nd round after beating Patrick Kypson 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Daniil had a good straight sets win against Kypson (6-3 6-3). During the match Glinka scored 65 points vs Kypson’s 52. The Estonian was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Glinka managed to score 13 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniil Glinka was exceptionally effective on serve to win 86% (25/29) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Estonian broke Kypson 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
The Estonian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Trento,M25 Trimbach,the Cassis Challenger and M25 Nevers.
The Estonian has an overall 51-21 win-loss record in 2025, 21-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Daniil has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zahraj | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 18 |
| Pts | 80-70 | 65-52 |
| Total Points | 150 | 117 |
| Winners | 29 | 25 |
| %Winners | 36% | 38% |
Both Zahraj and Glinka played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Zahraj and Glinka have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Zahraj played 3 games more than Glinka. The German scored 29 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Estonian scored 25 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zahraj | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 13 |
| 1st in | 40/75 | 29/56 |
| %1st in | 53% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 25/29 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 15/27 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 56% |
Zahraj blasted 6 aces . Glinka bagged 13 aces . Zahraj won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 86% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zahraj | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 57% | 75% |
| Conceded | 9 | 2 |
| Saved | 8 | 2 |
| % Saved | 89% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Zahraj broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve once and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded. Glinka broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Estonian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Zahraj | |||
| R1 Kwiatkowski | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 80-70 | 80-70 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 40/75 | 40/75 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 29/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 18/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 8/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 89% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Glinka | |||
| R1 Kypson | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-52 | 65-52 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 29/56 | 29/56 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 25/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze – Max WiskandtWiskandt (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Keegan SmithSmith – Darwin BlanchBlanch (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Johannus MondayMonday – Ronit KarkiKarki (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Dylan DietrichDietrich – Alfredo PerezPerez (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Matias SotoSoto (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh – Liam DraxlDraxl (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Andres MartinMartin (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-4 6-75 7-65) – See score progression
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Charles BroomBroom (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre – Andre IlaganIlagan (5-7 7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Tyler ZinkZink (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver TarvetTarvet – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Dhakshineswar SureshSuresh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (0-0) – H2H and prediction